Jesus Christ....humanity really depresses the frack out of me sometimes.
My thoughts are with them

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
impulsenine wrote:The worst part is that he thinks he did it for Christianity (and against Islam), without realizing he is no more a Christian than bin Laden was a Muslim.
Sad, and disgusting.
ginobiliflops wrote:impulsenine wrote:The worst part is that he thinks he did it for Christianity (and against Islam), without realizing he is no more a Christian than bin Laden was a Muslim.
Sad, and disgusting.
He certainly is not a Christian. It's completely against the religion. Thou Shall Not Murder. His agenda could be to swing people away from being Christians by shedding them in a bad light.
ginobiliflops wrote:impulsenine wrote:The worst part is that he thinks he did it for Christianity (and against Islam), without realizing he is no more a Christian than bin Laden was a Muslim.
Sad, and disgusting.
He certainly is not a Christian. It's completely against the religion. Thou Shall Not Murder. His agenda could be to swing people away from being Christians by shedding them in a bad light.
rsavaj wrote:That agenda does not seem probable to me.
And there's a lot of people doing this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
Steven Weinberg wrote:With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil—that takes religion.
ginobiliflops wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/26/bill-oreilly-media-breivik-christian_n_909498.html
BurningHeart wrote:Unbelievable. I can't believe there wasn't ONE guy who could have stopped this "person". NINETY TWO
people. WHAT.
Straight up unfathomable.
lilfishi22 wrote:I read the maximum sentence per terrorism charge is 21 years in Norway. He's charged on two counts of terrorism so that's 42 years. To think, if he lived long enough, that he would walk out of prison seems unjust.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win