ImageImageImage

The One And Only Offseason Thread 3

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,601
And1: 14,877
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1221 » by Qwigglez » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:06 pm

Jdiddy701 wrote:Seriously he's like TJ Warren and JJ. Too calm and cool. He wants to play in Phoenix. I think he really likes his teammates and coach. It's obvious from last season.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Joe Johnson left Phoenix... :cry:
User avatar
aIvin adams
Analyst
Posts: 3,042
And1: 1,977
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1222 » by aIvin adams » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:16 pm

Qwigglez wrote:
Jdiddy701 wrote:Seriously he's like TJ Warren and JJ. Too calm and cool. He wants to play in Phoenix. I think he really likes his teammates and coach. It's obvious from last season.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Joe Johnson left Phoenix... :cry:


Bc he signed what used to be considered one of the worst contracts in basketball, until he signed his next max contract :D

Worst case scenario, we sign and trade Bledsoe for Boris Diaw (nba champion<---- !!!!)
User avatar
NapoleonII
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,680
And1: 5,060
Joined: Aug 31, 2007

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1223 » by NapoleonII » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:18 pm

From the main board.

desertlakerfan wrote:Bledsoe is not worth a max contract, no team will give him one.

If he truly thinks he's the kind of player that deserves a max deal, he should go the 2016 route. Sign the biggest 2 year deal you can get, then try again for a max deal when they are going to be worth much more due to the new TV deal. He'll still be young enough, and if he's as good as he thinks he is he'll have no problem getting a max deal at that point.
Ryu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,479
And1: 614
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1224 » by Ryu » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:33 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:Milwaukee sits by the phone while you guys sort this out. 8-)


Well, you can try to blow us away with an offer.

A little hint: that offer should include one of the two guys born in 1994. or younger.
User avatar
PhxSuns1
Ballboy
Posts: 45
And1: 26
Joined: Jul 12, 2014

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1225 » by PhxSuns1 » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:39 pm

Ryu wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:Milwaukee sits by the phone while you guys sort this out. 8-)


Well, you can try to blow us away with an offer.

A little hint: that offer should include one of the two guys born on 1994. or younger.


And English should preferably not be his first language.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,836
And1: 30,101
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1226 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:45 pm

Ryu wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:Milwaukee sits by the phone while you guys sort this out. 8-)


Well, you can try to blow us away with an offer.

A little hint: that offer should include one of the two guys born on 1994. or younger.


Doesn't work that way in RFA. The Suns either offer him the 4/$63 deal or they wait until someone offers it for them. And if the Suns have any concerns about paying him that much money or his potential attitude, then you mine the league for S&T offers.

My guess is that Jason Kidd has had a discussion with Bledsoe and Rich Paul and told them both that the 4/$63 payday awaits in Milwaukee but that the Bucks aren't going to shed the $2.5mm in payroll they need to extend a max offer that likely is matched, and that it is up to those two to figure out a S&T that works for the Suns. Suns meanwhile are content to sit for the moment.

I think the only thing that breaks the logjam is if the Suns propose a 5/$65 with an ETO after year three.

ETA: That deal works for Bledsoe because if he is injured, he still gets the $63(in this case $65) million he'd get with an offer sheet. But if he blows up and stays healthy, he can opt out after three years for a bigger payday under the new salary cap.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,291
And1: 6,424
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1227 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:52 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
Ryu wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:Milwaukee sits by the phone while you guys sort this out. 8-)


Well, you can try to blow us away with an offer.

A little hint: that offer should include one of the two guys born on 1994. or younger.


Doesn't work that way in RFA. The Suns either offer him the 4/$63 deal or they wait until someone offers it for them. And if the Suns have any concerns about paying him that much money or his potential attitude, then you mine the league for S&T offers.

My guess is that Jason Kidd has had a discussion with Bledsoe and Rich Paul and told them both that the 4/$63 payday awaits in Milwaukee but that the Bucks aren't going to shed the $2.5mm in payroll they need to extend a max offer that likely is matched, and that it is up to those two to figure out a S&T that works for the Suns. Suns meanwhile are content to sit for the moment.

I think the only thing that breaks the logjam is if the Suns propose a 5/$65 with an ETO after year three.


Hhhhhhhhonestly though, the Bucks aren't in this at all. Nothing they are willing to offer us is worth losing Bledsoe.
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,479
And1: 22,249
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1228 » by Revived » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:57 pm

We won't get any amazing deals in a sign and trade.

Tell me one time in which a player was signed and traded for something even close to the same value as being traded.
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1229 » by JDLAW » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:03 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
Ryu wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:Milwaukee sits by the phone while you guys sort this out. 8-)


Well, you can try to blow us away with an offer.

A little hint: that offer should include one of the two guys born on 1994. or younger.


Doesn't work that way in RFA. The Suns either offer him the 4/$63 deal or they wait until someone offers it for them. And if the Suns have any concerns about paying him that much money or his potential attitude, then you mine the league for S&T offers.

