Chemistry Questions
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:09 pm
I hope that now that Lou is signed, that Iguodala will sign soon. Then we can switch our focus from buisiness to chemistry. Here are the main questions as I see it:
1. Miller- He is great in helping stabilize a young team, but has limitted range (despite having good selection shooting at 50%)
-How will he meld w/ Iguodala and Thad.
-Is his pure point and post skills less relevant as Young, Iguodala and Lou become more polished?
-Should he be moved for a better shooter like Hinrich or extended at a lower number for 2-3 years?
2. Sam- He potentially has the most to gain from the added attention drawn by Brand on both ends. He was a key cog when the team lacked anyone else with length, but now the team has surprising front court depth.
-Will he be satisfied by easy dunks ands put backs, or will he want to showcase his jumper and non-existent post moves?
-Should he be moved while his value is highest?
3.Speights- Has surprising (for #16) size/athletasism/moves/touch.
-Does he project to be a center next to Brand (whose 9'2" reach allows him to often cover centers himself)?
-How soon can he replace Sam, and does that mean Sam should be moved in 6-12months? I think Evans/Smith would be a nice back-up duo for Brand/Speights as starters.
4. Iguodala: Can finally shift to a more appropriate complementary role on offense, while being a leader on defense and special teams(transition basketball.)
-Does his World B Free rainmaking arc preclude him from being a reliable jump shooter?
-Does his pedestrian jumper mean Miller needs top be replaced by a better shooting PG?
-Can he develop into a post force now that he is at SG?
4. Young: We all know his development is the key to whether the team is a legit contender.
-For the short term should he still rotate between 3/4 and have the team add a good SG or SF through trading Sam/Miller? Or is he ready enough to be a top SF by next year?
5. Lou:
-When Young is more polished, will the teams high skill level at SG/SF/PF allow him to become a scoring PG, or do they still need a more pure, steadier hand at the controls?
1. Miller- He is great in helping stabilize a young team, but has limitted range (despite having good selection shooting at 50%)
-How will he meld w/ Iguodala and Thad.
-Is his pure point and post skills less relevant as Young, Iguodala and Lou become more polished?
-Should he be moved for a better shooter like Hinrich or extended at a lower number for 2-3 years?
2. Sam- He potentially has the most to gain from the added attention drawn by Brand on both ends. He was a key cog when the team lacked anyone else with length, but now the team has surprising front court depth.
-Will he be satisfied by easy dunks ands put backs, or will he want to showcase his jumper and non-existent post moves?
-Should he be moved while his value is highest?
3.Speights- Has surprising (for #16) size/athletasism/moves/touch.
-Does he project to be a center next to Brand (whose 9'2" reach allows him to often cover centers himself)?
-How soon can he replace Sam, and does that mean Sam should be moved in 6-12months? I think Evans/Smith would be a nice back-up duo for Brand/Speights as starters.
4. Iguodala: Can finally shift to a more appropriate complementary role on offense, while being a leader on defense and special teams(transition basketball.)
-Does his World B Free rainmaking arc preclude him from being a reliable jump shooter?
-Does his pedestrian jumper mean Miller needs top be replaced by a better shooting PG?
-Can he develop into a post force now that he is at SG?
4. Young: We all know his development is the key to whether the team is a legit contender.
-For the short term should he still rotate between 3/4 and have the team add a good SG or SF through trading Sam/Miller? Or is he ready enough to be a top SF by next year?
5. Lou:
-When Young is more polished, will the teams high skill level at SG/SF/PF allow him to become a scoring PG, or do they still need a more pure, steadier hand at the controls?