Ok, we've all seen Shaq repeatedly giving up layups to little guards in the last few games. Why don't they take him out for Swift or even Lou for defense at the end of these games??? Seems like a no brainer....
Shaq's useless on the pick and roll and if they're gonna play him with a bunch of smalls there's nobody to play center field and help defend against penetration. Swift would be great because of his quickness and mobility but they're not using him.
Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
- rag-time4
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,216
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 30, 2006
- Location: UC Davis, Cali
- Contact:
Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,261
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
-
Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
Because you don't take out your only offensive threat in the lane and give away the game that way, unless you have enough time outs to call so you can make O/D subs, or a player like Lebron/Kobe/Wade who can take over offensively even if its 5 on 1.

The underappreciated greats:

Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
- rag-time4
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,216
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 30, 2006
- Location: UC Davis, Cali
- Contact:
Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
sd1306 wrote:Because you don't take out your only offensive threat in the lane and give away the game that way, unless you have enough time outs to call so you can make O/D subs, or a player like Lebron/Kobe/Wade who can take over offensively even if its 5 on 1.
Shaq hasn't been the one shooting at the end of games, if I'm not mistaken, yet he's the one giving up layups in the lane. It's been said time and again that if the Suns can just get a defensive stop or two at the end of these games they could win, and Shaq keeps getting scored on by guards driving into the paint.
Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
- Inconspicuous
- Junior
- Posts: 276
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
then maybe our stupid guards can stop letting people blow by them. nash gambled on brooks on the gamewinner and because of that brooks was able to get to the rim

Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
- rag-time4
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,216
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 30, 2006
- Location: UC Davis, Cali
- Contact:
Re: Why not take out shaq for defensive purposes at the end??
In pick and roll situations the big man whose man is setting the pick is more important when defending a drive to the basket. The big man has to be able to prevent the guard from scoring after coming off the pick.Inconspicuous wrote:then maybe our stupid guards can stop letting people blow by them. nash gambled on brooks on the gamewinner and because of that brooks was able to get to the rim