mjkvol wrote:Sixerscan wrote:mjkvol wrote:With the obvious assumption that switching from Spalding to Wilson was about money because 'follow the money' answers virtually every question - does anyone know why they would not have Wilson produce a ball with the same specs and feel as the Spalding ball the players clearly prefer? The new ball seems to be a major concern with a lot of players and is clearly affecting performance.
I'd imagine several reasons, biggest one probably being that Wilson doesn't sell Spalding balls, they sell Wilson balls. There are production costs with changing the design of the ball you produce. Plus, why would you pay all this money to be the official ball of the NBA just make your ball copy that of your biggest rival? You'd be implicitly acknowledging your ball as inferior. There may also be legal reasons that Wilson can't just copy Spalding's design, not sure.
And I don't think there's any fundamental issue with the ball, it's just that guys aren't used to it. They'd rather just wait it out and let them get used to it, and then in 10 years or whenever their contract is up and Nike or someone outbids then, the players can complain about that then.
Regarding paying all the money to be the official ball, what difference does the ball makeup really make other than game performance and how the pros like or dislike it? Becoming "the official ball of the NBA" is similar to stadium and arena naming rights - for your corporate name and logo to get as much exposure as possible and the prestige of providing equipment for those at the highest level of the sport. I would think the constant public complaints don't exactly help Wilson's image.
Having spent my career in the golf industry, it's not that far removed from players switching equipment companies - the new company was only concerned with their logo being on the hat and shirt of the player, and the player's performance showing the quality of the gear.
Tiger Woods played Mizuno, Titleist, and Nike irons, and they were all virtually identical forged blades, the only difference being the logo on the clubhead.
I agree with you that the players will always find something to complain about if they aren't playing well, and the ball is a convenient scapegoat at the moment.
Well I'm not sure if basketball production really has the same kind of customization as golf, but I feel like that's exactly the difference, Tiger likes one type of blade, Phil likes another, etc. In basketball have to pick one. I think if a large enough contingent of the players complained they would make a change, that actually happened once before as I recall, but I guess that hasn't happened. As you said some guys complain about it, other guys are having great seasons and may love the change. Wilson balls are used during the NCAA tournament as well as a bunch of college programs, it's not some crazy out of the box shift.
I would say your golf comp is more equivalent to the shoes guys wear. A guy may be sponsored by Nike but choose to wear Lebrons, Kobes, KDs etc. (all of which have a different models and styles within them) depending on their preference.
Also, Embiid is shooting a career high 40% from 3 this year, fwiw.