Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
-
SunsRback4Good
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,418
- And1: 12,364
- Joined: May 13, 2011
-
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
If Nash somehow ends up in Miami will most of you root for them then you do now?
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
-
JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
I'll root for Nash wherever he is. even Miami. I like battier to, so I can hold my nose
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
-
SILERtheDEFILER
- Junior
- Posts: 260
- And1: 18
- Joined: Dec 31, 2011
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
miami is by far my least favorite team but that doesnt matter. nash needs a ring, so ill root for them. and as a bonus it will take away quite a bit from lebron if he finally gets a championship and needed wade, bosh, and nash to get it...
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
-
amares goggles
- Sophomore
- Posts: 136
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 28, 2009
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
everyone is talking about turning to "elite" form in a year. it is going to be along time before we're in that discussion
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
-
RunDogGun
- No Sham, More Cam
- Posts: 17,891
- And1: 5,437
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Beyond the Sun
Re: Game 65: Phoenix Suns(33-31)@Utah Jazz(34-30)
amares goggles wrote:everyone is talking about turning to "elite" form in a year. it is going to be along time before we're in that discussion
I don't think anyone is saying that. The only reason I threw out that word, is because that is what our FO has said is our goal, not rebuilding for years.