Chelsea banned from making transfers

Moderators: kdawg32086, magik9113

User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#21 » by 5DOM » Fri Sep 4, 2009 5:09 am

Read the post above. It looks like the age limit in France is 16, and that's why Lens and Le Havre could sign Kakuta and Pogba only to agreements promising they would sign the professional contracts when they become 16.

j-far wrote:I don't know if this will stick anyway because Chelsea PLC is a private firm and I don't think FIFA can stop them from employing new players. Very controversial area this is and I wonder if Real should also be punished because enticing Ronaldo, Ribery and Alonso also seems illegal.


Man U should sue Real. But seriously, I bet all the big clubs do this. English teams getting **** on lately (except the Mutu case)
Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,798
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#22 » by Slava » Fri Sep 4, 2009 5:35 am

5DOM wrote:Read the post above. It looks like the age limit in France is 16, and that's why Lens and Le Havre could sign Kakuta and Pogba only to agreements promising they would sign the professional contracts when they become 16.


So when did Chelsea sign and him? He's 18 right now so I assume he was signed a couple of seasons ago? Also why does the DRC arbitration panel say that he has broken a "signed contract"?
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#23 » by 5DOM » Fri Sep 4, 2009 5:53 am

j-far wrote:So when did Chelsea sign and him? He's 18 right now so I assume he was signed a couple of seasons ago?


He signed the professional contract with Chelsea when he turned 16, so that's a couple of years ago.

Also why does the DRC arbitration panel say that he has broken a "signed contract"?


It's the youth pre-contract (promising to sign professionally with the youth club when the player becomes of age). Chelsea does deserve some kind of penalty because the club and Kakuta broke this signed contract. United might also be in trouble if Le Havre really does have Pogba's signed pre-contract like it claims.
Image
User avatar
Ong_dynasty
Head Coach
Posts: 6,386
And1: 355
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London
         

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#24 » by Ong_dynasty » Fri Sep 4, 2009 11:21 am

j-far wrote:I don't know if this will stick anyway because Chelsea PLC is a private firm and I don't think FIFA can stop them from employing new players. Very controversial area this is and I wonder if Real should also be punished because enticing Ronaldo, Ribery and Alonso also seems illegal.


My understanding is that there was a breach of contract with no compensation...You are right Fifa in theory may not be allowed for a firm to employing anybody..But Fifa do have the right to ban them transfering players as those are within FIfa Rules..!
My understanding what differs from this is that they signed a youth player by breaching another contract..
Its funny how for a team with so much money, didnt think of just giving lens some compensation...
O well...
WHat I think of this is what I think of the UEFA V Eduardo case..
If they are going to be consistent with it..then I am up for it...but if nothing changes, then these governing bodies do have something against English teams..
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#25 » by 5DOM » Fri Sep 4, 2009 12:19 pm

At the time, there was a rumor that Roman actually gave Lens 200,000 pounds (or 20,000 I am not sure) as a good gesture because compensation wasn't really required by law. But I read this on one of the Chelsea forums, so it could be wrong
Image
kromoszoma
Rookie
Posts: 1,076
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
Location: Hungary

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#26 » by kromoszoma » Fri Sep 4, 2009 1:38 pm

5DOM wrote:Read the post above. It looks like the age limit in France is 16, and that's why Lens and Le Havre could sign Kakuta and Pogba only to agreements promising they would sign the professional contracts when they become 16.


Yes, but the age limit is 18 in France and 17 in England.
kromoszoma
Rookie
Posts: 1,076
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 08, 2006
Location: Hungary

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#27 » by kromoszoma » Fri Sep 4, 2009 1:49 pm

A little offtopic, sorry

Ong_dynasty wrote:WHat I think of this is what I think of the UEFA V Eduardo case..
If they are going to be consistent with it..then I am up for it...but if nothing changes, then these governing bodies do have something against English teams..


