thamadkant wrote:I don't like super max contracts. Players should be capped at 30M tops and the rest of their income should be from merchandise and advertising using their star power.
I certainly don't think Booker is on the same level as Giannis, Jokic and Luka.
I cringe when I think a player like Zach Lavine asking for $200 Million contract. Makes me think rookie MJ was worth $250M and prime MJ at $700M based on impact and talent. In fact MJ could probably justify $200M a year if you include his merchandising and star power.
Seems like there is no set criteria.
Teams will pay their face of the franchise players and if that player can lead them to the playoffs during the life of the extension, not whether they can necessarily lead them to rings.
That is why Wall got his money. Even without his injury, the Wizards were never title contenders but they could make some noise in the playoffs every other year or so.
What happens if Suns let Ayton walk, get little or nothing back? They have 4 seasons invested in him plus the years of losing that led to the top pick.
Suns were title favorites to many entering the playoffs. Ayton, along with the rest of the current roster, may not be good enough to win a title but if they lose him, what happens to their prospects? Can they win 60 games again without him? Can they reach the WCF or the Finals?
It might take a couple of years to replace his production or restructure the team, maybe they are able to acquire another scorer.
Whether Booker is good enough as the #1 player on a title team, I would guess the Suns give him the extension. But depending on what happens to the rest of the team, he may more be like Lillard, the best player on a team which makes the playoffs most years but doesn't get beyond the second round too often.