ImageImageImage

So Um.m..

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

mr-EEE
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 12, 2008
Location: UNKNOWN

So Um.m.. 

Post#1 » by mr-EEE » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:49 pm

so uhh...... How 'bout those knicks?? 8-)
"to be the man, you got to beat the man" -RICK FOX (3 Time NBA Champion)
realsunsfan
Rookie
Posts: 1,222
And1: 132
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
 

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#2 » by realsunsfan » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:50 pm

what about em ???
User avatar
azballer53
Junior
Posts: 480
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 09, 2009

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#3 » by azballer53 » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:50 pm

they suck and if they dont get ramon there future doesnt look bright
Image
Kerrsed wrote:Over/under: By mid season all Lopez interviews will come with subtitles?
User avatar
Stix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,337
And1: 2,655
Joined: Jul 26, 2007
Location: Phoenix
 

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#4 » by Stix » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:54 pm

FAIL. look at his sig...

IBTL
User avatar
MaryvalesFinest
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Location: Back

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#5 » by MaryvalesFinest » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:08 pm

Well...

They should have drafted Brandon Jennings, he would have exploded in D'antoni's system. I liked the Toney Douglas pick for them but Jennings would have been a perfect fit for the Knicks. As for FA I don't get what their trying to do but they should look to re-sign Nate Robinson and do a sign and trade with David Lee.
User avatar
TheMan44
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,431
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2009

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#6 » by TheMan44 » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:43 pm

The knicks?

well, the knicks have proven that D'Antoni is not a basketball God genius afterall and that it was Steve Nash who made the engine run in Phoenix. Without Nash, D'Antoni is toast and the Knicks stink.

(u can argue the other way around too - saying Suns were better w/ D'Antoni. So i guess both sides - Nash and D'Antoni - ONLY work well together and fail when apart)
"Lead, follow, or get out of the way." -Thomas Paine
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#7 » by JohnVancouver » Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:07 pm

Sunsman44 wrote:The knicks?

well, the knicks have proven that D'Antoni is not a basketball God genius afterall and that it was Steve Nash who made the engine run in Phoenix. Without Nash, D'Antoni is toast and the Knicks stink.

(u can argue the other way around too - saying Suns were better w/ D'Antoni. So i guess both sides - Nash and D'Antoni - ONLY work well together and fail when apart)


Oh, I think Mike D did all rright - +9 wins form last season, with a linup that was constantly changing and two of its highest paid stars, and I use the term advisedly, on the bench or in the stands for the entire season. (Curry and Steph)

Walsh is assembling a solid young crew and while sessions would be nice, he doesn't have Nash's shot, which is a huge part of what makes his game work. If you know the guy has to pass because he can't hit the shot ... is a problem Nash has never had.

I agree maybe Douglas was not the guy some would have chosen but he looks good so far

If they can keep Lee somehow, with Chandler at the 2/3, Gallinari healthy, Toney Douglas and Jordan Hill (who looks okay if not great) - that's just a universe away from the hodgepodge of headcases and morbidly obese retards Isiah had cobbled together.

I think they make the playoffs next year, and Walsh is nowhere near done. A guy they ought to add, in my opinion, is Coby Karl - cheap, plays D, has a good all-round game, no ego, ready to work.
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
User avatar
TASTIC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,410
And1: 2,425
Joined: May 17, 2004
Location: New Zealand
   

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#8 » by TASTIC » Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:29 pm

Seriously this offseason the thread creating has been a joke

If you're going to start a thread, make a point. or it's going to have a short shelf life - and don't just post and not bother to make a legit conversation, it's annoying and frustrates everyone
realsunsfan
Rookie
Posts: 1,222
And1: 132
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
 

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#9 » by realsunsfan » Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:36 pm

TASTIC wrote:Seriously this offseason the thread creating has been a joke

If you're going to start a thread, make a point. or it's going to have a short shelf life - and don't just post and not bother to make a legit conversation, it's annoying and frustrates everyone


Hey TASTIC, I think this was just somebodies (Please Use More Appropriate Word) joke because of all the post about not creating the useless threads. It is getting really irritating..........
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#10 » by Kerrsed » Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:41 pm

TASTIC wrote:Seriously this offseason the thread creating has been a joke

If you're going to start a thread, make a point. or it's going to have a short shelf life - and don't just post and not bother to make a legit conversation, it's annoying and frustrates everyone



Image
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
mr-EEE
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 12, 2008
Location: UNKNOWN

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#11 » by mr-EEE » Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:34 pm

HEY i just want to see the thoughts on the knicks, ok pancho
"to be the man, you got to beat the man" -RICK FOX (3 Time NBA Champion)
User avatar
TASTIC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,410
And1: 2,425
Joined: May 17, 2004
Location: New Zealand
   

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#12 » by TASTIC » Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:02 am

why not post YOUR thoughts on it as well then?

we literally have zero interest in the Knicks...D'Antoni left on bad terms and with Marbury and Q gone there aren't any connections there

Imagine if I went on the Knicks board and posted:

"So Um.m..."
so uhh...... How 'bout those Suns??
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,165
And1: 6,895
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#13 » by DirtyDez » Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:44 am

Think D'Antoni is second guessing choosing NY over Chicago? I would, just after he declined the Bulls job they won the lottery and got D Rose... Ouch
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,179
And1: 24,530
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#14 » by lilfishi22 » Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:29 am

lol I can imagine Tastic's frustration. Bet you wanna just ban these dudes but you gotta give some warning first etc etc
User avatar
Orange_Blooded
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,874
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 23, 2006
Location: San Diego

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#15 » by Orange_Blooded » Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:39 am

This whole post is a joke, should have at least had a valid title. "So Um.m.." Sounds like something someone would drunkenly write to a girl on myspace.

I'd love to discuss NY or any other team but not on a waste of a thread like this.
Image
User avatar
TXSun
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,953
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 03, 2008

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#16 » by TXSun » Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:36 am

yet this thread has managed to get 14 replies, wait make it 15 with mine.
"This is some bull $hit"
User avatar
Miklo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,674
And1: 278
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: North Carolina
     

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#17 » by Miklo » Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:54 am

TXSun wrote:yet this thread has managed to get 14 replies, wait make it 15 with mine.


that's what trolls do!
User avatar
Risensun
Pro Prospect
Posts: 752
And1: 26
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: The Grave...

Re: So Um.m.. 

Post#18 » by Risensun » Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:09 am

The knicks? Last I checked this was a Phoenix Suns basketball board.


I'm struggling to figure out how they would be relevant on this or any board while we're at it. How bout those knicks? Last I checked they sucked so if you're looking for reassurance on that great.


Don't get too excited about Sessions either. He can't shoot a lick. Teams will just back off him and defend the pass. On a normal team they could adjust but with Dantoni's offense it will spell disaster.


So welcome, and goodbye. I can't see anything making them relevant for the next few years, or warranting another A$$clown thread like this forever.

Return to Phoenix Suns