Post#7 » by ChuckS » Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:49 pm
I'm not arrogant enough to think I know more than Mo and Jim, but I might, personally, question replacing Willie Green with Lou Williams, even for reasons other than their obvious defensive differences.
Lou has averaged 36% shooting in his last twelve games and 41.3% for the year. Keep in mind that much of this has been against second stringers. That is about as bad (in the same time frame) as Willie's last seven games (that someone pointed out), and worse than Willie's 41.8% YTD. Maybe it looks better because Williams played 124 less minutes, so it may have hurt less.
Again, because of the defensive problems it creates (and a tiring effect) by having Andre have to play the strongest backcourt scoring threat, I do not see it as an upgrade. Mo, however, might see different potential in practice...or in his game observations.
I might, with some reservations (because I think Green is a better defender than he is given credit for), go with Young at the three and AI in the backcourt. This would help our size and rebounding, and, in Willie, give us another scoring threat off of the bench, and a defender who might somewhat compensate for Lou Wil.
At least Thad is currently shooting 50%. But of course, because of his limited minutes, the opponent "book" on him has not yet been written...except for the knowledge that when he or Smith comes in for Reggie, the opposing PF should attack the rim. Currently, I could probably live with him at the three, particularly since Carney seems to have lost the offensive potential he showed in college. I can see giving it a try the way Willie and Lou have been shooting. He was at least a relatively high first round draft pick.