the_warden wrote:First, "the best form of insurance IS a federal plan.... just ask your congressman if he will give his up..." is completely unrelated to the issue at hand. Congressmen have health care because health care has been tied to employment. I don't think that's a smart thing, but whatever. To then say, "Oh, that means government health care is great!" is not a good argument because the cost would be far too great for every person in the country to have that health care.
My comment was 'tongue in cheek' in nature. The health care and retirement plans our congress has, is far superior and costs them less than any group plan out there. Its clear that IT is one thing that will not CHANGE. I am not suggesting it is a plan for the masses, for I am sure, the Congress' employer(s) are paying dearly for the coverage.
Tying health care to employment has been the corporate directive from day one. Tax policy has encouraged that. Now we are seeing businesses, especially small ones, getting pinched due to the rising costs. Should it be mandatory for the business to offer coverage ?
And furthermore.... our congress has allowed Medicare to hemorrhage into the state it is in... nobody wanted to make a hard decision or even mess with it for fear of voter back lash. Say one thing about changing Medicare that can be negatively twisted by your political adversaries, and you will have 3 busloads of AARP-ers at your office (after breakfast at Hardies) If Medicare was a healthy entity, and the gov had displayed the ability to run it properly, with out the excessive fraud, it would be much easier for people to grasp a federal plan option for everyone. Same with the VA... if they could actually get it functioning to the point of participative approval. Nobody has ANY confidence in DC anymore.
We are precariously requesting these corporate-puppets to turn the mountain into a molehill.
But something has to be done.
What kind of plan do you have ??? Warden ? Impulse ? Ma Dog ? Go7? Bueller ? Bueller ?
When was the last time you 'applied' for individual coverage ? If you have group insurance, do you know how much the 'Cobra' plan will be if you are laid off ? Any of you have any pre-existing conditions ?
I'm not fightpicking here, nor trying to define anyone by their situation...
I am just curious as to how many have actually 'tested' the private market lately. I have... and it certainly has changed my ideas on the whole thing. Just hope, if/when that time comes, you have more options than what is presently out there.
I can only assume this... but I'd bet, the biggest noisemakers at these townholler meetings have good affordable health insurance. And it seems most are 62+.