Brandon Clarke had huge questions about his shot. I loved him in the draft but i highly doubt Jones was going to ever take him. I literally selected "the best shooter in the draft". Jerome shot .392 from three during his career at UVA. I have no idea what was or was not on the table for Jones. I don't know what deals he was pushing for but I can guarantee you it involved adding shooting.AtheJ415 wrote:jredsaz wrote:I agree his moves were somewhat ham handed and he didn't manage value well but moving on from Warren and Jackson was inevitable. That boat sailed with the previous regime. The coaching turnover, lack of investment in development, lack of structure, tanking year after year lost Warren and Jackson. Still shocked Booker did what he did in that situation. His level of maturity mixed with work ethic is incredible.AtheJ415 wrote:
I'd still be mad about it. Truth is t would have been damn near impossible for this team to be as bad as last year. Simply adding vets and our young guy getting older accomplished that.
I'll credit Jones for signing Rubio though how he ages will determine if that ends up a plus or minus. Kaminsky has been terrible. Jerome has been terrible. We're still missing competent backup guards and have a weird mix of centers and guards. Zach Lowe said it best at the time--we'll win more next year, but that's not really the point of why people are mad about this. We could have been better set up to win in the long run than we are today if we managed Warren, Jackson, and that entire debacle correctly.
Kaminsky missed and so did Jerome. But Saric and Baynes were quality additions. Cam looks like a core piece who I would rather have than either Warren or Jackson. I don't think he is selected unless they move Warren at the draft and have decided on Jacksons future.
Jones set out to do three things. Change the culture, add shooting around Ayton and Booker, and give them a legit point guard. He accomplished all of those things and still has all his first round picks and cap flexibility moving forward. Perfect? No. But it was effective.
I don't agree that we would be set up better for the future had we kept Warren and Jackson. I think the culture ruined them for the franchise.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
My guess is if Johnson wasn't elected, the Suns take Brandon Clarke. I would MUCH rather have Warren and Clarke than Johnson and really any non-Booker, Ayton, or Mikal combo. Also, if the Grizzlies liked Jackson and Melton, which they presumably do, then why couldn't we have traded back in at 21 for Clarke, who was just 3 picks ahead of Jerome?
The best fit next to Ayton, Booker, and Bridges may very well end up being Cam even if Warren and Clarke have better careers.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app














