Chi town wrote:Bulls would send Niko and Sac pick for Knight.
Btw. Love booker. Think he's the next Klay.
I don't think your GM would.
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Chi town wrote:Bulls would send Niko and Sac pick for Knight.
Btw. Love booker. Think he's the next Klay.
SF88 wrote:Chi town wrote:Bulls would send Niko and Sac pick for Knight.
Btw. Love booker. Think he's the next Klay.
I don't think your GM would.
Chi town wrote:SF88 wrote:Chi town wrote:Bulls would send Niko and Sac pick for Knight.
Btw. Love booker. Think he's the next Klay.
I don't think your GM would.
Bulls are at a crossroads and need to reload. Rose sucks, Gasol is horribly inefficient and ball stopper of Hoiball, and Jimmy is trying to self promote himself to leader of the team but the vets aren't buying it. In essence we need a Rose replacement.
If we continue to play avg and not elite then the Bulls will make a small trade at the deadline like Gibson for Darren Collison. This frees up mins for Portis and Niko. They will get hem burn to up their value. In FA Bulls will go hard after Harrison Barnes as their SF Stretch PF. Him playing the 4 allows us to shop Niko for a PG. IMO Ros will be traded for an expiring this deadline (Joe Johnson although unlikely) or waived and stretched this summer. They did it to Boozer.
Niko has been high and low. Problem is he doesn't get shots. Rose Butler Gasol take all the shots. He is now coming off the bench to get more shots and get into a rhythm. He's been out of sync but has shown moments of rookie year highlights. I think he is a 18 and 8 big the can stretch the floor and take over games when he gets hot.
I think your board is too down on Knight. I think he has gotten better but can't coexist w Bledsoe and he's too expensive as a 6th man.
SF88 wrote:Chi town wrote:SF88 wrote:I don't think your GM would.
Bulls are at a crossroads and need to reload. Rose sucks, Gasol is horribly inefficient and ball stopper of Hoiball, and Jimmy is trying to self promote himself to leader of the team but the vets aren't buying it. In essence we need a Rose replacement.
If we continue to play avg and not elite then the Bulls will make a small trade at the deadline like Gibson for Darren Collison. This frees up mins for Portis and Niko. They will get hem burn to up their value. In FA Bulls will go hard after Harrison Barnes as their SF Stretch PF. Him playing the 4 allows us to shop Niko for a PG. IMO Ros will be traded for an expiring this deadline (Joe Johnson although unlikely) or waived and stretched this summer. They did it to Boozer.
Niko has been high and low. Problem is he doesn't get shots. Rose Butler Gasol take all the shots. He is now coming off the bench to get more shots and get into a rhythm. He's been out of sync but has shown moments of rookie year highlights. I think he is a 18 and 8 big the can stretch the floor and take over games when he gets hot.
I think your board is too down on Knight. I think he has gotten better but can't coexist w Bledsoe and he's too expensive as a 6th man.
With Bulls apparently looking for a new wing and all, I think this is a trade that works for both sides
Knight, Kieff, Tucker for Gibson, Mirotic, McDermott, Moore and the SAC 1st rd pick.
bwgood77 wrote:SF88 wrote:Chi town wrote:
Bulls are at a crossroads and need to reload. Rose sucks, Gasol is horribly inefficient and ball stopper of Hoiball, and Jimmy is trying to self promote himself to leader of the team but the vets aren't buying it. In essence we need a Rose replacement.
If we continue to play avg and not elite then the Bulls will make a small trade at the deadline like Gibson for Darren Collison. This frees up mins for Portis and Niko. They will get hem burn to up their value. In FA Bulls will go hard after Harrison Barnes as their SF Stretch PF. Him playing the 4 allows us to shop Niko for a PG. IMO Ros will be traded for an expiring this deadline (Joe Johnson although unlikely) or waived and stretched this summer. They did it to Boozer.
Niko has been high and low. Problem is he doesn't get shots. Rose Butler Gasol take all the shots. He is now coming off the bench to get more shots and get into a rhythm. He's been out of sync but has shown moments of rookie year highlights. I think he is a 18 and 8 big the can stretch the floor and take over games when he gets hot.
