ImageImageImage

The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 21,862
And1: 16,544
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1221 » by Saberestar » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:02 pm

sunskerr wrote:I'm not sure I care much for Barrett or Ingram. Poeltl is alright you could do worse. I know y'all are starved for athletic or physically talented guys under 30 but they ain't all that. You could also flip Poeltl for another pick but we know our FO ain't about that.

Id rather get more picks from the Spurs but if the Spurs aren't offering more picks I do like Barrett/Ingram more than Vassel and Keldon obviously.

But I'm guessing that Raptors talk is all bs because I don't know if KDs value is even that good. I think it's pretty low and we're just gonna have to suck it up with a mediocre return.

Just look at the Raptors roster. IF they are interested in KD it's why they are OK trading any combination of Ingram, Quickley, Barret and Poetl.

Ingram at $38M...so they can add Agbaji and one $3M guy to make the salaries work, but if they don't want to trade Ingram they would need to give us two of Barret/Quickley/Poetl.

The addition of #9 is the biggest mystery IMO. Are they open to trade it for KD next to those players?
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 14,654
And1: 8,468
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1222 » by BobbieL » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:06 pm

garrick wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
KdoubleDees23 wrote:Would yall do Beal for PG13 straight up


No

Beal expires a year before PG13

The smartest thing to do with Beal is just do nothing, have him stay home and become an expiring in a year.
Granted, that would cost Ishbia a lot of money

Ishbia screwed up with Little. To sign Bol Bol or Tyus Jones or some "vet min" player like Plumlee - he stretched Little which means he cannot stretch Beal now. So short sighted

It was absolutely moronic to stretch Little when it did nothing to get us under the 2nd apron.

This organization makes so many boneheaded moves it's like they are incapable of thinking more than a year ahead, like trading our 2031 pick for three low value first round picks because they wanted to get rid of Nurkic and attach a pick just to get rid of him.

Impatience is the name of the game for Ishbia and each move digs our hole deeper and deeper.


Which is why I think -- and again, I think Ishbia wants to stretch Beal more for lux tax reasons. But the thinking is if they stretch Beal - the Suns can sign a player with the MLE. Whereas I think letting Beal be an expiring contract in two years will give much more bang than signing "Royce O'neal" or "Grayson Allen" -- these guys are just nto moving the needle. Suck it up with Beal, two years, maybe have him stay home this year or better yet, be the sixth man on a team with Durant -- and next year he is an expiring so in the summer of 2027 - you have a bunch of cap space.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 14,654
And1: 8,468
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1223 » by BobbieL » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:10 pm

Saberestar wrote:
sunskerr wrote:I'm not sure I care much for Barrett or Ingram. Poeltl is alright you could do worse. I know y'all are starved for athletic or physically talented guys under 30 but they ain't all that. You could also flip Poeltl for another pick but we know our FO ain't about that.

Id rather get more picks from the Spurs but if the Spurs aren't offering more picks I do like Barrett/Ingram more than Vassel and Keldon obviously.

But I'm guessing that Raptors talk is all bs because I don't know if KDs value is even that good. I think it's pretty low and we're just gonna have to suck it up with a mediocre return.

Just look at the Raptors roster. IF they are interested in KD it's why they are OK trading any combination of Ingram, Quickley, Barret and Poetl.

Ingram at $38M...so they can add Agbaji and one $3M guy to make the salaries work, but if they don't want to trade Ingram they would need to give us two of Barret/Quickley/Poetl.

The addition of #9 is the biggest mystery IMO. Are they open to trade it for KD next to those players?


If the Knicks were trading OG, Robinson and Kolek - I probably like that more than Ingram, Poeltl and the 9th pick. I just am not sure Ingram next to Booker is the right roster construction. Again, another mid-range scorer - like Durant next to Booker.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 14,654
And1: 8,468
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1224 » by BobbieL » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:12 pm

Calvin Klein wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
KdoubleDees23 wrote:Would yall do Beal for PG13 straight up


No

Beal expires a year before PG13

The smartest thing to do with Beal is just do nothing, have him stay home and become an expiring in a year.
Granted, that would cost Ishbia a lot of money

Ishbia screwed up with Little. To sign Bol Bol or Tyus Jones or some "vet min" player like Plumlee - he stretched Little which means he cannot stretch Beal now. So short sighted



This is what people that say things like “why do you care about ishbia's wallet?” Don’t get. It’s not about spending money but about doing it wisely.
He is just a reckless buffoon


Personally, I don't care about Ishbia's wallet. I think the best thing to do with him is keep and have him be an expiring

I just meant that if Ishbia were able to stretch Beal - he would save so much money in lux tax payments - which is I think his goal.

