Page 1 of 1
Would you trade Andre Miller and Change for Michael Redd?
Posted: Sun Jun 8, 2008 5:18 am
by IggyTheBEaST
In a 3 way trade, if it were on the table, Would you trade Andre Miller and change for Michael Redd?
Posted: Sun Jun 8, 2008 9:50 am
by corwin
Voted no for 2 reasons. His salary is too high for his production & you can't pay a SG that much money if you're planning to keep Iguodala. You could make a run at Arenas for similar money (I'm not advocating that) but at least he could play PG.
Posted: Sun Jun 8, 2008 12:46 pm
by ITK9
Absolutly no.Redd is a selfish player that plays zero D and has awful shot selection.
Posted: Sun Jun 8, 2008 1:10 pm
by sec-106
corwin wrote:Voted no for 2 reasons. His salary is too high for his production & you can't pay a SG that much money if you're planning to keep Iguodala.
Posted: Sun Jun 8, 2008 1:36 pm
by chrice
We've already had a crappy defensive team this century. It didn't work out very well, no need to repeat.
Posted: Sun Jun 8, 2008 2:28 pm
by is1531
ITK9 wrote:Absolutly no.Redd is a selfish player that plays zero D and has awful shot selection.
THat is the Michael Redd I know and dislike. Milwauakee is a team with no defense. They show up to shoot the ball only. Stay away from Miwaukee players. Mo Williams is a nice player, but we do not need him.

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:34 pm
by is1531
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:37 pm
by sixers_610
If you pictured our team after that trade, we'd probably be considerably worse than we are now.
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:15 pm
by UptownPhilly
Redd makes far too much money, but if we were to bring him in I'd rather do something like:
Green + Evans + Cap Space
Use our #16 on a PF(Speights?)
Miller/Williams
Redd/Carney
Iguodala/Young
Speights/Jason Smith
Dalembert/Booth