one thing i dont understand

justin1093 · Post #1 » by **justin1093** » Sat Jul 3, 2010 5:10 am

i was looking at the game logs for the playoffs and channing frye had more rebounds off the bench then amare did 90-87. its only 3 more but still

DirtyDez · Post #2 » by **DirtyDez** » Sat Jul 3, 2010 5:25 am

Frye played like sh*t offensively but i give him props for picking up the boards that series. I think he had 10+ in 2 of the games.

justin1093 · Post #3 » by **justin1093** » Sat Jul 3, 2010 5:28 am

and thats just in the series,amare had like 3 of those the whole playoffs

Post #4 » by **KJ7** » Sat Jul 3, 2010 2:11 pm

A lot of it had to do with Frye playing C in our defensive zone. It's a lot harder for forwards to rebound in a zone cos they have to guard all the way out to the pockets so they're not around the basket as often.

phx#7 · Post #5 » by **phx#7** » Sat Jul 3, 2010 2:39 pm

KJ7 wrote:A lot of it had to do with Frye playing C in our defensive zone. It's a lot harder for forwards to rebound in a zone cos they have to guard all the way out to the pockets so they're not around the basket as often.

Exactly. While Amare isn't a great rebounder he is average, and average is much better than Frye.

The one thing I can't understand is how a guy that shoots 30% in the biggest series of his life when shooting is all he can do gets 6mil per.

DRK · Post #6 » by **DRK** » Sat Jul 3, 2010 2:43 pm

phx#7 wrote:
KJ7 wrote:A lot of it had to do with Frye playing C in our defensive zone. It's a lot harder for forwards to rebound in a zone cos they have to guard all the way out to the pockets so they're not around the basket as often.

The one thing I can't understand is how a guy that shoots 30% in the biggest series of his life when shooting is all he can do gets 6mil per.