I think your board is too down on Knight. I think he has gotten better but can't coexist w Bledsoe and he's too expensive as a 6th man.
With Bulls apparently looking for a new wing and all, I think this is a trade that works for both sides
Knight, Kieff, Tucker for Gibson, Mirotic, McDermott, Moore and the SAC 1st rd pick.
That's pretty interesting. You should try that on the trade board. I'd probably leave out the pick because it is too much. But Mirotic is really not playing well AT ALL as Athe415 pointed out....whether or not he can ever improve on shooting I am not sure about. McDermott might be the most interesting piece we'd get. I don't really want to start Taj, but off the bench maybe, though I'd rather get a better PF than that, because I'd still rather start Leuer than him.
bwgood77 wrote:SF88 wrote:Chi town wrote:
Bulls are at a crossroads and need to reload. Rose sucks, Gasol is horribly inefficient and ball stopper of Hoiball, and Jimmy is trying to self promote himself to leader of the team but the vets aren't buying it. In essence we need a Rose replacement.
If we continue to play avg and not elite then the Bulls will make a small trade at the deadline like Gibson for Darren Collison. This frees up mins for Portis and Niko. They will get hem burn to up their value. In FA Bulls will go hard after Harrison Barnes as their SF Stretch PF. Him playing the 4 allows us to shop Niko for a PG. IMO Ros will be traded for an expiring this deadline (Joe Johnson although unlikely) or waived and stretched this summer. They did it to Boozer.
Niko has been high and low. Problem is he doesn't get shots. Rose Butler Gasol take all the shots. He is now coming off the bench to get more shots and get into a rhythm. He's been out of sync but has shown moments of rookie year highlights. I think he is a 18 and 8 big the can stretch the floor and take over games when he gets hot.
I think your board is too down on Knight. I think he has gotten better but can't coexist w Bledsoe and he's too expensive as a 6th man.
With Bulls apparently looking for a new wing and all, I think this is a trade that works for both sides
Knight, Kieff, Tucker for Gibson, Mirotic, McDermott, Moore and the SAC 1st rd pick.
That's pretty interesting. You should try that on the trade board. I'd probably leave out the pick because it is too much. But Mirotic is really not playing well AT ALL as Athe415 pointed out....whether or not he can ever improve on shooting I am not sure about. McDermott might be the most interesting piece we'd get. I don't really want to start Taj, but off the bench maybe, though I'd rather get a better PF than that, because I'd still rather start Leuer than him.
saintEscaton wrote:What a pathetic showing. His body language suggests that he could care less about the direction of the team. He's not the kind of role model that will lead by example for the youngins to take after. But we need ship Queef outta town first. If a decent offer presents itself for Bled I would pull the trigger in a heartbeat. Gotta gauge the market and be patient and strike while the iron is hot before he drives down his value too much
GoranTragic wrote:saintEscaton wrote:What a pathetic showing. His body language suggests that he could care less about the direction of the team. He's not the kind of role model that will lead by example for the youngins to take after. But we need ship Queef outta town first. If a decent offer presents itself for Bled I would pull the trigger in a heartbeat. Gotta gauge the market and be patient and strike while the iron is hot before he drives down his value too much
He started the season as the leader and then obviously something happened. Maybe Sarver is taking control? Who knows with this franchise.
AtheJ415 wrote:GoranTragic wrote:saintEscaton wrote:What a pathetic showing. His body language suggests that he could care less about the direction of the team. He's not the kind of role model that will lead by example for the youngins to take after. But we need ship Queef outta town first. If a decent offer presents itself for Bled I would pull the trigger in a heartbeat. Gotta gauge the market and be patient and strike while the iron is hot before he drives down his value too much
He started the season as the leader and then obviously something happened. Maybe Sarver is taking control? Who knows with this franchise.
He's not motivated. Fairly obvious to me. Reminds me of work scenarios where I get placed with people I either can't work with or cannot respect. It becomes literally difficult to work/play as hard as when you are in a good situation. This is a cultural issue. I see it with a lot of our players, including vets who have never been that way before (Tyson Chandler). I think everything would be different if we didn't have so little success. Players expected more than what has happened this year, and they're clearly disappointed.
