SSOL wrote:What do tattoos have to do with anything? How do you know the alleged "victim" was a "regular Joe?" There are plenty of large people with ink that are not professional athletes.
Um is not an answer. If this is an intimidation situation, its hard to hide the elephant in the court room. These are two big guys, with tattoos, behaving aggressively. I know nothing about the alleged victim, but if there is a distinct physical disadvantage, coupled with a solid beat down, instigated by our boys...it does not present itself well. Toss in intimidating a witness? In todays Bully-sensitive world, you just can't ignore these things. And other than implied organizational behavior, their profession only intensifies public interest, but has no bearing. well, yes it does if you take into account the legal mind of Babby. And yes, tattoos still carry a stigma, especially in the criminal arena.
I think the FO will swing (has swung) full into damage control. I would bet they have been privy of this info a couple of days ago when it was circulating subversively. Good chance this will all be settled out of court, with minimal details released, with a non disclosure agreement. It is important the FO to show support.Protect your assets. But the truth must be shared internally. Punishment will be compensatory damages plus punitive to the victim. The Bros will be suspended w/o pay, don't know if the league can fine them too. Surely anger management classes will surface. Keep in mind, that is a scenario if the MoBros are deemed the culprits, and that is a good outcome if so. If it goes to trial ??? it could get fugly.
But... Babby is the ace in the hole. How many front offices have a dude that defended a GD presidential assassin ????
Lon is on this. Its hopefully less serious than imagined... I see the OrangeMan has chimed in with a story. Chasing someone down ??? Sheesh.
