Smoove wrote:fudgie wrote:Assists don't tell the whole story. Look up Xavi's assist numbers.
True the build up of the play matters too. But Modric lacks that as well.
I love your avatar

Moderators: kdawg32086, magik9113
Smoove wrote:fudgie wrote:Assists don't tell the whole story. Look up Xavi's assist numbers.
True the build up of the play matters too. But Modric lacks that as well.
Smoove wrote:fudgie wrote:Assists don't tell the whole story. Look up Xavi's assist numbers.
True the build up of the play matters too. But Modric lacks that as well.
KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
Smoove wrote:fudgie wrote:Assists don't tell the whole story. Look up Xavi's assist numbers.
True the build up of the play matters too. But Modric lacks that as well.
MonkeyBallZJr wrote:Smoove wrote:fudgie wrote:Assists don't tell the whole story. Look up Xavi's assist numbers.
True the build up of the play matters too. But Modric lacks that as well.
![]()
If that's the case then what exactly do you think Modric does well then? Modric is the glue to that Spurs team, they can only play that pseudo-fast flowing and possession based game that Redknapp had implemented because of him. He's a lot like Scholes in that sense, neither are amongst the top in assists primarily because they control the game from a bit of a deeper position, their importance to the team is not reflected in the stat sheets.
Smoove wrote:
Well every time I've seen the Spurs play I've seen him just mess up the build up of the play. Also Scholes is a defensive-mid, while Modric is way more attacking then Scholes.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.
Return to The General Soccer Board