My guess is that Jason Kidd has had a discussion with Bledsoe and Rich Paul and told them both that the 4/$63 payday awaits in Milwaukee but that the Bucks aren't going to shed the $2.5mm in payroll they need to extend a max offer that likely is matched, and that it is up to those two to figure out a S&T that works for the Suns. Suns meanwhile are content to sit for the moment.

I think the only thing that breaks the logjam is if the Suns propose a 5/$65 with an ETO after year three.

ETA: That deal works for Bledsoe because if he is injured, he still gets the $63(in this case $65) million he'd get with an offer sheet. But if he blows up and stays healthy, he can opt out after three years for a bigger payday under the new salary cap.



Fantasyland! Suns have no obligation to Beldsoe, his agent or the Bucks to accept a mediocre sign and trade. Bucks have absolutely no leverage to force a sign and trade, even if they are able to come up with the $$ to make a max offer.

There is no logjam. This is a negotiation between Bledsoe's agent who does not have market leverage and the Suns. More fantasy on your part.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,836
And1: 30,101
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1230 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:04 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
Hhhhhhhhonestly though, the Bucks aren't in this at all. Nothing they are willing to offer us is worth losing Bledsoe.


Right. And that's why as Mark Stein said, you guys may sit in this situation for another month or more. During that time, Bledsoe is going to get resentful and the Suns fanbase will get resentful. I've seen this movie many times before as a Bucks fan when one of our young guys breaks out right before he becomes a free agent, but doesnt break out enough to justify the mega contract he wants.

I will eat the crow if Bledsoe cracks and takes 4/$48 but I don't think he does that. I think that 5/$65 ETO deal I noted above might get it done, but who knows if either side is willing to do that.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,291
And1: 6,424
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1231 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:04 pm

SF88 wrote:We won't get any amazing deals in a sign and trade.

Tell me one time in which a player was signed and traded for something even close to the same value as being traded.


Boris Diaw and a draft pick? :D
Frank Lee
RealGM
Posts: 14,268
And1: 10,086
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1232 » by Frank Lee » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:05 pm

If Bledsoe wasn't shopping himself around, he would've signed this deal rather quickly. Look at Lowry, He signed up with little delay. He wanted to play in Toronto, he wanted to be a raptor and now he is. He left little doubt with his fans.

If Bledsoe doesn't ink up by Monday, then it is plain as day that he doesn't care about being a Sun. He's all about the money. Clearly he was expecting many more options to choose from. Now he has painted himself into a corner and he really has to decide if this is where he wants to be for the next four years.

The longer he waits, the more clear it becomes.
What ? Me Worry ?
User avatar
PhxSuns1
Ballboy
Posts: 45
And1: 26
Joined: Jul 12, 2014

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1233 » by PhxSuns1 » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:09 pm

Its different when its a restricted free agent. Then you can get value just like a regular trade because were okay with keeping Bledsoe regardless. If a team really wants Bledsoe, they are going to have to give what they would in a normal trade because we could always just match. If he was unrestricted, yes. Then we just get **** scraps so we dont "lose him for nothing". Its different because we dont have to lose him at all if we dont want to.
Ryu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,479
And1: 614
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1234 » by Ryu » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:09 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
SF88 wrote:We won't get any amazing deals in a sign and trade.

Tell me one time in which a player was signed and traded for something even close to the same value as being traded.


Boris Diaw and a draft pick? :D


What a great deal that was, given the circumstances.

If we had a bit of luck in 2007. draft lottery we would have Diaw and Noah. Oh well.
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1235 » by JDLAW » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:13 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
Hhhhhhhhonestly though, the Bucks aren't in this at all. Nothing they are willing to offer us is worth losing Bledsoe.


Right. And that's why as Mark Stein said, you guys may sit in this situation for another month or more. During that time, Bledsoe is going to get resentful and the Suns fanbase will get resentful. I've seen this movie many times before as a Bucks fan when one of our young guys breaks out right before he becomes a free agent, but doesnt break out enough to justify the mega contract he wants.

I will eat the crow if Bledsoe cracks and takes 4/$48 but I don't think he does that. I think that 5/$65 ETO deal I noted above might get it done, but who knows if either side is willing to do that.



We're prepared to wait. If it goes on a month Bledose's incompetent agent will figure out there is nothing to give him leverage and he'll either take the deal on the table or negotiate some sort of compromise. A 5/65 deal is not much different than the 4/48 deal - a little higher base and an extra year. I suspect the compromise will add incentives for # of games and performance (all star, all pro).
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,836
And1: 30,101
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1236 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:24 pm

JDLAW wrote:. A 5/65 deal is not much different than the 4/48 deal - a little higher base and an extra year.


It is a big difference. $17 million worth.

It works for Bledsoe because if he blows out his knee again at any point the next three years, he's still getting at least the $63 million he would have gotten with an offer sheet this year. And if he blows up, he uses the early termination provision like LeBron has and opts out while collecting say at least $46 million in those first three years. He then can re-up for a bigger deal if he's worth it then.

