ImageImageImage

It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

Mr. Sun
General Manager
Posts: 9,927
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#1 » by Mr. Sun » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:41 am

"Seven seconds or less" was a bit of a fallacy too. The Suns' target was 14 seconds, the time that then-coach Mike D'Antoni put on the shot clock in scrimmages.

Up-tempo offense no longer shocks opponents' systems. More teams play faster than they did at the outset of the Nash-D'Antoni pairing. Hill noted how teams are better prepared for it.

"Maybe we'll be good enough on defense where everybody will start playing defense like us too," Hill said.

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/ar ... tsadv.html
garrick
Head Coach
Posts: 7,336
And1: 4,054
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
     

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#2 » by garrick » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:51 am

Having Marion really helped with fastbreaks because he could break away so quickly, how many times have we seen the opposing team celebrate a quick dunk or layup and then have Marion sneak past for a easy dunk on the ensuing play.
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,165
And1: 6,895
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#3 » by DirtyDez » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:52 am

Nash to Marion alley oop = greatest play of all-time
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
User avatar
raff
RealGM
Posts: 15,659
And1: 329
Joined: Dec 02, 2004
Location: Brisbane
 

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#4 » by raff » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:08 am

DirtyDez wrote:Nash to Marion alley oop = greatest play of all-time


One of the greatest...

Mr. Sun wrote:
"Maybe we'll be good enough on defense where everybody will start playing defense like us too," Hill said.


Hahahahaha...let's not get carried away.
GO SUNS!
User avatar
Sun Scorched
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,736
And1: 280
Joined: Aug 01, 2007
   

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#5 » by Sun Scorched » Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:23 pm

14 may have been the target in practice, but SSOL referred to how quickly we usually scored in transition during games.
Image
On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#6 » by rsavaj » Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:58 pm

The idea that we're not running as much b/c our wings have to stay and rebound suggests that maybe our bigs should step up and rebound the ball themselves! Boxing out so that Rich and Hill can get the rebound is nice, but boxing out so that YOU can get the rebound and then throw it down the court to a streaking Hill or Rich is even better.

Man, our bigs suck at rebounding.
User avatar
Miklo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,674
And1: 278
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: North Carolina
     

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#7 » by Miklo » Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:06 pm

rsavaj wrote:The idea that we're not running as much b/c our wings have to stay and rebound suggests that maybe our bigs should step up and rebound the ball themselves! Boxing out so that Rich and Hill can get the rebound is nice, but boxing out so that YOU can get the rebound and then throw it down the court to a streaking Hill or Rich is even better.

Man, our bigs suck at rebounding.


can I get an AMEN

Boxing out for wings does NOT feed the fast break. Good solid rebounding IN THE PAINT speeds the process up. While a 3 point specialist at the 5 spot may seem like a good complement to a scoring team, I completely agree that without a rebounding big you are just gonna clog up the fast break.

A more ideal starting 5 for that reason would be
PG Nash
SG Barbs
SF Rich
PF Hill
C Amare

or Amar'e and Lou at the 4 and 5. Or even Duds/Hill/Amare at 3/4/5

This way you have 3 VERY solid 3 point threats to spread the backcourt, and you start Hill or Lou in the frontcourt to do the dirty work. Frye still plays his minutes but does not start.

Not saying I want this rotation, plus if it ain't broke don't fix it, but that's just a little bit of brainstorming.

Then you slide your guys down position-wise as you make subs. Frye comes in and still plays his minutes, but he does so with a slightly different complementary lineup.
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#8 » by JohnVancouver » Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:59 pm

our bigs are suck rebounders but our swingmen are decent passers - the bigs can break downcourt, at least Amar'e can. Not ideal but ..... also it occurred to me the other night while watching the game that while we aren't getting the fastbreak like we did, we do now have a decent halfcourt offense. Which is a nice thing for the playoffs
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
dantian
Starter
Posts: 2,015
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 23, 2005

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#9 » by dantian » Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:09 pm

Now, what I have been observing with the new Suns is official: despite scoring so much, we are NOT a running team a la DA's anymore. And we adjust to situations when Nash is cut off from doing his things by going to isos with Amare, which is a great way to prepare for playoffs anyway. Keep up the good work, Gentry, and Nash, and Amare..!
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#10 » by rsavaj » Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:00 pm

DirtyDez wrote:Nash to Marion alley oop = greatest play of all-time


I loved the Diaw to Marion oop as well. That was a set play that we ran so many times....:(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlQYxe_M7hM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL5AjJo__yw
User avatar
MaryvalesFinest
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Location: Back

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#11 » by MaryvalesFinest » Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:09 pm

I thought they were running...ah well as long as they win game that's all that counts :lol:
doc shivers
Banned User
Posts: 404
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2009

Re: It was Fourteen Seconds or Less, Not Seven 

Post#12 » by doc shivers » Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:15 am

why don't we run the nash to barbs backdoor on the baseline cut anymore? we used to run that thing once a game back in the day.

Return to Phoenix Suns