ImageImageImage

Game 59: La Clippers(24-33) @ Phoenix(36-23)

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

Sandra
Sophomore
Posts: 181
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2008

Re: Game 59: La Clippers(24-33) @ Phoenix(36-23) 

Post#121 » by Sandra » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:05 am

Qwigglez wrote:
rsavaj wrote:Nash didn't look too great tonight. I really wish we had sat him out of tonight's game and the Philly game, because it seems like his back/abdomen are still bothering him.


Crap. That is scary since we are playing the Spurs and Nash has a tendency to get exposed by Parker.

Even my grandma knows that none can guard Nash. As for Parker on the opposite end, who cares? Stopping the likes of Parker, Barbs, Monta Ellis, etc, has always been the duty of big men, no?
Sandra
Sophomore
Posts: 181
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2008

Re: Game 59: La Clippers(24-33) @ Phoenix(36-23) 

Post#122 » by Sandra » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:11 am

KopLegend wrote:
SteveNashMVP wrote:
Biff wrote:I proposed a trade awhile back during the whole Amare debacle and it was Amare and RoLo for BroLo and expirings. Some asshat called me out and said I was delusional. I'm thinking he's right, but for the opposite reason, the Suns would be getting screwed!

I think its safe to say that Robin is better than Brooke

No. I'd trade Robin for Brook any day.

I wouldn't. Brook can only be good on a slow team, IMO. He undoubtedly is more talented than Robin, but isn't a good fit for teams that play uptempo bball
Terry Porter would choose Brook over Robin, though, of that I'm sure
Sandra
Sophomore
Posts: 181
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2008

Re: Game 59: La Clippers(24-33) @ Phoenix(36-23) 

Post#123 » by Sandra » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:37 am

Furthermore, Brook is the main offensive weapon for the Nets. As the 5th man? I highly doubt that he would be as useful for the Suns as RoLo is
I did think that drafting RoLo was one of Kerr's numerous blunders. Now, I've changed my mind

Return to Phoenix Suns