2021 Playoff and Offseason Speculation - the playoffs. PLAYOFFS????

TouchPassDario · Post #1061 » by **TouchPassDario** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:03 am

Read on Twitter

Mitchell was 12-34 lmaooooo Jazz homers WOAT

TouchPassDario · Post #1062 » by **TouchPassDario** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:05 am

They also think the game was “rigged” against them.

Hint: they’re wrong!

Read on Twitter

TouchPassDario · Post #1063 » by **TouchPassDario** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:08 am

Noted dumbass weighs in

Read on Twitter

Mulhollanddrive · Post #1064 » by **Mulhollanddrive** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:08 am

Think Paul will take his player option $44m and then test the market.

If he has a good season he'll probably get his $23m per for 2 years that'd be $90m over 3.

So the question is do we want him doing that on our team and on current form I think so.

TouchPassDario · Post #1065 » by **TouchPassDario** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:11 am

Lol backpedal more ****

Read on Twitter

TouchPassDario · Post #1066 » by **TouchPassDario** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:15 am

They hear footsteps.

Getting scared and mad.

Post #1067 » by **bwgood77** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:17 am

Slim Charless wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Slim Charless wrote:
He's getting what 40+ a year? I'm hoping that if he decides to keep going that he'll sign a 30 mill a yr deal. 3 years/90-100 million seems fair. Saves us a little and keeps him here for the rest of his career.

Nobody is paying him $30 million a year, especially on a 3 year deal starting at 37 years old. That just doesn't happen except for LeBron maybe.

3 years, 50-60 million works even better

I think he picks up his option at $45 million (I would), and then IF he is still playing at a high level and both sides want to continue, we would possibly do something like 2/$35.

Now I guess that's not THAT far off from 3/$90 if he wasn't to pick up option, because it's essentially 3/$80 all combined. I think that is pretty high end though at that age.

Mulhollanddrive · Post #1068 » by **Mulhollanddrive** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:19 am

Sac are so bad down 7 to Lakers b-team.

Slim Charless · Post #1069 » by **Slim Charless** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:30 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Sac are so bad down 7 to Lakers b-team.

Windhorst said that some star player is gonna demand a trade to NYC soon. My personal prediction is Fox. He's gotta be sick of losing, SAC already drafted Haliburton and the Knicks need a PG. He's not a superstar player, but playing for the Knicks, he'd be an all star for sure this season.

Mulhollanddrive · Post #1070 » by **Mulhollanddrive** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:31 am

Were down 14 but making some sort of comeback, maybe they can have a good bench stretch.

Barkley6 · Post #1071 » by **Barkley6** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:39 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Sac are so bad down 7 to Lakers b-team.

Sacramento is such a weird team. On paper they look pretty decent, Fox, Hield, Holmes, Bagley and Barnes are all solid NBA starters. And Halliburton, Bjelica and Whiteside give them a pretty decent 8 man rotation. How are they so bad? Is it coaching? Bad fit?

Barkley6 · Post #1072 » by **Barkley6** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:42 am

Barkley6 wrote:
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Sac are so bad down 7 to Lakers b-team.

Sacramento is such a weird team. On paper they look pretty decent, Fox, Hield, Holmes, Bagley and Barnes are all solid NBA starters. And Halliburton, Bjelica and Whiteside give them a pretty decent 8 man rotation. How are they so bad? Is it coaching? Bad fit?

On that note...I think Holmes would be a great offseason add for the Suns. Don't know how he'd feel about being a bench player after starting in Sac, but I'd love to see the Suns make a run at him.

Barkley6 · Post #1073 » by **Barkley6** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 3:49 am

Dont look now....but Ty Jerome has just put together 3 pretty solid games for OKC.

Post #1074 » by **bwgood77** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 4:09 am

Slim Charless wrote:
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Sac are so bad down 7 to Lakers b-team.

Windhorst said that some star player is gonna demand a trade to NYC soon. My personal prediction is Fox. He's gotta be sick of losing, SAC already drafted Haliburton and the Knicks need a PG. He's not a superstar player, but playing for the Knicks, he'd be an all star for sure this season.

He just signed a max extension. Starts next year. FA in 2026. Wouldn't be that nice of a move to demand for a trade.

Post #1075 » by **bwgood77** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 4:09 am

Barkley6 wrote:Dont look now....but Ty Jerome has just put together 3 pretty solid games for OKC.

I'm actually going to look right now.

cberry78 · Post #1076 » by **cberry78** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 5:18 am

Barkley6 wrote:Dont look now....but Ty Jerome has just put together 3 pretty solid games for OKC.

That dude would be so good to play next Point Book! Too bad he's not paid like $15m!

TouchPassDario · Post #1077 » by **TouchPassDario** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 5:37 am

Thank you, Kings!

TouchPassDario · Post #1078 » by **TouchPassDario** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 5:38 am

Slim Charless wrote:
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Sac are so bad down 7 to Lakers b-team.

Windhorst said that some star player is gonna demand a trade to NYC soon. My personal prediction is Fox. He's gotta be sick of losing, SAC already drafted Haliburton and the Knicks need a PG. He's not a superstar player, but playing for the Knicks, he'd be an all star for sure this season.

Westbrook or Towns imo.

Flying Colors · Post #1079 » by **Flying Colors** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:06 am

Lakers lose again, giving us a little breathing room in the seeding

AtheJ415 · Post #1080 » by **AtheJ415** » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:53 am

TouchPassDario wrote:
Slim Charless wrote:
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Sac are so bad down 7 to Lakers b-team.

Windhorst said that some star player is gonna demand a trade to NYC soon. My personal prediction is Fox. He's gotta be sick of losing, SAC already drafted Haliburton and the Knicks need a PG. He's not a superstar player, but playing for the Knicks, he'd be an all star for sure this season.

Westbrook or Towns imo.

I think if Towns demands a trade, NYC is not one of the teams on the list. I would actually guess we might be his most preferred.

I could see Beal demanding a trade soon. Westbrook would be much harder to move than Beal anyways.

Will we extend Bridges or will Sarver not pay 4 players big money for 1 or 2 years?