From a long term basketball perspective - I think Beals expiring has much more value than whatever they get this year, in terms of helping the roster
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 21,862
And1: 16,544
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1225 » by Saberestar » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:42 pm

BobbieL wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
sunskerr wrote:I'm not sure I care much for Barrett or Ingram. Poeltl is alright you could do worse. I know y'all are starved for athletic or physically talented guys under 30 but they ain't all that. You could also flip Poeltl for another pick but we know our FO ain't about that.

Id rather get more picks from the Spurs but if the Spurs aren't offering more picks I do like Barrett/Ingram more than Vassel and Keldon obviously.

But I'm guessing that Raptors talk is all bs because I don't know if KDs value is even that good. I think it's pretty low and we're just gonna have to suck it up with a mediocre return.

Just look at the Raptors roster. IF they are interested in KD it's why they are OK trading any combination of Ingram, Quickley, Barret and Poetl.

Ingram at $38M...so they can add Agbaji and one $3M guy to make the salaries work, but if they don't want to trade Ingram they would need to give us two of Barret/Quickley/Poetl.

The addition of #9 is the biggest mystery IMO. Are they open to trade it for KD next to those players?


If the Knicks were trading OG, Robinson and Kolek - I probably like that more than Ingram, Poeltl and the 9th pick. I just am not sure Ingram next to Booker is the right roster construction. Again, another mid-range scorer - like Durant next to Booker.

I would take that offer from the Raptors in a second.

Robinson is worse than Poeltl. He can play meaningful minutes because of his horrible FT shooting and lack of basketball IQ.

Robinson is similar to Javale McGee and Poeltl can be compared to Gortat. Poetl better defender than Gortat and a bigger/longer than him.

#9 obviously is much better than gutting Kolek.

So you have to consider Anunoby MUCH much better than Ingram as a player, not only as a fit.
dremill24
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jan 11, 2016
Contact:

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1226 » by dremill24 » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:45 pm

Saberestar wrote:
sunskerr wrote:I'm not sure I care much for Barrett or Ingram. Poeltl is alright you could do worse. I know y'all are starved for athletic or physically talented guys under 30 but they ain't all that. You could also flip Poeltl for another pick but we know our FO ain't about that.

Id rather get more picks from the Spurs but if the Spurs aren't offering more picks I do like Barrett/Ingram more than Vassel and Keldon obviously.

But I'm guessing that Raptors talk is all bs because I don't know if KDs value is even that good. I think it's pretty low and we're just gonna have to suck it up with a mediocre return.

Just look at the Raptors roster. IF they are interested in KD it's why they are OK trading any combination of Ingram, Quickley, Barret and Poetl.

Ingram at $38M...so they can add Agbaji and one $3M guy to make the salaries work, but if they don't want to trade Ingram they would need to give us two of Barret/Quickley/Poetl.

The addition of #9 is the biggest mystery IMO. Are they open to trade it for KD next to those players?


I dont really think Toronto ia all that realistic, but putting that aside, if #9 isnt involved then theres really no reason to even have a conversation.
Trying out this Substack thing. Suns and NBA thoughts. Check it out: https://hoopsnexus.substack.com/
dremill24
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jan 11, 2016
Contact:

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1227 » by dremill24 » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:47 pm

Saberestar wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
Saberestar wrote:Just look at the Raptors roster. IF they are interested in KD it's why they are OK trading any combination of Ingram, Quickley, Barret and Poetl.

Ingram at $38M...so they can add Agbaji and one $3M guy to make the salaries work, but if they don't want to trade Ingram they would need to give us two of Barret/Quickley/Poetl.

The addition of #9 is the biggest mystery IMO. Are they open to trade it for KD next to those players?


If the Knicks were trading OG, Robinson and Kolek - I probably like that more than Ingram, Poeltl and the 9th pick. I just am not sure Ingram next to Booker is the right roster construction. Again, another mid-range scorer - like Durant next to Booker.

I would take that offer from the Raptors in a second.

Robinson is worse than Poeltl. He can play meaningful minutes because of his horrible FT shooting and lack of basketball IQ.

Robinson is similar to Javale McGee and Poeltl can be compared to Gortat. Poetl better defender than Gortat and a bigger/longer than him.

#9 obviously is much better than gutting Kolek.

So you have to consider Anunoby MUCH much better than Ingram as a player, not only as a fit.


