ImageImageImage

How good can The Rainmaker be?

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, Foshan, sixers hoops

Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,024
And1: 19,106
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#21 » by Kobblehead » Sun Feb 9, 2020 2:21 pm

76ciology wrote:Fun fact: Many expected TLC to be better than Furkan

Furkan was playing 11 minutes per game overseas as a 160 pound 17 year old.

All we knew about him was he was a pretty decent shooter that won a dunk contest wearing a cheap Darth Vader costume.
cej11
Sophomore
Posts: 234
And1: 62
Joined: May 29, 2012

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#22 » by cej11 » Sun Feb 9, 2020 3:48 pm

76ciology wrote:Fun fact: Many expected TLC to be better than Furkan


I remember some of those early mock drafts had Tlc as a late lottery pick. Korkmaz was a mid to late 1st rounder.
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 10,133
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#23 » by Arsenal » Sun Feb 9, 2020 3:51 pm

Kobblehead wrote:Wait, are you serious with this Klay thing? Come on, man.


Sorry my bad. I meant that Josh Jackson is the next Kawhi. Does that mesh better with your scouting reports Kobble?
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 61,351
And1: 23,527
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#24 » by 76ciology » Sun Feb 9, 2020 5:11 pm

Arsenal wrote:
Kobblehead wrote:Wait, are you serious with this Klay thing? Come on, man.


Sorry my bad. I meant that Josh Jackson is the next Kawhi. Does that mesh better with your scouting reports Kobble?


From Klay to Klaw
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 9,498
And1: 3,059
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#25 » by sixers hoops » Sun Feb 9, 2020 5:51 pm

Arsenal wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:It bothers me that they didn’t even realize he was good enough to pick up his option. This front office has picked up some really nice players on the margins, but letting him go initially was concerning.

The klay ceiling doesn’t seem realistic. Klay has been a great defender and so far better shooter than Korkmaz. If he becomes a Klay offensively, I’d be thrilled.


Why not compare to Klay at age 22 instead of prime Klay?

http://bkref.com/tiny/naaTO


Usually I think that’s fair, but when one guy has been a five time all-star, all nba, all defense player, that is an upside that is extremely unlikely to reach. I would easily wager thousands of dollars that Korkmaz never makes three all-star appearances, let alone five by Klay’s age. In addition, even if we were so lucky that he matched Klay’s offensive accomplishments, he likely will never be the defender Klay is. I would be happy if he became JJ, since he doesn’t profile to be a great defender.
brannigan73
Rookie
Posts: 1,088
And1: 612
Joined: Apr 28, 2011

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#26 » by brannigan73 » Sun Feb 9, 2020 6:50 pm

Lets temper our enthusiasm a little with Furkan. Ive been encouraged of course like everyone else but advanced plus minus type stats still do not like him very much. At this point really he has one slightly above average NBA skill his 3 pt shooting. He needs to round out his offensive game more (he is mediocre to bad at every shot besides the three) and despite talk to the contrary he is still pretty bad on d like quite far away from being even as scrappy as a JJ Redick who people killed around here. What is good about Furkan is he is still very young and and he has good size and by all accounts works hard. I think maybe a legit 6 man or fringe shooting specialist starter on a stacked team is his ceiling if he maximizes his potential.
Wilfried
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,172
And1: 1,908
Joined: May 24, 2007

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#27 » by Wilfried » Sun Feb 9, 2020 7:24 pm

His shot reminds me a bit of Brent Barry ...
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 10,133
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#28 » by Arsenal » Sun Feb 9, 2020 8:05 pm

brannigan73 wrote:Lets temper our enthusiasm a little with Furkan. Ive been encouraged of course like everyone else but advanced plus minus type stats still do not like him very much. At this point really he has one slightly above average NBA skill his 3 pt shooting. He needs to round out his offensive game more (he is mediocre to bad at every shot besides the three) and despite talk to the contrary he is still pretty bad on d like quite far away from being even as scrappy as a JJ Redick who people killed around here. What is good about Furkan is he is still very young and and he has good size and by all accounts works hard. I think maybe a legit 6 man or fringe shooting specialist starter on a stacked team is his ceiling if he maximizes his potential.


I'm tired of this outdated nonsense. You are parroting stuff from years ago.

THIS YEAR his defense is pretty decent. THIS YEAR his advanced stats are decent as well.

Let's temper our enthusiasm a little with the OUTDATED takes on Furkan.
Kova
Veteran
Posts: 2,517
And1: 711
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Croatia
     

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#29 » by Kova » Sun Feb 9, 2020 10:31 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
76ciology wrote:Fun fact: Many expected TLC to be better than Furkan


It’s kinda hard to evaluate euro players pre-draft. Especially super young ones.


I respectfully disagree. Just because you don't have enough of an access to Euro basketball in US, doesn't mean it's hard to evaluate EU players. If nothing, most of them come from playing a much harder Euroleague basketball than US high school and colleague will ever be.

For example, for europeans Luka Doncic was a no brainer that he would be a star in this league. I was scratching my head seeing him fall to 3th in the draft.

