Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,787
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
HAHA What is with it with warrior fans? Are they for real?

Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,548
- And1: 61
- Joined: Jan 10, 2006
-
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
As a dubs fan, I don't know what that guy is thinking.
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
- Ben_Dover
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,709
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jul 06, 2003
- Location: Oaktown
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
Let's get one thing clear before all you sensitive folks around here start dumping on me for a simple trade idea.
The trade going around for Amare that everyone's been talking about is:
Biedrins, BWright, Azubukie and/or Belinelli for Amare
RIGHT? I didn't make that up. That is the rumor all over the place (like it or not)
So when I heard folks talking about trading Nash too if Amare is traded, I was trying to think of a way to include him in the GSW's Amare trade. MY BAD!!! Didn't mean to add to an already sensitive subject.
So basically all I was doing was adding to the already existing trade idea:
My addition was:
Monta Ellis and a 2010 1st round pick
for
Nash
Is that really that HORRIBLE of an offer for him? I mean sure it might not be equal in talent at the moment, but Ellis is 23 and has his whole future ahead of him, while Nash is 36 and at best has a couple years. Plus there's a 2010 1st.
In all honesty I wouldn't do the Ellis for Nash straight up this late in Nash's career, but thought I'd throw him in to balance the lopsided deal being thrown around for Amare.
Anyways SORRY again for my HORRIBLE idea. I'll stop posting on your sensitive forum. You can go back to your Eddy Curry trade now.
The trade going around for Amare that everyone's been talking about is:
Biedrins, BWright, Azubukie and/or Belinelli for Amare
RIGHT? I didn't make that up. That is the rumor all over the place (like it or not)
So when I heard folks talking about trading Nash too if Amare is traded, I was trying to think of a way to include him in the GSW's Amare trade. MY BAD!!! Didn't mean to add to an already sensitive subject.
So basically all I was doing was adding to the already existing trade idea:
My addition was:
Monta Ellis and a 2010 1st round pick
for
Nash
Is that really that HORRIBLE of an offer for him? I mean sure it might not be equal in talent at the moment, but Ellis is 23 and has his whole future ahead of him, while Nash is 36 and at best has a couple years. Plus there's a 2010 1st.
In all honesty I wouldn't do the Ellis for Nash straight up this late in Nash's career, but thought I'd throw him in to balance the lopsided deal being thrown around for Amare.
Anyways SORRY again for my HORRIBLE idea. I'll stop posting on your sensitive forum. You can go back to your Eddy Curry trade now.
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,787
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
Ben_Dover wrote:Let's get one thing clear before all you sensitive folks around here start dumping on me for a simple trade idea.
The trade going around for Amare that everyone's been talking about is:
Biedrins, BWright, Azubukie and/or Belinelli for Amare
RIGHT? I didn't make that up. That is the rumor all over the place (like it or not)
So when I heard folks talking about trading Nash too if Amare is traded, I was trying to think of a way to include him in the GSW's Amare trade. MY BAD!!! Didn't mean to add to an already sensitive subject.
So basically all I was doing was adding to the already existing trade idea:
My addition was:
Monta Ellis and a 2010 1st round pick
for
Nash
Is that really that HORRIBLE of an offer for him? I mean sure it might not be equal in talent at the moment, but Ellis is 23 and has his whole future ahead of him, while Nash is 36 and at best has a couple years. Plus there's a 2010 1st.
In all honesty I wouldn't do the Ellis for Nash straight up this late in Nash's career, but thought I'd throw him in to balance the lopsided deal being thrown around for Amare.
Anyways SORRY again for my HORRIBLE idea. I'll stop posting on your sensitive forum. You can go back to your Eddy Curry trade now.
Go ride a moped.

Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 933
- And1: 50
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,787
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
portlandoden wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=lecnss
Saw this on Y!A![]()
Awesome, now we can have 20 players on our roster


Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,548
- And1: 61
- Joined: Jan 10, 2006
-
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
- Ben_Dover
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,709
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jul 06, 2003
- Location: Oaktown
Re: Coro: if Suns keep Amare, then trading Nash is an option
ginobiliflops wrote:
Go ride a moped.

