2014 FIFA World Cup: Group D (URA/CRC/ENG/ITA)

poeman · Post #1641 » by **poeman** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:53 pm

MaliBrah wrote:Lol he can't train and be near any stadiums and banned from all football activities but he's allowed to transfer ... Makes sense. FIFA just making it up on the fly lol.

Sucks for Liverpool he misses tons of games and 3 CL games in a tough group

Arsenal sends its regards 8-)

Ted Lasso · Post #1642 » by **Ted Lasso** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:58 pm

TheAdmiral wrote:Definitely warranted a more severe punishment than that assessed.

Four months and 9 games... Meh.

In total, that's around 24 matches.

TheAdmiral · Post #1643 » by **TheAdmiral** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:03 pm

Ted Lasso wrote:In total, that's around 24 matches.

They were debating something along the lines of a 2 year ban, weren't they? Punishment could have certainly been much worse.

Boognish · Post #1644 » by **Boognish** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:16 pm

What did Cantona get for the kung fu kick at Palace, 9 months? And Rio for not taking a drug test?

These suspensions don't seem terribly consistent but if you can't stop **** biting people you get what you get

Foye · Post #1645 » by **Foye** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:23 pm

Suarez banned 4 months for a small bite.

Sakho who almost destroyed the head of someone goes unpunished. Platini will make sure, book it.

ItalianBull · Post #1646 » by **ItalianBull** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:25 pm

Boognish wrote:What did Cantona get for the kung fu kick at Palace, 9 months? And Rio for not taking a drug test?

These suspensions don't seem terribly consistent but if you can't stop **** biting people you get what you get

9 months for Cantona and i think 2 months for Ferdinand.

El Turco · Post #1647 » by **El Turco** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:27 pm

Foye wrote:Suarez banned 4 months for 3 bites

fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

GMgoran · Post #1648 » by **GMgoran** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:27 pm

El Belgian wrote:should've gotten more. sucks for liverpool though.

Well, he was suspended at the start of last season, and it hasn't prevented him from being the POY in the Premier League, with most goals and assists in the league ...

Foye · Post #1649 » by **Foye** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:29 pm

El Belgian wrote:
Foye wrote:Suarez banned 4 months for 3 bites

fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

He never bit anybody with the NT. The first 2 shouldn't count when making the suspension. He tried, though in the confed cup. Chiellini, too. :lol:

El Turco · Post #1650 » by **El Turco** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:29 pm

GMgoran wrote:
El Belgian wrote:should've gotten more. sucks for liverpool though.

Well, he was suspended at the start of last season, and it hasn't prevented him from being the POY in the Premier League, with most goals and assists in the league ...

and liverpool will be without the leading scorer and assist man for 3 months. sucks for them.

El Turco · Post #1651 » by **El Turco** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:31 pm

Foye wrote:
El Belgian wrote:
Foye wrote:Suarez banned 4 months for 3 bites

fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

He never bit anybody with the NT. The first 2 shouldn't count when making the suspension. He tried, though in the confed cup. Chiellini, too.

UEFA and FA is part of fifa and fifa has jurisdiction over them. doesn't matter if he did it in nt or not.

Boognish · Post #1652 » by **Boognish** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:32 pm

Liverpool playing Southampton, Citeh, Tottenham their first three games in the EPL, Everton in there early.

Sturridge had better be on or they could be in an early hole. Ricky Lambert ftw

Ted Lasso · Post #1653 » by **Ted Lasso** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:32 pm

Foye wrote:
El Belgian wrote:
Foye wrote:Suarez banned 4 months for 3 bites

fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

He never bit anybody with the NT. The first 2 shouldn't count when making the suspension. He tried, though in the confed cup. Chiellini, too.

I disagree.

Foye · Post #1654 » by **Foye** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:33 pm

El Belgian wrote:
Foye wrote:
El Belgian wrote:
fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

He never bit anybody with the NT. The first 2 shouldn't count when making the suspension. He tried, though in the confed cup. Chiellini, too.

UEFA and FA is part of fifa and fifa has jurisdiction over them. doesn't matter if he did it in nt or not.

Surely it matters. Completely different competitions. But nevermind. Actually, I don't care. It was to be expected he is gone for the tourney. What happens with Liverpool I don't care much about.

ItalianBull · Post #1655 » by **ItalianBull** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:35 pm

El Belgian wrote:
Foye wrote:Suarez banned 4 months for 3 bites

fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

Not according to the FIFA file. It said he broke two articles, his previous sanctions were not mentioned anywhere.

DD12 · Post #1656 » by **DD12** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:35 pm

Poor guy

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

El Turco · Post #1657 » by **El Turco** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:37 pm

Martin87 wrote:
El Belgian wrote:
Foye wrote:Suarez banned 4 months for 3 bites

fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

Not according to the FIFA file. It said he broke two articles, his previous sanctions were not mentioned anywhere.

Fischer declined to name the committee members who would decide the case, with the exception of Sulser, the chairman, or even say how many would be part of the discussions. But she emphasized that the disciplinary committee would determine the scope of its investigation and the duration of any potential penalties. That means it can take into account two previous biting incidents in Suárez’s club career, any evidence the Italians choose to present and video of the incident, which the match referee apparently did not see.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/26/sport ... Italy.html

Foye · Post #1658 » by **Foye** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:37 pm

Martin87 wrote:
El Belgian wrote:
Foye wrote:Suarez banned 4 months for 3 bites

fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

Not according to the FIFA file. It said he broke two articles, his previous sanctions were not mentioned anywhere.

FIFA probably just wanted to make an example that they don't tolerate this behaviour on the pitch as the whole world watches these games.

ItalianBull · Post #1659 » by **ItalianBull** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:40 pm

El Belgian wrote:
Martin87 wrote:
El Belgian wrote:
fixed. his previous bites played a role in the length.

Not according to the FIFA file. It said he broke two articles, his previous sanctions were not mentioned anywhere.

Fischer declined to name the committee members who would decide the case, with the exception of Sulser, the chairman, or even say how many would be part of the discussions. But she emphasized that the disciplinary committee would determine the scope of its investigation and the duration of any potential penalties. That means it can take into account two previous biting incidents in Suárez’s club career, any evidence the Italians choose to present and video of the incident, which the match referee apparently did not see.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/26/sport ... Italy.html

It says it can, not that it did.
http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/news/y=201 ... 86354.html

Thats the FIFA release.

GMgoran · Post #1660 » by **GMgoran** » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:42 pm

El Belgian wrote:
GMgoran wrote:
El Belgian wrote:should've gotten more. sucks for liverpool though.

Well, he was suspended at the start of last season, and it hasn't prevented him from being the POY in the Premier League, with most goals and assists in the league ...

and liverpool will be without the leading scorer and assist man for 3 months. sucks for them.

Last season he was suspended until September 29th ... At the time of his return, we were at the top of the league table ... The best thing about this entire incident (and the suspension) is that Real Madrid and Barcelona will not come after him now ... And we are perfectly fine with that ...

Who advances from Group D?