bwgood77 wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
The key is getting good scouts. Of course you want to be a 7-10 seed over a bottom feeder because as we all know from experience picks can bust and you can be down there for years.
On top of that, if we are suddenly tanking, Book will surely want out and it could be years (if ever) you find a player as good as him again (depending on how high you rank him on the Suns all time list).
If you are a 7-10 seed you still have a pick in the mid teens and probably can get solid player with good scouts. And you also know you have good chemistry with your young guys and they learn how to compete.
Many wanted to trade for a star because they thought our window was short with CP3 maybe having a year or two left, but the team has shown they can compete for a top seed without him, and maybe are even better, even with a guy like Payne...
Which means that our window is not 1-2 years but likely much longer with Book, Ayton, Bridges, Cam and continuing to add pieces.
reasonable perspective. I personally see variances from that perspective. But then variety and differing perspectives are good for dialogue.
I couldn't read your entire earlier post but were you advocating getting rid of Book, Ayton and Bridges and being really bad to get good players or keeping them and not expecting us to be good with them 3? it's not like they have quality supporting pieces now...when it was just them with Payne and Craig and a crap bench they were in first place.
Not at all on the bolded statement man! More the 2nd stated premise, But With us offloading the contracts of Saric, Crowder, Shamet more for a player that's good but oft injured such as Hayward in order to get back other complimentary assets and you sit Booker more throughout the 2nd half of the season at varying periods for sustainability/load management towards his reoccurring injury concerns. And Hayward similarly too. Then run the team with Payne, Lee/ Bridges/ Landale/ Ayton with much more prevalence and increased roles given to Ayton and Bridges over this time. Forcing them to advance their games faster in more featured roles as primary options instead of 3rd or 4th options? Let these bench players work through their development with greater more meaningful playing time whilst escalating their value?
With Book/Hayward sitting for stretches and Paul, Crowder, Saric, Craig gone, even with Ayton and Bridges featured, As competitive as the west is, we'll likely finish at best in the 10-12th range by the end of the season and well within lottery consideration. So you do this to glean some assets in a consolidation trade for Hayward, and to glean some assets in a Paul trade and also through the lottery for one half season of suckage whilst advancing Ayton/ Bridges in a more featured role, and escalating our current remaining bench players value through increased playing time/ larger roles escalating the perceived value of our asset cache. You come back next season with a much healthier, hungrier Book, a more advanced Ayton and Bridges, a stronger bench through forced situational development =better value assets, a new billionaire owner with deep pockets and a target towards big name free agents in 2024 in one of Siakim, Porzingis, Derozan, JAYLEN BROWN, Sabonis, etc??