ImageImageImage

Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

User avatar
grumpysaddle
RealGM
Posts: 20,937
And1: 14,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Location: San Diego
     

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#301 » by grumpysaddle » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:18 pm

the 18 game TNT losing streak doesn't exactly bolster confidence, either.
Image
User avatar
sunsfan13az
Junior
Posts: 350
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 21, 2008

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#302 » by sunsfan13az » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:30 pm

Oh great is the dallas game on tnt tomorrow? Well if so 2 game losing streak coming up :( sigh
hunterxaz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,975
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 17, 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#303 » by hunterxaz » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:02 pm

Bobcats were like 3-17 on the road too... and they're a <500 win team. :/ We're like 26-21 now... crazy
The Phoenix Suns - 54-28. Projected Record: 54-28 3rd Seed

The Phoenix Suns - 2010-2011 Projected Record: 30-52 3rd lottery pick.
hunterxaz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,975
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 17, 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#304 » by hunterxaz » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:02 pm

For some reason I can believe the Suns will win tomorrow. Big confidence game, and the Mavs are good. We'll come out with heart and energy and wanting to shrug off this BS we've been going through.
The Phoenix Suns - 54-28. Projected Record: 54-28 3rd Seed

The Phoenix Suns - 2010-2011 Projected Record: 30-52 3rd lottery pick.
User avatar
grumpysaddle
RealGM
Posts: 20,937
And1: 14,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Location: San Diego
     

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#305 » by grumpysaddle » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:00 pm

bobcats aren't a <.500 team. they are .500 now. and they haven't been playing like a <.500 team since their terrible start to the season. over the past couple weeks i think you've moved past MVF territory on a scale of 1-Idiotic.

ever since the suns hot start ended they've been a subpar <.500 team. maybe the bobcats got a witch doctor to switch the suns mojo with their mojo... ... ... mojo . mojo
Image
hunterxaz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,975
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 17, 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#306 » by hunterxaz » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:45 pm

We should beat every team we play with a worse record than us. Especially < .500 teams, like the Bobcats were, last night.
The Phoenix Suns - 54-28. Projected Record: 54-28 3rd Seed

The Phoenix Suns - 2010-2011 Projected Record: 30-52 3rd lottery pick.
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#307 » by Kerrsed » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:31 am

hunterxaz wrote:We should beat every team we play with a worse record than us. Especially < .500 teams, like the Bobcats were, last night.


:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
User avatar
grumpysaddle
RealGM
Posts: 20,937
And1: 14,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Location: San Diego
     

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#308 » by grumpysaddle » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:49 am

Kerrsed wrote:
hunterxaz wrote:We should beat every team we play with a worse record than us. Especially < .500 teams, like the Bobcats were, last night.


:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Image
hunterxaz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,975
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 17, 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#309 » by hunterxaz » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:42 am

Lol... we should guys. It's called being dominating. If you let one slip here or there, like the Lakers, Cavs, etc -- that's ok -- but we should whip the crap out of teams w/ a poor record -- because other people have too.
The Phoenix Suns - 54-28. Projected Record: 54-28 3rd Seed

The Phoenix Suns - 2010-2011 Projected Record: 30-52 3rd lottery pick.
User avatar
grumpysaddle
RealGM
Posts: 20,937
And1: 14,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Location: San Diego
     

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#310 » by grumpysaddle » Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:20 am

grumpysaddle wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:
hunterxaz wrote:We should beat every team we play with a worse record than us. Especially < .500 teams, like the Bobcats were, last night.


:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Image
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#311 » by RunDogGun » Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:30 am

I was thinking today (actually still steaming) about why JRich played so many minutes the last two games, despite sucking so badly. Are they trying to showcase him to trade him? Did he catch on, and that is why he did just enough to get by, but not enough to help this team win? :dontknow:
sunfire0112
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,264
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Hawai'i

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#312 » by sunfire0112 » Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:09 am

RunDogGun wrote:I was thinking today (actually still steaming) about why JRich played so many minutes the last two games, despite sucking so badly. Are they trying to showcase him to trade him? Did he catch on, and that is why he did just enough to get by, but not enough to help this team win? :dontknow:


...Wait, don't get my hopes up! :wavefinger:

But if it turns out you're right... :bowdown:
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#313 » by RunDogGun » Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:47 am

sunfire0112 wrote:
RunDogGun wrote:I was thinking today (actually still steaming) about why JRich played so many minutes the last two games, despite sucking so badly. Are they trying to showcase him to trade him? Did he catch on, and that is why he did just enough to get by, but not enough to help this team win? :dontknow:


...Wait, don't get my hopes up! :wavefinger:

But if it turns out you're right... :bowdown:


Well it is the only thing that makes sense. It was clear that JRich was not helping our cause, yet he remained in the line-up. Even at the three, while having to guard AK47 and Wallace. I don't see the point in that. Now if he was as good as Marion on defense, I could see that, or if he was unstoppable on offense. But from the second half on in the Utah game he was 0 for 6, and in the Cats game he was 2 for 12. Nowhere near clutch, and he allowed many rebounds by his man.

Maybe I was too harsh on Gentry, maybe his orders came from Kerr and Sarver to play JRich as much as possible to see if any team wants him. Too bad he sucked horribly and helped cause us to lose two in a row. It is starting to seem like we are just trying to play guys to see if other teams want them, instead of trying to win ballgames. :o
sunfire0112
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,264
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Hawai'i

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#314 » by sunfire0112 » Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:58 am

If only that were true. :pray:

But with Gentry's rotations (especially late-game rotations) all screwed up, I don't know how feasible that is.

:pray: :pray: :pray:
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#315 » by RunDogGun » Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:59 am

And it makes even more sense why Nash is shooting more at the end of games, knowing that they are supposed to pass to both JRich and Amare, but both of them just hold on to the ball or give it away. Not wanting to play into the FO's plans. Maybe both JRich and Amare know what is going on. It seemed like that for a bit, and then (at least Amare) says F-that, and tries just to win even though that is what they are showcasing him for.

It seems like a bad time to be a player and fan. :( Such a shame with how they started and all the fun they were having.
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: Game 47: Charlotte @ Phoenix 

Post#316 » by RunDogGun » Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:06 am

sunfire0112 wrote:If only that were true. :pray:

But with Gentry's rotations (especially late-game rotations) all screwed up, I don't know how feasible that is.

:pray: :pray: :pray:


But when I saw Goran go in, but JRich NOT come out, it didn't make sense. It is not like JRich can set up plays like Hill. Plus we all saw well Goran, Dudley, Lou, Frye, and either Amare or Lopez played down the stretch of games. Or Nash, Goran, Dudley, Lou, and Frye played together. Why the heck not try that again? With the way Nash shoots (almost always), and Goran and Frye the last two games, we needed defenders to to add in the mix. Frye actually plays better defense, when he has stronger defenders around him. Jrich would not be the answer in any of those situations. So why all the clutch minutes and at the three spot? :dontknow:

Return to Phoenix Suns