jredsaz wrote:bwgood77 wrote:DarkHawk wrote:My head really hurts reading some of these posts.
Knight has negative value. People must stop putting him in any trade idea that doesn't include us giving up a valuable asset (Miami's pick next year isn't going to get it done)
We should NOT be trying to trade for Love anymore (or ever).
Getting Irving, while it'd be fun, would lead to some horrendous defense.
We need to use 17/18 to:
1. Develop our youth
2. Get another year off knights contract and perhaps build his value a bit
3. Scour the market for trades that favor us
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
Bravo, if people are paying attention to what it is taking to dump lesser contracts, I don't even think the Miami pick is enough to dump Knight. If Gambo is right that he won't play any more I'm not sure what the solution might be. I don't know if Sarver wants a buy out unless he finds a decent contract elsewhere and just takes less money than the difference, but that still impacts Sarver's pocket book if we use the cap space saved on other players. I'm not a fan of stretching him.
The cost isn't going to be a pick. It's going to be swapping bad contracts.
Crabbe, Kanter, Turner, Bazemore, etc.
Portland is significantly over the tax so they may actually be willing to send something of value along with salary in exchange for Knight. But it won't be anything good.
Sent from my SM-N920V using RealGM mobile app
Since those are all much better players, they would have to be far worse contracts, or we'd have to throw in a sweetener. I don't think Portland cares about the tax. Their owner is worth over $21 billion.
With the revenue these guys make just from the NBA (remember, their split is larger than what they players are getting), they probably still come out ahead anyway.
The Asik contract makes the most sense. Portland has plenty of guards, and Presti wouldn't want Knight. He is owed less overall and could opt out over this year.