bbms wrote:El Belgian wrote:i love this x person did something wrong so suarez should avoid punishment logic. we are very close to a post that says "hitler killed jews therefore suarez is innocent"
I also love the "we know everyone does worse things on a football match, but who cares, i only want Suárez head for the worst penalty possible!"
Seriously, the inconsistent ones are you pro-ban. Suárez should receive his punishment, but banning him doesn't punish him at a personal level at all. It punishes the WC and that's as clear as a cup of water.
Inconsistent? All we've said that he deserves to suffer for the consequences of his actions, whereas you're the one that goes around saying he shouldn't be banned because "of the Uruguayan people and the fans of this WC" and all this nonsense about "affecting him at a personal level". Now you're saying he should be banned.
Honestly, who cares about him on a personal level, he makes millions of pounds a year to play football and in his mind he thought 3 times it was a good decision to bite someone. We as a society should not be sympathetic to this type of behaviour and he's quite clearly not willing to reform. He's been given enough chance to reform and he's rejected all of them. He's already been punished twice for similar incidents and he hasn't learned, maybe the only time he'll ever learn is if he's kept off the pitch altogether, maybe that 2 year ban seems more reasonable then.
It does punish the WC in terms of quality, and it does punish the Uruguayan team but he should've known that as he is a professional athlete and this is the third time he's done it, he knows what he did and should be punished accordingly.