They can't be consistent with the diving stuff, everybody knows that, even them.
http://www.football365.com/story/0,1703 ... 65,00.html

Very good comment right under the article:

"It is only four months or so since the Darren Fletcher incident. An incorrect red card, and the automatic ban, deprived Fletcher of a place in the Champion's League Final.

UEFA's reaction at the time "there is no process of appeal against an incorrect decision by the referee".

Now the new UEFA rule seems to be "there is no process of appeal against an incorrect decision by the referee, unless we at UEFA think he got it wrong, in which case, we will decide what suits us, on a case by case basis, and with no regard for the rules of natural justice, and certainly with no regard whatsoever for consistency".

I am amazed that one of the best football players of his generation, Michel Platini, could be such a lousy administrator, judging by UEFA's performance this year. "


They might try to be a little tougher on the tapping up business, and rightly so, but I really don't think Chelsea are the only ones who do this kind of stuff.
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#28 » by 5DOM » Fri Sep 4, 2009 2:21 pm

These are some of the players the big 4 clubs of England have/had been accused of stealing because the players refused to sign with their original clubs when they turned 16.

Chelsea:

Vincenzo Camilleri when he turned 16. He's now back with Reggina after a bad year in England
Reggina are fuming with Chelsea as the London giants wrap up the signing of Italy U16 defender Vincenzo Camilleri this week.

Reggina president Lillo Foti snapped: "Another talent of Italian football has been removed from our world. This happened because of negotiations initiated by a club, Chelsea, in a time that should not allowed because the footballer had not reached sixteen years of age.

"Camilleri - despite an invitation from the club - refused to participate in official games, as he preferred to go to London, accompanied by his mother and an agent to reach a financial agreement with Chelsea. Everything that has happened has done so outside the national and international rules."

Foti then revealed: "To reach their goal, Mr Frank Arnesen and Carlo Jacomuzzi, using the helicopters of Abramovich, have landed in an area not within their jurisdiction, the Sports Centre of Sant'Agata and have ransacked it, putting on a display of power and money, compared to the daily work and sacrifice of Reggina."

Foti says he intends to take the case to UEFA president Michel Platini, no great friend of the Premiership, and other official bodies


Sergio Tejera when he turned 16. Espanyol was compensated.

Gael Kakuta when he turned 16.

Tom Taiwo and Michael Woods. There was a talk of point deduction being the penalty for Chelsea, but apparently Leeds was found to be responsible.
He joined Chelsea from Leeds United along with Michael Woods in a controversial move after Ken Bates accused Chelsea of tapping up the youngsters.



Manchester United:

Giuseppe Rossi. Parma was compensated $200,000.
"I read today that Ferguson has been complaining about Madrid, that they are not behaving like gentlemen," added the former Parma coach. "But that's a man talking, a club talking, who committed a robbery with Giuseppe Rossi who is now at Villarreal.

"When I was at Parma they took advantage of the bankruptcy of Parmalat to steal Rossi from us, who was only 16."


Federico Macheda. I'm sure everyone knows the story.

Magnus Wolff Eikrem. Refused to practice for the Norwegian Youth team and headed to England when he turned 16.
Solskjaer's former club Molde were also alerted to Eikrem's fast growing reputation and offered him a contract. But the lure of the Reds proved too much and Eikrem is delighted to be following in the footsteps of his fellow countryman and United European Cup goalscoring legend.


Paul Pogba
Alberto Massacci
Gerard Pique


Liverpool:

Daniel Pacheco
Gerardo Bruna
Astrit Ajdarevic
Krisztian Adorjan
Stephen Sama
Christopher Buchtmann

Arsenal:

Cesc Fabregas
Fran Mérida. Ordered by the courts to pay a huge fee to Barcelona
Arturo Lupoli
Armand Traore
Johan Djourou
Nicklas Bendtner


Most of them probably didn't sign the pre-contracts though.
Image
User avatar
Munchlaxatives
RealGM
Posts: 13,897
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Location: Any way the wind blows...in Houston

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#29 » by Munchlaxatives » Fri Sep 4, 2009 7:13 pm

Plenty of big European clubs do the same, taking players from youth programs in South America/Mexico.