There are more factors that play into the overall package but Anunoby being a better player and fit is a very easy stance to take IMO.
Trying out this Substack thing. Suns and NBA thoughts. Check it out: https://hoopsnexus.substack.com/
User avatar
sunsbum
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,410
And1: 5,198
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Portland
     

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1228 » by sunsbum » Sat Jun 7, 2025 5:58 pm

All these trades for KD feel like leftover dog water tbh. We give up prime players and picks for KD and only 2 years later get back b and c tier players teams don’t want?
"Mannnnn I’m like the guy that pissed this whole board off saying literally all year no Mikal, no Mikal in the KD trade."
Fo-Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,586
And1: 5,367
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1229 » by Fo-Real » Sat Jun 7, 2025 6:45 pm

sunsbum wrote:All these trades for KD feel like leftover dog water tbh. We give up prime players and picks for KD and only 2 years later get back b and c tier players teams don’t want?


Like getting divorced, cant get your time back or all the money or effort back! Move on, stop wishing it different. **** is what it is.
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 15,802
And1: 8,748
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1230 » by Ghost of Kleine » Sat Jun 7, 2025 7:27 pm

Bogyo wrote:I think a lot of these teams are trying to shed salary - or at least rumoured to. So Minny and Cavs in particular are not likely to be serious suitors in the KD sweepstakes as this would defeat their main purpose.

I wouldn't mind Poetl and RJ for KD (no picks and extra players, sorry GoK that package is just aint happening). Then we just have to find a PG for the Grayson/O'neale contract and whatever we pick up on the way.
PG/Book/RJ/Dunn/Poetl - bench of Morris/Gillespie/Beal (sorry not getting rid of him either, maybe he tries to reinvent himself in that role)/whoever is left of Grayson or O'neale, Bol, Plum, Osho, Richards and our draft picks, plus maybe a vet min PF. Problem is size on the wings, rebounding and overall talent, but I'm pretty sure more watchable than this years crew.


Sure! Teams might be looking to reduce salary, but then KD as a 54 million expiring contract still accomplishes that by a large amount. Getting 54 million off your books while also having KD as a rental for any potential contending teams obviously accomplishes both goals! Being very competitive and having a chance to contend, but then also having a " get out of cap hell free" card as well.

Now we for the Raptors trade premise, of course you're entitled to your opinions on what they might or might not do in a trade for KD, but I'll respectfully disagree with you that package of Poetl and Barrett ( NO PICKS or extra players) gets them anywhere close to acquiring KD.

I mean sure they can try and lowball us for KD with only being willing to swap Barrett and Poetl for KD. But then we can just laugh and hang up rather quickly and just look at one if the other 4-6 interested teams that absolutely will be willing to give up picks in a KD trade.

I'll also point out these couple of points to consider:

1- The suns front office has already put out the reports stating that they want to get a trade done prior to the draft, indicating that they will prioritize picks along with players in any KD trade package. So without those inclusions those teams aren't getting KD.

2- KDs' camp and KD him self has stated that San Antonio is at the top of his list. So a KD to Toronto trade is highly unlikely anyways. And those teams premised packages already include quality pick inclusions. So either Toronto gets serious and ups there offer, or else they can stay on the outside looking in!

3- Barrett is solid, but far from considered a legitimate centerpiece value in a trade for a player of KDs' value. And Poetl although good too and a starting center, is still pretty limited offensively and is fairly similar to what we already have in Nik Richards.

He can't really space the floor. He's not very mobile, and he's solid defensively, but nowhere near elite. Basically we could get a similar starting center to Poetl through free agency or even through the draft with his exact skillset at a reaction of the cost.

Heck, Bidatze could be better than Poetl and we could likely get him without having to trade KD. We could get any of Lopez, Adams, Capela, etc just by virtue of cap reduction/ cap flexibility through expirings. Or we could get Vucevic for a late first. So why would we just take a package of Barrett and Poetl for KD when we have multiple mechanisms to get a starting center without giving up KD and NOT GETTING PICKS??

Any trade of KD to Toronto would have to include a BASELINE RETURN of Barrett/ Poetl ( for salary matching purposes) and one or two fillers/ AND at least the 9th and 39th picks AND a future 1st ( 28' or 30' will do) otherwise the Suns won't even waste their time. :nod:
Image
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 15,802
And1: 8,748
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1231 » by Ghost of Kleine » Sat Jun 7, 2025 7:48 pm

Saberestar wrote:
sunskerr wrote:I'm not sure I care much for Barrett or Ingram. Poeltl is alright you could do worse. I know y'all are starved for athletic or physically talented guys under 30 but they ain't all that. You could also flip Poeltl for another pick but we know our FO ain't about that.

Id rather get more picks from the Spurs but if the Spurs aren't offering more picks I do like Barrett/Ingram more than Vassel and Keldon obviously.

But I'm guessing that Raptors talk is all bs because I don't know if KDs value is even that good. I think it's pretty low and we're just gonna have to suck it up with a mediocre return.

Just look at the Raptors roster. IF they are interested in KD it's why they are OK trading any combination of Ingram, Quickley, Barret and Poetl.

