AZWildByNature wrote:DarkHawk wrote:ray ray wrote:Update:
The Suns would've traded Bledsoe, Jackson and Miami's first round IF Kyrie Irving would've committed to an extension. However, Kyrie isn't committed to anyone at this moment.
Having said this, the Suns WILL NOT offer Jackson for Irving under any circumstances. That's part of the issue as to why every team is low balling for Irving.
* and by agreing to an extension, they mean giving his word which he isn't.
That makes me sick to read.
I'm a little confused. Are you saying we would have before the draft, had he committed? But now that we have Jackson, we won't?
Seeing as 'any circumstance' would technically include if he committed.
I think if Jackson would have been picked by the Celtics, the Draft Day trade would have been done. But since it didn't and the Cavs FO was in flux, they still think that they (LBJ) can get Bledsoe and Jackson for Kyrie. Since Kyrie's trade request has been made public, the Suns have leverage to lowball the Cavs. I doubt that even if Kyrie gives the Suns a verbal promise to commit longterm, they would still trade Jackson to get him.
This is what I have concluded, as well. I said before the draft that I would understand if we decided to trade the pick. I think they got lucky with Jackson. I think Jackson will be better than Kyrie. Accordingly, I don't think it matters very much anymore whether we trade for Kyrie. ... Which is a great position to be in, considering our leverage. Kyrie could go wherever. Happy to trade Bledsoe for reasonable value.
If the Cavs can get Beverley and Jordan for Kyrie, I prefer this trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=yckom7km . I would try to move Thompson to a third team and attempt to extract a draft pick from someone. I would take a protected pick from each team, if it's on offer.