Official Chelsea FC Thread
Moderators: kdawg32086, magik9113
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- fatlever
- Senior Mod - Hornets

- Posts: 59,351
- And1: 15,903
- Joined: Jun 04, 2001
- Location: Terrapin Station
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
i'd still like to consider van ginkel and salah as youth.
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- fatlever
- Senior Mod - Hornets

- Posts: 59,351
- And1: 15,903
- Joined: Jun 04, 2001
- Location: Terrapin Station
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
Chelsea FC @chelseafc 26m
We are expecting a 4-2-3-1 formation tonight with Matic and Van Ginkel holding and Fabregas in the no.10 role behind the striker. #CFC
you watching 5dom? is this the case?
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
fatlever wrote:Chelsea FC @chelseafc 26m
We are expecting a 4-2-3-1 formation tonight with Matic and Van Ginkel holding and Fabregas in the no.10 role behind the striker. #CFC
you watching 5dom? is this the case?
I think Fabregas is playing a little deeper than that, but my stream's not HD.
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- MaliBrah
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,108
- And1: 4,613
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
just seen the cesc freekick , it's going to be tough watching chelsea games this year 
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
-
MountainDrew
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,869
- And1: 885
- Joined: Oct 18, 2012
- Location: Sweden
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
Not been that bad for Vitesse. We basically play the worst possible playing style against a team like Chelsea, we were always going to give away some open chances. Have taken a decent amount of shots. We are missing a bunch of players as well (Striker, Right Winger, Left Back) and there's no way Room (GK) should be playing over Velthuizen.
Traore is so inconsistant. Not sure there's a place in the team once the starters come back, I prefer Vako over Traore. Wallace is solid, think he'll start most games.
Traore is so inconsistant. Not sure there's a place in the team once the starters come back, I prefer Vako over Traore. Wallace is solid, think he'll start most games.
Trust the Process
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- treiz
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,984
- And1: 564
- Joined: Aug 17, 2005
- Location: London, England
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
I <3 Cesc
Great FK
Trying to rotate between this game and the Mets game
Great FK
Trying to rotate between this game and the Mets game
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
MountainDrew wrote:Not been that bad for Vitesse. We basically play the worst possible playing style against a team like Chelsea, we were always going to give away some open chances. Have taken a decent amount of shots. We are missing a bunch of players as well (Striker, Right Winger, Left Back) and there's no way Room (GK) should be playing over Velthuizen.
Traore is so inconsistant. Not sure there's a place in the team once the starters come back, I prefer Vako over Traore. Wallace is solid, think he'll start most games.
I thought Leerdam would start at RB, but he seems to be everywhere in this game?
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
-
MountainDrew
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,869
- And1: 885
- Joined: Oct 18, 2012
- Location: Sweden
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
5DOM wrote:MountainDrew wrote:Not been that bad for Vitesse. We basically play the worst possible playing style against a team like Chelsea, we were always going to give away some open chances. Have taken a decent amount of shots. We are missing a bunch of players as well (Striker, Right Winger, Left Back) and there's no way Room (GK) should be playing over Velthuizen.
Traore is so inconsistant. Not sure there's a place in the team once the starters come back, I prefer Vako over Traore. Wallace is solid, think he'll start most games.
I thought Leerdam would start at RB, but he seems to be everywhere in this game?
His original position is actually CM/CDM, but was forced to play RB for Feyenoord and Vitesse because he's pretty good at it and he was needed at that position. We're testing him out at CM and he might actually start there in midfield alongside Vejinovic and Propper (CAM).
That too, makes it harder for Traore to get into the starting lineup unless we sell Renato Ibarra. There's no way Propper and Vejinovic don't start.
Trust the Process
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
-
MountainDrew
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,869
- And1: 885
- Joined: Oct 18, 2012
- Location: Sweden
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
Don't know why Chelseas TV commentators expected Vitesse to be Barcelona.
Trust the Process
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
-
MountainDrew
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,869
- And1: 885
- Joined: Oct 18, 2012
- Location: Sweden
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
MountainDrew wrote:Don't know why Chelseas TV commentators expected Vitesse to be Barcelona.
I think they just wanted more intensity. The Slovenian team we faced on Sunday was tackling like crazy.
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
-
MountainDrew
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,869
- And1: 885
- Joined: Oct 18, 2012
- Location: Sweden
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
5DOM wrote:MountainDrew wrote:Don't know why Chelseas TV commentators expected Vitesse to be Barcelona.
I think they just wanted more intensity. The Slovenian team we faced on Sunday was tackling like crazy.
I guess so, but the Eredivisie is really not about that. If you want that kind of intensity, you don't play against a dutch team which is more about technique and finesse. Vitesse did create quite a few scoring opportunities, scored 1, hit the post once and got close quite a few times in the first half. I mean, Chelsea were tested.
Trust the Process
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
-
MountainDrew
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,869
- And1: 885
- Joined: Oct 18, 2012
- Location: Sweden
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
I'm probably the only guy who's actually bothered by it though haha, as a Vitesse fan, just disliked the Chelsea commentators being so negative and uninformed about the team they were facing, but that is to be expected in a preseason game against a foreign opponent. I should stop talking about Vitesse in the Chelsea thread, although I might stop by to give some updates on the loanees every once in a while.
Trust the Process
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
MountainDrew wrote:I'm probably the only guy who's actually bothered by it though haha, as a Vitesse fan, just disliked the Chelsea commentators being so negative and uninformed about the team they were facing, but that is to be expected in a preseason game against a foreign opponent. I should stop talking about Vitesse in the Chelsea thread, although I might stop by to give some updates on the loanees every once in a while.
Any news/update would be welcome
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- treiz
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,984
- And1: 564
- Joined: Aug 17, 2005
- Location: London, England
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
MountainDrew wrote:I'm probably the only guy who's actually bothered by it though haha, as a Vitesse fan, just disliked the Chelsea commentators being so negative and uninformed about the team they were facing, but that is to be expected in a preseason game against a foreign opponent. I should stop talking about Vitesse in the Chelsea thread, although I might stop by to give some updates on the loanees every once in a while.
It's cool, I'm sure most of us here would like to see how our loanees are doing
Basically, please don't leave
Also, was Costa awesome today or what? Loved his performance, direct and very unselfish.
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- fatlever
- Senior Mod - Hornets

- Posts: 59,351
- And1: 15,903
- Joined: Jun 04, 2001
- Location: Terrapin Station
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
confirmed 28 mil pounds for lukaku, only 4 mil less pounds than we paid for costa.
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
- treiz
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,984
- And1: 564
- Joined: Aug 17, 2005
- Location: London, England
-
Re: Official Chelsea FC Thread
fatlever wrote:confirmed 28 mil pounds for lukaku, only 4 mil less pounds than we paid for costa.
Great bit of business there, get a better player and a more complete striker for Mourinho's system. Win-win for us definitely
Return to The General Soccer Board




