Yeah I personally have no clue.bwgood77 wrote:Slim Charless wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:Simmons mentioned that while Sarver can sell the whole thing there's belief hell just sell his 35% controlling stake. This would open up more options because actual cash needed at the sale would be less but that buyer would still control the team.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
I heard him say that too, but idk...I kinda feel the other owners will take the money and run especially if it's Bezos/Ellison. Those 2 guys are uber rich and probably won't want any other voices around with their new investment. Those 2 can also afford to pay off other people-even other rich people.
Simmons has no idea. A new billionaire owner will want sole investment. Plus, if it's worth 3+ billion, a 35% share would drastically increase the value of what the others put in, at least on paper. I would be pretty surprised if the owner didn't buy the whole team, or at least a minimum 51% of ownership.
Probably depends on how exactly that ownership agreement works. I do remember reading although Bob only owned 35% the others couldn't consolidate and do a hostile take over of his role as head of the group. So I guess if you get all the advantages of being the owner and 'only' have to fork over $1bil in actual cash vs $4bil I could see the appeal. But you wouldn't get that appreciation on the whole thing.
Frankly I don't really give a ****, just get Bob the hell away from this franchise.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app