ImageImageImage

Randolph vs Clark and Rebuilding

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Randolph vs Clark and Rebuilding 

Post#61 » by JohnVancouver » Wed Jul 8, 2009 9:35 pm

TASTIC wrote:What a joke. I can see hmmm...nobody paying him that. Wouldn't surprise me if ORL move a piece or two and try put him next to Howard for $8-$9m, he'd be going home to Florida


I think Lee and Marion are the two guys who get nothing like what they hoped for this off-season. Just circumstance - who was it said they were intereste din lee but were afraid the Knicks woudl just match and then they'd ahve missed someone else they could have got.
That makes it tough for him.

Why haven't we heard anything about NY talking to Shawn?
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
User avatar
Sun Scorched
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,736
And1: 280
Joined: Aug 01, 2007
   

Re: Randolph vs Clark and Rebuilding 

Post#62 » by Sun Scorched » Wed Jul 8, 2009 9:58 pm

JohnVancouver wrote:Why haven't we heard anything about NY talking to Shawn?


That's a really good point. Why... haven't.... we....?
Image
On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
User avatar
aIvin adams
Analyst
Posts: 3,042
And1: 1,977
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Randolph vs Clark and Rebuilding 

Post#63 » by aIvin adams » Wed Jul 8, 2009 10:23 pm

Sun Scorched wrote:
JohnVancouver wrote:Why haven't we heard anything about NY talking to Shawn?


That's a really good point. Why... haven't.... we....?


well they wouldnt want to tie up cap space in him long-term im guessing. pretty clever contract offers to ghill..
Image
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Randolph vs Clark and Rebuilding 

Post#64 » by old rem » Thu Jul 9, 2009 10:17 am

sd1306 wrote:
TASTIC wrote:you lost me when you said "Lopez can develop into a Biedrins type player, easy"


Biedrins is overrated because he plays that style. On any other team, he would score 6 points and grab 9 rebounds. He's a horrendous shooter, can't hit free throws, and even if he does volume rebound, his stats are so high because he's usually the only true big on the court EVER for the W's. Lopez can easily match his defensive abilities, and he's way more athletic and easily already a better shot blocker. He needs PT, that's all. We should trade Wallace for a TPE (to Denver maybe, for Klieza S&T + 9mil TPE), we'll throw in 2 future seconds if they want. This would allow Lopez time to develop, and we'd have a very talented starting lineup.

Amar'e/Lopez/Amundson
Clark/Amundson/Dudley
Klieza/Dudley/Tucker
JRich/Barbosa/Tucker
Nash/Dragic/Barbosa

Complete run & gun dominance, basically. Lopez/Amare/Clark/JRich/Nash could also work :)


Biedrins over the last 4 yr is #1 in FG % in the NBA. Not bad for a "horrendous shooter" GSW has never wanted or needed him to shoot from deep. I saw Ro-Lo in college,often,and he's a decent backup but NOT as athletic as Biedrins or as good at anything.

You can not combine Kleiza and a TPE. Not legal Would make no sense for Denver if they COULD do it.

I guess if Biedrins had teammates competing for RBDs...he would get a few less...but he did board well back when Murphy was around and grabbing 10+.

Clark has talent. None of his various skills are yet polished to the point you can depend on them.
He is not A Randolph....AR has more quickness and an uncanny ability to stretch out even longer.
If Clark gets Randolph's motor...then there's a real similarity.

I too hope the GSW/Suns Amare deal is dead.

I prefer Biedrins at WAY less $ ..to Amare. GSW giving B Wright as mere filler is what makes it a no-win for GSW.
CENSORED... No comment.
dantian
Starter
Posts: 2,015
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 23, 2005

Re: Randolph vs Clark and Rebuilding 

Post#65 » by dantian » Thu Jul 9, 2009 11:55 am

Clark is a project. If Hill was gone, Dudley would start ahead of him, no doubt. James Johnson would have a better chance at contributing as rookie already.

Return to Phoenix Suns