Damkac wrote:NavLDO wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
I know you ignore the "positionless" basketball thing and the fact that you need 8 or so rotation players playing major minutes and who starts isn't always the most important....but...
The Celtics drafted SF Jaylen Brown #3.  The following year they drafted SF Jayson Tatum #3, signed SF Gordon Hayward to a max and traded for SF Marcus Morris who often starts.
They all seem to be progressing fairly well.  Hayward's injured, but given you wanted an example of two high lottery picks being drafted who play the same position there is one.
Funny thing is, in 2014 they took PG Marcus Smart #6 and then the next year they took PG Terry Rozier #16 and even traded for IT the same year.  They all played quite a bit.  They also had combo guard Avery Bradley in there.  They still had those two young rookie contract PGs when trading for all star Kyrie Irving.
That team worked out ok and all their players seem to develop fairly well.
Also, you mentioned something about Brooklyn being in a dilemma.  They want to start Dinwiddie and Russell together....I posted articles and links yesterday...they say Dinwiddie being 6'6 can guard any 2s...and Russell is great and sometimes better off ball.
So, I haven't even read any response yet, to my my response this morning to this post, because I also wanted to point out a couple of items as to why I have a problem with 2 x PFs and 2 x SFs, and it has to do with, well, we are not Boston.  We tried 3 combo Guards...or ...'positionless' Guards before, and it blew up in our face, and I've stated as much a couple of times. Warren has earned a starting spot. And while you and few other knowledgable Suns fans might be ok with JJ not starting, he likely won't, and it will have to do with his next contract. And the media won't and they'll consistently call him a bust for being a #4 overall pick and not a starter. He cannot 'fill the role' of a PG, and he's too small to be inside...I'm sorry, but there's 'positionless', and then there is insanity (no, I'm not calling you insane...I'm saying it waoul be insane to play him as a 'big'
I have NO aversion to 'positionless' basketball, and have mentioned on a few occasions that I've been open to Doncic coming in and fulfilling PG duties, or Booker playing the point, or whatever, so I do not thinks it's a fair comment to suggest that I 'ignore' positionless basketball, because I don't.
And when I was alluding to the Nets, I was ALSO including Lin in that conversation...that's 3 PGs that can start, and are better than any PG on our roster...or 'positionless' Combo Guard, or whatever you want to call a Guard that runs the point. I'm perfectly fine with Booker playing Combo Guard and us getting another one in here to play along side him. I've been an advocate of Warren playing the '4', and JJ playing the '2' when he can shoot.  I am extremely open to 'positionless' basketball. 
My point has ZERO to do with that, because we aren't DOING that.  It's Bender in for Chriss, or JJ in Warren.  When that changes...and I mean on a significant basis...not 2 minutes here and 2 minutes there...when that happens consistently, like 10-12 minutes a game, then tell me I'm being close minded. But right now, my comments are based off of how they are rotating them in and out and how they are playing them...nothing else.
Am I wrong?  Are Chriss and Bender getting significant playing time together at the 4 and 5 or 3 and 4?  Are Warren and JJ getting significant playing time playing together as the 2 and 3 or 3 and 4?  If so...like I said...like consistently, every game for 10-12 minutes, then I'll gladly admit I am wrong and change my tune.  Deal??
 
If they play enough minutes then why does it matter if they play together or not?
 
Because they aren't? 21MPG are not 'starter' level minutes...or, enough 'minutes' to develop like a starter, playing with other starters.  Those 'young' players that are becoming 'good'--look at how many minutes they are playing, and who they are primarily playing with.
Tatum - 31MPG
Markannen - 30MPG
Mitchell - 31.5
Ball is getting the minutes, but he just, well, is very good at some things, and very bad at others.
Then you have a couple of outliers in OG and Bam.
But our guys are trending around 21 MPG; JJ is up a little ONLY because Warren has been out a couple of games.
But even if they did get the minutes, we still don't have our 'franchise' PG, or Booker running the point with another capable SG, or whatever starting 5 we are going to run.
Basically, if our 'goal' is 'positionless' basketball, as BW is ridiculing me for not being able to comprehend, then the Suns would be playing 'positionless' basketball.  But oddly, they are not.  When we start:
Booker / JJ / Warren / Bender / Chriss
and they get, what, 28? 30? Minutes per game, and then I complain about them not getting enough minutes developing, etc., etc., then sure, go ahead and ridicule by saying "I know you like to ignore blah, blah, blah 'positionless' blah, blah..."
But that is NOT what is going on.  
Chriss plays, Chriss gets taken out. Bender gets put in, Bender gets taken out, Chriss gets put in, etc. etc.
Warren plays, Warren gets taken out. JJ gets put in, JJ gets taken out, Warren gets put in, etc., etc.
Exactly like that?  No, but pretty close, yeah? 
So, if I'm going to get lectured on 'positionless' basketball, when the Suns don't employ that strategy...at least as far as I have seen, well, that argument does not hold much water, IMO.