Thing is...there's laws that teams can get around or use to their advantage.
I'm sorry I haven't been funny. I am not a comedian. I am Lenny Bruce.
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#30 » by 5DOM » Sat Sep 5, 2009 1:44 am

FIFA's just said that Le Havre hasn't taken any action yet, therefore is currently not planning on penalizing Man U. I guess Le Havre was just lying about the signed contract/document.
Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,798
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#31 » by Slava » Sat Sep 5, 2009 2:24 am

Thank God! There'd be a mass muppet suicide if they said no transfers for United. :lol:
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#32 » by 5DOM » Sat Sep 5, 2009 4:53 am

New devlopment on the Pogba story:
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 81979.html

but I think United is in a much better situation than Chelsea. There's a hole in Pogba's contract apparently.

There are serious doubts in France that Le Havre, who are yet to lodge a complaint with Fifa, have the same strength case as Lens did over Chelsea's conduct in the acquisition of Kakuta. While Kakuta was tied to a contract aspirant – an agreement French youngsters sign at 16 committing them to signing a full professional contract at a later date – Pogba and his parents had signed a bridging agreement, a contract de non solicitation, enforceable in France though not necessarily elsewhere and primarily designed to stave off rival French clubs before the aspirant is signed.

Manchester United are understood to be extremely confident that anything Pogba signed did not amount to a legally binding contract and that they were quite within their rights to pursue their player.

But then again, so did Chelsea, who will not receive Fifa's full legal grounds for their transfer ban for several weeks, but have been stunned by a decision which they will take to the Court for Arbitration in Sport, possibly in December.


Even at the worst scenario, it's going to take FIFA a couple of years.
But really, something has to be done to protect the smaller clubs from losing their youths for nothing.

Player poaching: Italy and Germany

Italian clubs, who have suffered more than French from British clubs' interest in their young players, are lobbying Uefa to tighten up laws governing the transfers of under-18s overseas.

Manchester United's youth team are generally a good guide to the cream of Italian youth, with the loss of Federico Macheda and Davide Petrucci from Lazio and Roma a source of angst before Michele Fornasier headed the same way from Fiorentina. It was Macheda's case earlier this year which raised the issue of Premier League clubs moving for 15-year-olds, with Italian clubs hidebound by their inability to sign them up under the age of 16. "They tempt parents with big money and offers of work, without any ethical codes," Lazio president Claudio Lotito said at the time. "All these players are stolen as a matter of course."

Reggina's complaint to Uefa and the Italian football federation over the loss of Vincenzo Camilleri is also under consideration. Borussia Dortmund were not happy either, when they lost Stephen Sama and Christopher Buchtmann to Liverpool from their academy, though Germany is not understood to support the idea of a Uefa ban on clubs signing foreign players under the age of 18, principally because that would limit its potential to hire from its own sizeable immigrant communities.

But France is perhaps bound to feel the sting of indignation more than most. Some of its finest young players are also to be found in the Italian leagues, as they have been since the departures of Mikael Silvestre and his Rennes team-mate Ousmane Dabo to Inter was a source of national indignation 11 years ago.
Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,798
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#33 » by Slava » Sat Sep 5, 2009 5:11 am

Signing 15 year olds in unethical but clubs would resort to anything to get an upper hand in such a competitive sport. These smaller clubs are better served by signing MOUs with bigger clubs if they do not want to run their academies for nothing. An MOU would atleast guarantee that they can keep these younger players on their team until they're ready to play in first teams.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#34 » by treiz » Sun Sep 6, 2009 1:58 am

That's bollocks, complete and utter bollocks, I understand the whole thing and I seriously do think that the punishment was too harsh, I understand we were wrong but 2 transfer windows...get the **** out of here. I'm fully confident that we will win the appeal, I think a worth punishment is 1 transfer window. Just like the Roma ban when they tried to get Mexes.

