MaliBrah wrote:we're going to get smoked tomorrow. dreading it
Don't know about that, Chelsea are a very good side but haven't really hit the ground running.
You might if Wenger plays Holding and Monreal in a back 3 again though.
Moderators: kdawg32086, magik9113
MaliBrah wrote:we're going to get smoked tomorrow. dreading it
Ted Lasso wrote:Should've won. Despite Mike Dean.
Baphomet wrote:MaliBrah wrote:we're going to get smoked tomorrow. dreading it
Don't know about that, Chelsea are a very good side but haven't really hit the ground running.
You might if Wenger plays Holding and Monreal in a back 3 again though.
Baphomet wrote:Ted Lasso wrote:Should've won. Despite Mike Dean.
Sissoko starting is the most baffling thing for me. I also don't really like that shape against clubs nearer the bottom.
BUCKnation wrote:Sissoko was fine but moving Trippier to the left sode was so pointless. It takes away his best skill.
Ted Lasso wrote:By the way, Burnley have faced Chelsea, Tottenham, and Liverpool away already. Five points from those games. That's remarkable.
Ted Lasso wrote:BUCKnation wrote:Sissoko was fine but moving Trippier to the left sode was so pointless. It takes away his best skill.
That actually reminds me of the thing that annoyed me the most. Son at wing-back. I thought we were done with that nonsense.
Baphomet wrote:Ted Lasso wrote:BUCKnation wrote:Sissoko was fine but moving Trippier to the left sode was so pointless. It takes away his best skill.
That actually reminds me of the thing that annoyed me the most. Son at wing-back. I thought we were done with that nonsense.
Yeah, I audibly groaned when I saw the team selection. He played fairly well with a poor hand dealt to him, but playing wing back exposes his biggest weaknesses, defensive tracking and tackling.
I'll never forget when he gave away a penalty against Chelsea in the FA Cup semi, which to be honest I didn't really blame him for despite the looseness of the tackle, because he shouldn't have been put in that position in the first place.
BUCKnation wrote:I thought he could probably get away with it given it was Swansea, but once he switched to Trippier at LB it didnt work at all. Just go 4 atb with Verts at LB. The backend of the left side just killed the game because Trippier didnt want to take on anyone or cross with his left. Any attacking play was through the right or down the middle.
I'm not blmaing Trippier for being ineffective because he was put in a really bad spot.
Baphomet wrote:BUCKnation wrote:I thought he could probably get away with it given it was Swansea, but once he switched to Trippier at LB it didnt work at all. Just go 4 atb with Verts at LB. The backend of the left side just killed the game because Trippier didnt want to take on anyone or cross with his left. Any attacking play was through the right or down the middle.
I'm not blmaing Trippier for being ineffective because he was put in a really bad spot.
Yeah, spot on. Did you notice how after Llorente was subbed on, Kane kept drifting to the left flank to try and get something going from over there?
BUCKnation wrote:Baphomet wrote:Yeah, I audibly groaned when I saw the team selection. He played fairly well with a poor hand dealt to him, but playing wing back exposes his biggest weaknesses, defensive tracking and tackling.
I'll never forget when he gave away a penalty against Chelsea in the FA Cup semi, which to be honest I didn't really blame him for despite the looseness of the tackle, because he shouldn't have been put in that position in the first place.
I thought he could probably get away with it given it was Swansea, but once he switched to Trippier at LB it didnt work at all. Just go 4 atb with Verts at LB. The backend of the left side just killed the game because Trippier didnt want to take on anyone or cross with his left. Any attacking play was through the right or down the middle.
I'm not blmaing Trippier for being ineffective because he was put in a really bad spot.
Return to The General Soccer Board