Frank Lee wrote:With you Fo
No trades unless it makes us better for certain. Cant continue to rely on speculation. We wont find a better PG this year, and really, after sitting Bled for a month, he deserves a chance to run the show. Besides, he is our dance ticket for when Boogie Fever hits the league. Long shot I know, but there are not but a few players DMC said he wants to play with.
Interesting article/rumor on the Cavs holding out for a young star and hoping for Zinger. Any doubts they are preparing for a James-less future ? Chris could be considered that star as he certainly is by us. But I think McD says nuts to trading for a player who isn't enrolling long term in Watson's Daycare Center. Especially when the price is Bled plus plus.. Too much to lose for a risky gain. We need to stop the trend of replacing legit talent for projected or temporary talent. The core is set for the next 3-4 years..... Book, Jackson, Warren, Bender, Chris, Ulis, Williams. I can live with that .... at least for this year.
So that makes:
'13-'14
'14-'15
'15-'16
'16-'17
'17-'18
To me, '17-'18 should've been the season that McD took us to the playoffs. Remember our debates from a few years back, Frank? I was adamant that McD deserved the time, a couple more years to turn this team around; collect his 'assets' to bring in that star player? Well, per my time table (the only one that matters
), McD needs to produce a winning team THIS year. We have an opportunity to start that trend by getting Kyrie in here. You want DMC? Our best chance is to have another star waiting for him as well. Kyrie is just not a 'temporary' talent; his 'draw' would be as a star, as well, that may bring in other 'stars'. Bledsoe's contract is up in two years as well. Why is that any different?
Losing Chriss would be a bummer, but the point was never to build an entire team from scratch; the point was to collect assets to trade for BIGGER assets, and now we have an opportunity. I'm usually not one for 'losing out' on trades, but in this scenario? I'd be ok, because it serves a purpose.
Cedi Osman's trade restriction, BTW, ends today...maybe that's what we are waiting on??
Bledsoe, Chriss, Our 2018 1st-Top 5 protected
for...
Irving, Osman
We get a young potential back, they get Chriss, and rising star, plus Bledsoe.
So now, with Irving, we have a no-kidding star. Whether he's an upgrade to Bledsoe is irrelevant. He's younger, fits our timeline better, and attract more 'all star' talent.
We still have Booker, Warren, Bender, Jackson, and now we have Kyrie. Booker, Warren progress, Kyrie is Kyrie, and the 'wildcards' are Bender and Jackson. If they come in 'hot', we're a playoff team.
I know many of you want to discount us, some because 'Vegas says so', some just because it's par for the course. Yet out of the other sides of your mouths, you talk about Warren and Booker as being top talents in the league, Jackson coming in and taking the league by storm, Bledsoe being 'as good as Kyrie', and Bender being the next great multi-purpose big. If that is all the case, why can't we compete with some of the lower end seeds?
Anyway, Frank, I think we should take the opportunity that is present, that does not present itself often. A 'star' is available for trade, and we have the pieces to make it work. In my mind, we take that opportunity and quit running, as you call it, a 'day care center'.