
Clark or Amundson?
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Re: Clark or Amundson?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 536
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 22, 2009
Re: Clark or Amundson?
He'll play 8 minutes a game to start and if he performs well, his minutes will improve. if he doesn't they may decrease. It's how anyone on the team works. If they do good, they get more minutes, if not, they get less. It's logic people, common! 


Re: Clark or Amundson?
- Mjee
- Starter
- Posts: 2,273
- And1: 2,160
- Joined: Sep 16, 2009
Re: Clark or Amundson?
I agree with you but I see him playing 10-15 minutes per game......maybe more maybe less....it depends on if he produces. I don't even think Gentry knows how much Earl is going to play. We will just have to wait and see!
Re: Clark or Amundson?
- impulsenine
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 10, 2007
- Location: Tucson
- Contact:
Re: Clark or Amundson?
JohnVancouver wrote:Stories in Canadian media have Dave Love, a shooting coach who runs camps up here, being hired as Sweet Lou's shooting coach. That's a good sign - I would think Nash had something to do with the hiring. he would know Dave from his involvement in basketball Canada.
Lou for MIP .... unless Duds wins it
Lou shooting well from the outside makes him 10x more useful than he is right now. That would be freaking AWESOME.
I <3 Lou, but if I ever see him playing center against a decent team, I will be very sad because something horrible has happened.
Re: Clark or Amundson?
- TheMan44
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,431
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 09, 2009
Re: Clark or Amundson?
Yeah I don't see Clark getting a whole lot of minutes IF Amundson ends up getting the backup PF job.
Outside the backup PF job (along with some center minutes if Lopez decides to not show up in games), there won't be any time for Clark at small forward.
Why no small forward time? Because Hill, Dudley, and sometimes JRich (when Barbosa is playing SG) will gobble up all that time. And let's not forget garbage small forward minutes for Alando Tucker and Taylor Griffin.
Clark will definitely NOT play small forward as there is no time for him there. Remember, Dudley is well heralded this season and is supposed to be having a breakout year with his work ethic and increased load. All this when u still have Hill at small forward.
Clark at SF is impossible.
Outside the backup PF job (along with some center minutes if Lopez decides to not show up in games), there won't be any time for Clark at small forward.
Why no small forward time? Because Hill, Dudley, and sometimes JRich (when Barbosa is playing SG) will gobble up all that time. And let's not forget garbage small forward minutes for Alando Tucker and Taylor Griffin.
Clark will definitely NOT play small forward as there is no time for him there. Remember, Dudley is well heralded this season and is supposed to be having a breakout year with his work ethic and increased load. All this when u still have Hill at small forward.
Clark at SF is impossible.
"Lead, follow, or get out of the way." -Thomas Paine
Re: Clark or Amundson?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,264
- And1: 10,075
- Joined: Nov 07, 2006
Re: Clark or Amundson?
The only givens , minute wise for this team are Hill 20-25, Nash 30-35 and Amare 35-40.
the rest are up for grabs, and IMO, will be determined by WHO we are playing as much as HOW they (the rest of the Suns) are playing. Our strengths lie in mismatches.
the rest are up for grabs, and IMO, will be determined by WHO we are playing as much as HOW they (the rest of the Suns) are playing. Our strengths lie in mismatches.
What ? Me Worry ?
Re: Clark or Amundson?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,222
- And1: 132
- Joined: Feb 09, 2009
-
Re: Clark or Amundson?
Frank Lee wrote:The only givens , minute wise for this team are Hill 20-25, Nash 30-35 and Amare 35-40.
the rest are up for grabs, and IMO, will be determined by WHO we are playing as much as HOW they (the rest of the Suns) are playing. Our strengths lie in mismatches.
I agree with you on that 100% there Frankie........
Re: Clark or Amundson?
- WTFsunsFTW
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,700
- And1: 113
- Joined: Aug 04, 2007
-
Re: Clark or Amundson?
Barbosa is a 20+ given as well imo
Re: Clark or Amundson?
- TASTIC
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,410
- And1: 2,425
- Joined: May 17, 2004
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: Clark or Amundson?
I see them like this
Amare 34
JRich 33
Nash 31
Barbosa 28
Hill 28
Frye 24
Dudley 18
Dragic 16
Clark 14
Lopez 12
Lou 12
Tucker...meh
Griffin....meh
Something like that...I think we're going to see a lot of
Amare
Dudley/Clark
JRich
Barbosa
Nash
Amare 34
JRich 33
Nash 31
Barbosa 28
Hill 28
Frye 24
Dudley 18
Dragic 16
Clark 14
Lopez 12
Lou 12
Tucker...meh
Griffin....meh
Something like that...I think we're going to see a lot of
Amare
Dudley/Clark
JRich
Barbosa
Nash
Re: Clark or Amundson?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 536
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 22, 2009
Re: Clark or Amundson?
I don't think Dudley will play any power forward this season, but I do see that lineup with Clark to be played a bit, but I don't think it will be played a lot. Maybe once a game or once every couple games. replace JRich with Hill or Dudley, and that lineup will happen much more often I think.

Re: Clark or Amundson?
- nashrambler13
- Suns Forum Returning Poster of the Year
- Posts: 1,347
- And1: 180
- Joined: Aug 22, 2009
-
Re: Clark or Amundson?
TASTIC wrote:I see them like this
Amare 34
JRich 33
Nash 31
Barbosa 28
Hill 28
Frye 24
Dudley 18
Dragic 16
Clark 14
Lopez 12
Lou 12
Tucker...meh
Griffin....meh
Something like that...I think we're going to see a lot of
Amare
Dudley/Clark
JRich
Barbosa
Nash
these minutes are perfect.