MaryvalesFinest wrote:Suns win
118-113
Yes they did




Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
MaryvalesFinest wrote:Suns win
118-113
Thugmelo wrote:Hey whin uhm i mean suns fans, if you actually won a championship than maybe stern would give you a better schedule to start the season. You guys talk about the lakers as if you are some sort of imposing force. You guys whooped LA for 3 years. You had a chance of winning a championship but always came short. LA got their chance and clinched the deal. Sour grapes. The phoenix suns will not win a championship in our lifetime. You will make the playoffs but get bounched early. Nash will break down, Amare isn't the superstar you thought he was. You will be stuck in mediocrity.
Great time to be a suns fan
AlciG wrote:BurningHeart wrote:The scheduling complaint is flat out freakin' stupid. We all play the same games and same teams. HOWEVER, my complaint is that there's no reason for the scheduling to be so imbalanced. Why should the Lakers have cake at home early then be on the road so much so late? Why should the Suns be everywhere and go through rough stretches early then have a drastically easier time later on? Just make it even. Makes no sense.
I can respect that.
I don't know about the Suns, but the Lakers always have a home heavy schedule to start the season because of the Staples Centre schedule lateron.
JohnVancouver wrote:We are who we are, and so are they. I would just like to see a little more of the Rockets' balls and heart in our guys. We seem to have lost some of what we had - losing will do that, I know, adn I hate to use the word Swagger but we need some of that
hourockman wrote:The Suns are an offensive team that doesn't bang and they're short.
ginobiliflops wrote:Thugmelo wrote:Hey whin uhm i mean suns fans, if you actually won a championship than maybe stern would give you a better schedule to start the season. You guys talk about the lakers as if you are some sort of imposing force. You guys whooped LA for 3 years. You had a chance of winning a championship but always came short. LA got their chance and clinched the deal. Sour grapes. The phoenix suns will not win a championship in our lifetime. You will make the playoffs but get bounched early. Nash will break down, Amare isn't the superstar you thought he was. You will be stuck in mediocrity.
Great time to be a suns fan
Hey since you can predict the future, which stocks should we all invest in?
Tenacious Spur wrote:Suns did the correct thing letting him go. How they spended their money is the money.
Classick wrote:BurningHeart wrote:Classick wrote:I wish I could say that missing Barbosa and Almondson was a good excuse for getting dominated like we did.
I'll still sticking with the back to back excuse though.
Why do you need an excuse? How about the simple fact that we're simply not as good as them, and are unable to combat terrible officiating with our performance otherwise?
Well clearly I wasn't being serious- but we lost by 20+ because it was a back to back. What else explains us keeping it relatively close in the first quarter in both games, then it being blown wide open in the second/third? Fatigue. That's how most back to backs are. That's why they're ruining basketball. But the sad part is that they're never going to stop because they're a sure way for David Stern to dictate how his West/East rankings end up.
Maybe the Lakers ARE better than the Suns, but it has yet to be proven. I don't know about you- but the fact that both of our games against LA have been on the back end of back to backs proves absolutely nothing other than David Stern is a genius.
JohnVancouver wrote:--- Trust me on this - it's been proven. The Lakers are a better team right now. They were also a better team last year. My theory is that being better helped them win league championship.
It's no knock on my beloved Suns to say that LA simply has more firepower and one of the two most game-changing players in the league today. It is what it is, get used to it.
I do think that playing at our absolute peak with this lineup we can give them a run for it but we would lose a seven-game series at least eight out of 10 times. Loving my team does not mean I have to believe in nonsense.
I love my mother but in a game of 21 in the driveway, I'm taking LeBron, even though Mom has homecourt advantage.
Classick wrote:JohnVancouver wrote:--- Trust me on this - it's been proven. The Lakers are a better team right now. They were also a better team last year. My theory is that being better helped them win league championship.
It's no knock on my beloved Suns to say that LA simply has more firepower and one of the two most game-changing players in the league today. It is what it is, get used to it.
I do think that playing at our absolute peak with this lineup we can give them a run for it but we would lose a seven-game series at least eight out of 10 times. Loving my team does not mean I have to believe in nonsense.
I love my mother but in a game of 21 in the driveway, I'm taking LeBron, even though Mom has homecourt advantage.
Last year, the Suns beat the Lakers when Steve Nash and Amare were both out. We were a much better match up last year than this year.
TASTIC wrote:We lost on the road, to the CHAMPIONS, after a win the night before. Was anyone expecting a win?
I certainly wasn't.
The schedule's unfortunate, but look at the Lakers sched after new years, it's brutal.
I'd rather have ours - we're 16 and 6 with ALL those road games, I think they're far outperforming where I initially had us. Much rather finish with an easier run
TASTIC wrote:We lost on the road, to the CHAMPIONS, after a win the night before. Was anyone expecting a win?
I certainly wasn't.
The schedule's unfortunate, but look at the Lakers sched after new years, it's brutal.
I'd rather have ours - we're 16 and 6 with ALL those road games, I think they're far outperforming where I initially had us. Much rather finish with an easier run