tgtm_24 wrote:When Max contracts are signed no one ever thinks said player is worthy of it. I'd offer Dragic the max if he produced this season. Build a culture of looking after our own. That will make Phoenix a popular destination.
Not true, ever ask anyone if Lebron was worth his contract? Durant? Even Love? There is a problem in the league with guys capping out. When a team can have Lebron at the same price as Gordon Hayward (basically) there is an issue. This comes from over-regulation of salaries. If you have to regulate (debatable), I think to make this right, the league should set a standard amount of $$ that any franchise can spend altogether (Operations, Marketing, player salaries- everything) and see what teams can do within that context. Maybe something like $100 mil. All of this other business with capping out would really be diminished because you could pay Lebron the $70mil he is worth, and Hayward would still be at $15. Teams would have to constrain their other spending though, based on the marquee player they want. Cap space would mean significantly more, teams would have to look at their internal costs, and couldn't rely on external deals (tv, League-money) to use as operating capital for the team. From there bonuses should be based on the wins the team generates, with extra significant shares for playoff wins and conference championships- currently pay for performance is way too limited in this league, and that's why there are so many yoke contracts and players considered busts. Tanking would also go out the window. The better your team does, even if they don't make the playoffs, the better players, coaches, staff and everybody will do financially. Players could hold shares and be part owners in the league they are a part of, and get a dividend from those shares of league profits above and beyond their regular pay. The league does better, their dividend goes up, everybody wins. It seems it would be a better alignment of interests, vs. owner/ player relationship currently. This would also help minimize the big-market vs small market issue somewhat except for endorsement deals. This would also provide better long-term prospects for players after their playing careers are done. Dividends means payouts in perpetuity so long as the shares are held and not sold.