Bigger choke job: Spurs 13' or Liverpool 14'?

Moderators: kdawg32086, magik9113

User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,438
And1: 2,013
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: Bigger choke job: Spurs 13' or Liverpool 14'? 

Post#21 » by Doormatt » Sun May 18, 2014 7:09 pm

No_20 wrote:Spurs also came out of nowhere because of Westbrook's injury.

And Heat were massive favorites in the Finals. They won 27 games in a row and LeBron James played the best basketball of his life.


How the fck did the spurs come out of nowhere? They were 3rd in SRS and the 2nd seed. You need to look up the definition of nowhere.
#doorgek
EasternHeretic
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,308
And1: 315
Joined: May 18, 2014

Re: Bigger choke job: Spurs 13' or Liverpool 14'? 

Post#22 » by EasternHeretic » Mon May 19, 2014 12:34 am

Spurs IMO
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

Re: Bigger choke job: Spurs 13' or Liverpool 14'? 

Post#23 » by cb4_89 » Sat May 24, 2014 10:38 pm

Doormatt wrote:nobody counts liverpool as a choke because nobody even expected them to finish in the top 4. its like if the blazers made it to the finals and lost in game 7.

so this thread is kinda dumb. especially since youre comparing it to an actual choke job.


If the blazers led 3-0 or 3-1 in the finals and lost in 7, it would be considered a choke job.

Return to The General Soccer Board