^
I understand paying the stars because they draw the tickets, and sell the jerseys but the 8-12 man on the bench do none of that. They could be important to a team, but making over a mil and hardly contributing is the issue I have with players salaries.
Do you favor a hard cap?
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Re: Do you favor a hard cap?
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,787
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Do you favor a hard cap?
- impulsenine
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 10, 2007
- Location: Tucson
- Contact:
Re: Do you favor a hard cap?
ginobiliflops wrote:you're saying that someone that takes 10 years of school at a university level doing public service work such as a doctor should make less than a Taylor Griffin? PPPPPPPPPLEASE
Good luck overturning the rules of supply and demand with outrage.
The hard cap would mean fewer BS trades and rosters like LA's, therefore I am for it.
Re: Do you favor a hard cap?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,927
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 25, 2007
Re: Do you favor a hard cap?
the_warden wrote:Mr. Sun wrote:First, basketball is a far more widespread phenomenon than it
was back then. It seems fitting that people should be paid accordingly.
If you say so!