Besides, how about all the US based players evaluation? Bennett, Fultz, Okafor, Fredette, Morrison,Thabeet, Flynn, Thomas Robinson ring a bell? And they were right in front of your nose. :)

I'd say it's lottery sometimes. In a lot of cases you just can't know, no matter where they're coming from.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,155
And1: 16,862
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#30 » by Stanford » Sun Feb 9, 2020 10:36 pm

Image
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 10,133
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#31 » by Arsenal » Sun Feb 9, 2020 10:38 pm

Stanford wrote:Image


So you're saying he'll be the GOAT like his namesake? I can dig it.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 23,353
And1: 13,800
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#32 » by Negrodamus » Sun Feb 9, 2020 10:43 pm

Kova wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
76ciology wrote:Fun fact: Many expected TLC to be better than Furkan


It’s kinda hard to evaluate euro players pre-draft. Especially super young ones.


I respectfully disagree. Just because you don't have enough of an access to Euro basketball in US, doesn't mean it's hard to evaluate EU players. If nothing, most of them come from playing a much harder Euroleague basketball than US high school and colleague will ever be.

For example, for europeans Luka Doncic was a no brainer that he would be a star in this league. I was scratching my head seeing him fall to 3th in the draft.

Besides, how about all the US based players evaluation? Bennett, Fultz, Okafor, Fredette, Morrison,Thabeet, Flynn, Thomas Robinson ring a bell? And they were right in front of your nose. :)

I'd say it's lottery sometimes. In a lot of cases you just can't know, no matter where they're coming from.


I'm not sure what your argument is here.

Are Euro players harder for me to evaluate? 100%. Is college ball better than Euro League? Nope. Those are two separate conversations. Korkmaz was barely playing for Efes before we drafted him. How can I make any form of evaluation without seeing him at a workout or playing in games where he gets more than 10mpg? That has been my experience, an American, with most Euro prospects. I just don't even attempt to evaluate them at this point unless they are more decorated like Luka.

BTW, all of those college prospects were lacking in major quantifiable ways that were overlooked. I feel like leaning on analytical data has been a recent revelation and will become even harder when prospects are able to come out of high school.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,024
And1: 19,106
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#33 » by Kobblehead » Sun Feb 9, 2020 10:49 pm

Negrodamus wrote:when prospects are able to come out of high school.

I would literally never draft a highschool player. Even at the risk of avoiding a hall of famer. Could you imagine being a GM and using a top 5 pick on Diamond Stone?
VDT
Analyst
Posts: 3,487
And1: 2,106
Joined: Oct 13, 2018

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#34 » by VDT » Sun Feb 9, 2020 10:55 pm

High school draftees is probably the best argument against tanking.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,024
And1: 19,106
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#35 » by Kobblehead » Sun Feb 9, 2020 11:06 pm

I would treat highschool kids like non-sure thing international players. Late firsts, only.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 23,353
And1: 13,800
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#36 » by Negrodamus » Sun Feb 9, 2020 11:13 pm

Kobblehead wrote:I would treat highschool kids like non-sure thing international players. Late firsts, only.


I mean, there might be LeBron types out of high school. Obviously can't miss on those. But there is a blurred line on some of those guys. I firmly believe there were a few that probably needed the structure of college for them to realize their potential. You see someone like Gerald Green who is an offensive freak, even coming out of high school, and you get nervous you're missing on TMac.

I just feel like the hype machine here makes things harder.
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,318
And1: 1,811
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#37 » by kriss73 » Sun Feb 9, 2020 11:32 pm

Lebron level with more shooting.
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
creek48
Freshman
Posts: 68
And1: 20
Joined: Dec 22, 2019
 

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#38 » by creek48 » Sun Feb 9, 2020 11:54 pm

Well 19 pts in 11 minutes. I think he is causing a storm tonight.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 61,351
And1: 23,527
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#39 » by 76ciology » Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:50 am

Negrodamus wrote:
Kova wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
It’s kinda hard to evaluate euro players pre-draft. Especially super young ones.


I respectfully disagree. Just because you don't have enough of an access to Euro basketball in US, doesn't mean it's hard to evaluate EU players. If nothing, most of them come from playing a much harder Euroleague basketball than US high school and colleague will ever be.

For example, for europeans Luka Doncic was a no brainer that he would be a star in this league. I was scratching my head seeing him fall to 3th in the draft.

Besides, how about all the US based players evaluation? Bennett, Fultz, Okafor, Fredette, Morrison,Thabeet, Flynn, Thomas Robinson ring a bell? And they were right in front of your nose. :)

I'd say it's lottery sometimes. In a lot of cases you just can't know, no matter where they're coming from.


I'm not sure what your argument is here.

Are Euro players harder for me to evaluate? 100%. Is college ball better than Euro League? Nope. Those are two separate conversations. Korkmaz was barely playing for Efes before we drafted him. How can I make any form of evaluation without seeing him at a workout or playing in games where he gets more than 10mpg? That has been my experience, an American, with most Euro prospects. I just don't even attempt to evaluate them at this point unless they are more decorated like Luka.

BTW, all of those college prospects were lacking in major quantifiable ways that were overlooked. I feel like leaning on analytical data has been a recent revelation and will become even harder when prospects are able to come out of high school.


TLC looked athletic on video clips then suddenly looked like a below average athlete in the nba.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 61,351
And1: 23,527
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: How good can The Rainmaker be? 

Post#40 » by 76ciology » Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:24 am

We should learn on how Kork was able to turn a crisis into an opportunity
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers