RealGM

And there goes Nerlens, on a 1 year deal to the Knicks...honestly disappointing. Preferred him to Dwight Howard. But we can always go get him again next year, if he doesnt up his value too much playing behind Mitchell Robinson.

Hey fl311, does the Howard signing impact efforts to move Mike Scott?

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

I hate it that we have to talk about Mike Scott and Zhaire Smith as if they were relevant NBA players.

76thBearCub wrote:I hate it that we have to talk about Mike Scott and Zhaire Smith as if they were relevant NBA players.

Slap a first and a second to them and they are

76thBearCub wrote:I hate it that we have to talk about Mike Scott and Zhaire Smith as if they were relevant NBA players.

Do we do that? I feel like they're talked about as expiring salary filler.

God dammit.

?s=19

Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk

I thought Doc is a recruiter. All we have signed so far is Dwight.

mithrandir17 wrote:I thought Doc is a recruiter. All we have signed so far is Dwight.

He can recruit people related to him.

I mean he would have been okay, but he's been injury prone for a while.

Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk

I'm telling you. Get ready for Austin Rivers.

Sent from my SM-G970U using RealGM mobile app

Im ok with nepotism if Doc can bring the brother of his son in law here.

It seems a fa signing is less likely every minuten goes by.
Or are there really fa signings left that provide additional value? a back up.playmaking pg seems handy...

Maybe a trade is more what could be expected.
Also a possibility we see how this season goes and make mid season moves or profit of buy outs then.

KKell2507 wrote:And there goes Nerlens, on a 1 year deal to the Knicks...honestly disappointing. Preferred him to Dwight Howard. But we can always go get him again next year, if he doesnt up his value too much playing behind Mitchell Robinson.

He is so far superior to Dwight. This stinks, man!

Teague has looked a little like he is on the steep part of the downside, doubt he would have played much.

Austin is still out there and feels kind of inevitable if a bigger deal doesn't go through.

youngcrev wrote:

76thBearCub wrote:I hate it that we have to talk about Mike Scott and Zhaire Smith as if they were relevant NBA players.

Do we do that? I feel like they're talked about as expiring salary filler.

Your right. But expiring money isn't all created equal. Some guys who are clearly not worth their contract can still contribute. The Horford trade feels better with Danny Green then it would with just a couple random expiring turds.

Noel signed for 5M for 1 year because he knows it is exactly what Scott makes and we can trade for him straight up before the trade deadline.

Skates wrote:Teague has looked a little like he is on the steep part of the downside, doubt he would have played much.

Austin is still out there and feels kind of inevitable if a bigger deal doesn't go through.

Nepotism aside, based on how they both played last year I feel like I would rather have Austin? He's a solid C+/B- on both ends not sure if you can say that about Teague.

FWIW looking at the Celtics board thread about Teague they're not exactly jumping for joy.

Sportfan73 wrote:

76thBearCub wrote:I hate it that we have to talk about Mike Scott and Zhaire Smith as if they were relevant NBA players.

Slap a first and a second to them and they are

Yea then its a trade package but its a really weak trade package that most other teams could equal or do better.

76thBearCub wrote:

youngcrev wrote:

76thBearCub wrote:I hate it that we have to talk about Mike Scott and Zhaire Smith as if they were relevant NBA players.

Do we do that? I feel like they're talked about as expiring salary filler.

Your right. But expiring money isn't all created equal. Some guys who are clearly not worth their contract can still contribute. The Horford trade feels better with Danny Green then it would with just a couple random expiring turds.

Sure, but if we're looking at teams that are willing to dump a contributor, they probably don't really care as long as they are getting some draft capitol back.

Stanford wrote:

KKell2507 wrote:And there goes Nerlens, on a 1 year deal to the Knicks...honestly disappointing. Preferred him to Dwight Howard. But we can always go get him again next year, if he doesnt up his value too much playing behind Mitchell Robinson.

He is so far superior to Dwight. This stinks, man!

Nah he would have been fun but they’re basically equal at this point in time. I’m actually intrigued with what Dwight has to offer as backup.