For the Suns, they really only risk the same $63-$65 million they risk now via an offer sheet, should his knees go bad. If he blows up, you've still got him for three years and hold his Bird rights. And he would have been worth that 3/$46 you would have paid him to date.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,291
And1: 6,424
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1237 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:27 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
JDLAW wrote:. A 5/65 deal is not much different than the 4/48 deal - a little higher base and an extra year.


It is a big difference. $17 million worth.

It works for Bledsoe because if he blows out his knee again at any point the next three years, he's still getting at least the $63 million he would have gotten with an offer sheet this year. And if he blows up, he uses the early termination provision like LeBron has and opts out while collecting say at least $46 million in those first three years. He then can re-up for a bigger deal if he's worth it then.

For the Suns, they really only risk the same $63-$65 million they risk now via an offer sheet, should his knees go bad. If he blows up, you've still got him for three years and hold his Bird rights. And he would have been worth that 3/$46 you would have paid him to date.


I think if he wants the extra money, it's the Suns who should have the option, not the player. We're worried about risk, he's worried about $$$. Sounds like a deal. Oh, he's worried about $$$? Then how about $48m guaranteed? :lol:
NoKneeBledsoe
Junior
Posts: 324
And1: 92
Joined: Jul 13, 2014
     

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1238 » by NoKneeBledsoe » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:28 pm

If Bucks want to get down on this. Let's throw in 2 other teams.

Bucks Give : Brandon Knight, Illyasova, Sanders
Bucks get : Bledsoe S & T, Filler (not sure)

Suns give : Len, Bledsoe, 1st
Receive: Horford, and Sanders

Detroit Gives: Monroe
Detroit Receives: Teague, Illyasova

Atlanta gives: Teague and Horford
Atlanta Receives: Monroe, Len, Brandon Knight, 1st


SOMEONE MAKE IT WORK. After I finished I went. That was a mess lol

Dragic
Green
Warren
Horford
Sanders
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,696
And1: 5,591
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1239 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:30 pm

You don't get it. The suns don't need to reach a mutually beneficial deal. Bledsoe wants the max. Big Whoopdeedo. Unless some team actually offers it to him that has no impact. The Suns have challenged him to find a better deal than what they're offering. He hasn't been able to get that. Until he does there is absolutely zero, and I mean zero, reason to bid against ourself and add another year or more money. No player in the history of the NBA has signed a QO and left 48 mil on the table. If that's what he wants to do then so be it, but this idea that the suns should up their offer to something that's better for both parties is crazy. 48 mil is good for Bledsoe. In fact, it's the highest amount he's been offered.

paulpressey25 wrote:
JDLAW wrote:. A 5/65 deal is not much different than the 4/48 deal - a little higher base and an extra year.


It is a big difference. $17 million worth.

It works for Bledsoe because if he blows out his knee again at any point the next three years, he's still getting at least the $63 million he would have gotten with an offer sheet this year. And if he blows up, he uses the early termination provision like LeBron has and opts out while collecting say at least $46 million in those first three years. He then can re-up for a bigger deal if he's worth it then.

For the Suns, they really only risk the same $63-$65 million they risk now via an offer sheet, should his knees go bad. If he blows up, you've still got him for three years and hold his Bird rights. And he would have been worth that 3/$46 you would have paid him to date.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,291
And1: 6,424
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1240 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:38 pm

AtheJ415 wrote:You don't get it. The suns don't need to reach a mutually beneficial deal. Bledsoe wants the max. Big Whoopdeedo. Unless some team actually offers it to him that has no impact. The Suns have challenged him to find a better deal than what they're offering. He hasn't been able to get that. Until he does there is absolutely zero, and I mean zero, reason to bid against ourself and add another year or more money. No player in the history of the NBA has signed a QO and left 48 mil on the table. If that's what he wants to do then so be it, but this idea that the suns should up their offer to something that's better for both parties is crazy. 48 mil is good for Bledsoe. In fact, it's the highest amount he's been offered.

paulpressey25 wrote:
JDLAW wrote:. A 5/65 deal is not much different than the 4/48 deal - a little higher base and an extra year.


It is a big difference. $17 million worth.

It works for Bledsoe because if he blows out his knee again at any point the next three years, he's still getting at least the $63 million he would have gotten with an offer sheet this year. And if he blows up, he uses the early termination provision like LeBron has and opts out while collecting say at least $46 million in those first three years. He then can re-up for a bigger deal if he's worth it then.

For the Suns, they really only risk the same $63-$65 million they risk now via an offer sheet, should his knees go bad. If he blows up, you've still got him for three years and hold his Bird rights. And he would have been worth that 3/$46 you would have paid him to date.


I guess you're right... it would be pretty ridiculous to take the QO... That's a lot of money lost in one year that he'd have to make up on the next deal. Saying no to $12m/year would mean he'd have to make up the $8m lost in the first year over the course of the following 3 years, which means he'd need a salary of around $15 mil. Add the risk component to that, and it starts to look really dumb to say no to 4/$48.

Curious to see what happens.

Return to Phoenix Suns