I can't believe that a thread about how stupid Amare is, turned into an even dumber thread of Marbury being better than Steve.
Go to basketball reference and check out the stats. Steve is way more efficient. 49% fg, 43% threes, and 90% ft for a career. How in all that is holy could someone argue against that with a 43%, 33%, 78%? This isn't poker, you can't bluff us. It isn't even a contest. That is a 6%, 10%, 12% difference, for a career! That is like trying to tell us that three tens and two eights are better that three queens and two nines. Sorry, but it doesn't work.
Sure Marbury scored more points, but Nash took less shots to make his points, meaning if he was to take the same amount of shots, he could have scored more easily. That is the problem with people that don't know the game of basketball. They don't know how to read the stats.
Also you have to take into consideration that Nash started his career behind both KJ and Kidd, where Marbury went to Minny and could easily start on that cruddy team. Once Nash was consistently starting his numbers reflected it.
In the so-called year in question, Marbury took 17.8 shots a game and made only 7.7. Nash, the year before SSOL, took 10.8 and made 5.1. Nash made players better because he was a better teammate, Marbury only cared about stats. And the block shot comment

for a career, they both avg 0.1. By the way, Nash out rebounds Starbury for a career.
The opinions of the feeble minded are easily destroyed by cold hard facts.
Back on topic, did someone slap some sense into Amare yet? "His best year yet", according to his tweet. I hope to god that he will follow through with his word.

Just once would be nice.
Now I don't hate Amare, but I can't stand all the talk, and the half attempt. Either follow your talk up, or just shut up and play.