I think people need to reset their expectations. Eric Bledsoe is not a #1 guy. He never has been. Putting the responsibility of leading this team on him is unreasonable when he has never pretended to be a leader. What he is is an elite #2. He shouldn't be looked at as some failure just because we, like all but 5 or 6 teams in the league, don't have a #1. We are rebuilding by accumulating talent so that we could sell the supporting cast as ideal to a #1 in FA. Bledsoe is a useful piece who is well worth his salary even if he never becomes a leader.
bwgood77 wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:GoranTragic wrote:
He started the season as the leader and then obviously something happened. Maybe Sarver is taking control? Who knows with this franchise.
He's not motivated. Fairly obvious to me. Reminds me of work scenarios where I get placed with people I either can't work with or cannot respect. It becomes literally difficult to work/play as hard as when you are in a good situation. This is a cultural issue. I see it with a lot of our players, including vets who have never been that way before (Tyson Chandler). I think everything would be different if we didn't have so little success. Players expected more than what has happened this year, and they're clearly disappointed.
I think people need to reset their expectations. Eric Bledsoe is not a #1 guy. He never has been. Putting the responsibility of leading this team on him is unreasonable when he has never pretended to be a leader. What he is is an elite #2. He shouldn't be looked at as some failure just because we, like all but 5 or 6 teams in the league, don't have a #1. We are rebuilding by accumulating talent so that we could sell the supporting cast as ideal to a #1 in FA. Bledsoe is a useful piece who is well worth his salary even if he never becomes a leader.
Chandler becomes disinterested often. He certainly was with the Knicks.
AtheJ415 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:
He's not motivated. Fairly obvious to me. Reminds me of work scenarios where I get placed with people I either can't work with or cannot respect. It becomes literally difficult to work/play as hard as when you are in a good situation. This is a cultural issue. I see it with a lot of our players, including vets who have never been that way before (Tyson Chandler). I think everything would be different if we didn't have so little success. Players expected more than what has happened this year, and they're clearly disappointed.
I think people need to reset their expectations. Eric Bledsoe is not a #1 guy. He never has been. Putting the responsibility of leading this team on him is unreasonable when he has never pretended to be a leader. What he is is an elite #2. He shouldn't be looked at as some failure just because we, like all but 5 or 6 teams in the league, don't have a #1. We are rebuilding by accumulating talent so that we could sell the supporting cast as ideal to a #1 in FA. Bledsoe is a useful piece who is well worth his salary even if he never becomes a leader.
Chandler becomes disinterested often. He certainly was with the Knicks.
Yeah, but that's kind of the point. The Knicks culture at that time sucked. He was traded to Dal and suddenly was like he's been for most of his career.
bwgood77 wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Chandler becomes disinterested often. He certainly was with the Knicks.
Yeah, but that's kind of the point. The Knicks culture at that time sucked. He was traded to Dal and suddenly was like he's been for most of his career.
So lets say Knight doesn't turn it over when we had the lead or a tie game with seemingly the last possession and beat Detroit and Memphis, and then Bledsoe doesn't turn it over on the last couple of possessions against Milwaukee, and we win that (probably could have won at least three more too) but just those three, going 4-2 on road trip beating Chicago, Memphis, Detroit and Toronto (all playoff caliber teams), and are 15-16 and sitting in the 8th seed, do you think Chandler gives up then?
I think Chandler gives up when the guards don't get him involved. He even came out and said they need to get the centers involved, and after that they immediately got Len involved for like one game. But after that they regressed and got back to their old ways. I think they just get back to their career tendencies, which is likely why Knight has been traded twice and possibly why Bledsoe was traded. Because they don't listen and/or have low bbiq. My hope is that they are just young and snap out of it because our best bet is hanging onto them and them improving with age, but I just don't think it is necessarily just because of the current coaching staff.
The other vets respond well to the coaches (P.J. and Price given their respective talent), and Dragic, Frye and countless others have as well.
I just think it is more a result of roster make up.