But in all seriousness, even if it is one the African Cup of Nations will hurt us even more especially since we can buy players to back-up for Essien, Drogba, and Mikel.

EDIT: We need to get rid of Kenyon, I know he has great eye for talent but I knew he was trouble the moment he stepped onto the Chelsea ground.
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#35 » by 5DOM » Sun Sep 6, 2009 7:17 am

Lampard, Anelka, Ballack, Deco, Joe Cole, Zhirkov, Sturridge and Malouda should do the job fine.
We weren't going to sign a big name player this winter anyway.
Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,798
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#36 » by Slava » Sun Sep 6, 2009 7:47 am

I don't know. I thought There were good signals from you guys that Ancelotti wanted a big name attacking player with approaches for Pato, Aguero and Ribery mentioned at various times.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#37 » by 5DOM » Sun Sep 6, 2009 9:33 pm

j-far wrote:I don't know. I thought There were good signals from you guys that Ancelotti wanted a big name attacking player with approaches for Pato, Aguero and Ribery mentioned at various times.


That was before this window closed. Big name player signing is usually done in the summer when the player's value is at the highest, and the team showed no intention of going after them in the winter. But really, even with Drogba, Essien, Mikel and Kalou gone for 20 days, we'd still have great offense. Arsenal is the only good team we are to face during that period anyway. We are still in a very good situation for this season, and hopefully the penalty gets reduced to 1 transfer window so we can actually sign one of those 3.
Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,798
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#38 » by Slava » Sun Sep 6, 2009 11:44 pm

Ok. I assumed that a transfer window would mean no spending for an entire season. If its just the winter, probably they wouldn't even care.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#39 » by treiz » Mon Sep 7, 2009 12:07 am

5DOM wrote:
j-far wrote:I don't know. I thought There were good signals from you guys that Ancelotti wanted a big name attacking player with approaches for Pato, Aguero and Ribery mentioned at various times.


That was before this window closed. Big name player signing is usually done in the summer when the player's value is at the highest, and the team showed no intention of going after them in the winter. But really, even with Drogba, Essien, Mikel and Kalou gone for 20 days, we'd still have great offense. Arsenal is the only good team we are to face during that period anyway. We are still in a very good situation for this season, and hopefully the penalty gets reduced to 1 transfer window so we can actually sign one of those 3.


The biggest problem I have it that after Drogba and Kalou goes, we only have Anelka and Sturridge as our striker. In January, I was hoping we could maybe loan a striker with an option for a temporary deal. Like we did with Quaresma last year as cover for Joe Cole.

The midfield will be quite capable of covering for Essien although we will miss him and a problem is depth, if Ballack, Lampard or Deco gets injured we pretty much have to rely on Belletti and youth players. Again we can't bring anyone to cover for any injuries.

Also we will probably have to revert back to primarily 4-4-3 rather than using the diamond first then switching to 4-4-3 in certain situations.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,798
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Chelsea banned from making transfers 

Post#40 » by Slava » Tue Sep 8, 2009 6:20 pm

Now City in trouble.

"Manchester City must now realise the consequences of their attitude in the Helan case as it is even more illegal than Kakuta," technical director Pierre Dreossi told The Independent.

"We have referred this to FIFA. For us it was strange to have no discussion from City and now, in the week after the FIFA declaration on Chelsea, I would hope that it will be the same thing for Manchester City.

"Kakuta signed up for just a possibility of a full contract. For Helan there was definitely one there, under the terms of the pre-contract agreement, because he had played for his country.


and suddenly Le Havre are all quiet.

"It's not intimidation but they can't insult us," Gill said at a meeting of the European Clubs Association. "We are not intimidating Le Havre, we have no intention of intimidating Le Havre, they can take whatever action they fell appropriate.

"We have done everything by the book, we are confident in that, they can take whatever action, we won't be insulted by Le Havre.

"It's an insult by Le Havre to suggest that Manchester United and employees of Manchester United have paid the parents and bought the player's parents a house.


Source: Soccernet.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:

Return to The General Soccer Board