Ingram at $38M...so they can add Agbaji and one $3M guy to make the salaries work, but if they don't want to trade Ingram they would need to give us two of Barret/Quickley/Poetl.

The addition of #9 is the biggest mystery IMO. Are they open to trade it for KD next to those players?


The pick would be a non negotiable for me. Sure Barrett and Poetl are solid, but neither are really centerpiece players, Sure I'd take Barrett, and Toronto including BOTH Barrett and Poetl would be necessary just by virtue of their cap situation and needing to come as close to salary matching as possible to try and maintain any post trade flexibility.

As for Poetl, he's a solid defensive center, but still very limited in skillset, he can't really space the floor, doesn't possess any real outlier abilities, and is making 20 million a year. Basically he's more or less a basic center in the Capela/ Nurkic/ Richards archetypes. Only he's not as athletic as Capela, even though he's more mobile than Nurkic, he can't really playmaker as well and also can't space the floor.

He's really closest to Nik Richards. Only he makes 20 million to Richards 5 million. And I would have Bidatze as the better value. Overall his archetype and limited skillset, we could just as easily fill in free agency by getting back expirings and buying them out and signing any of Lopez, Turner, Capela, Adams, etc.

So Poetl isn't really a centerpiece value either. The Raptors would have to make up the value elsewhere, with young players and picks. Anything less just wouldn't be worth our time. But a package of Barrett/ Poetl/ 9th pick/ 39th pick/ 28' or 30' 1st would be plenty competitive enough to get a deal done.

Because for my part, I'd trade back with Brooklyn! Barrett/ 9th pick for Cam Johnson/ Clowney/ 19th pick/ 26th pick/ 36th pick. Then I'm trading Allen/ Richards/ CLE 27' 1st to Orlando for Isaac/ Bidatze/ ORL 26' 2nd.
Image
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 15,802
And1: 8,748
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1232 » by Ghost of Kleine » Sat Jun 7, 2025 7:53 pm

KdoubleDees23 wrote:
Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Saberestar wrote:If this is true I think the Raptors could give us one of the best packages for KD.

First and foremost the #9 pick. I think this is the best pick that we can get in this year's draft.

Then...Brandon Ingram. He hasn't even played yet for them, so it would make sense to trade him for an upgrade at his position.

After these two pieces everything that we can get more (hopefully another pick + a decent role player as a filler) would be a plus.


Absolutely man! Although depending upon who's there on the board, I'm not sure I'd keep it! Honestly, I'd most likely acquire it to trade it back with Brooklyn for that Cam Johnson and the 19th pick package! Being able to get Cam John back AND add another pick too would be huge for us I'd think. :D

Maybe first a package of:

1- KD for Barrett/ Poetl/ Dick/ 9th pick/ 39th pick/ 28' 1st/ 30' 1st.

2- ** Then I'm trading Barrett/ 9th pick to Brooklyn for Cam Johnson/ Clowney/ 19th pick/ 26th pick/ 36th pick.

3- ** Trading Allen/ Richards to Orlando for Isaac/ Bidatze/ ORL 26' 2nd.

This would give us.......................................

Paul/ Booker/ Isaac/ Johnson/ Poetl.
Saraf/ Trent Jr/ Dunn/ Clowney/ Bidatze.
Gillespie/ Dick / Thiero/ Ighodaro/ Raynaud.

19th pick- Raynaud. Gasol/ Sengun/ Divac.
26th pick- Saraf. Dragic/ Ginobli.
29th pick- Thiero. OG Anunoby.
36th pick- James. Marcus Smart/ D Bane.
52nd pick- Goldin. Ivaca Zubac.

G League two ways ( 3-allowed)

1- Obinna anuchili Killen. Camara/ Siakim.
2- Sion James. Smart/ Bane.
3- Vladislav Goldin. Ivaca Zubac.


Hate to be the bad news bears but KD wont get Dick ! Barrett, Poetl, and all those picks, the raptors wouldn't do. That is way too much for 37 year old (by the season) KD


Opinions being respectfully noted, you might end up surprised at what KD might return man! And it's important to remember that there'll be multiple suitors which will inevitably create a bidding war and drive up value more.

Now add in the likelihood of Giannis not seeking a trade this season, and then that increases teams bidding for KD now that Giannis is unavailable! Supply and demand working in our favor. It's going to get really interesting for sure. Really our only major setback could be our front office's inexperience leading to an unfavorable outcome.

But not due to lack of market value or interest. :D
Image
User avatar
sunsbum
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,410
And1: 5,198
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Portland
     

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1233 » by sunsbum » Sat Jun 7, 2025 7:54 pm

If this is a suns/spurs trade exclusively I think the suns should be asking for sochan or castle as staring points. If they don’t want to give up castle they can give us the #2/sochan or sochan and this years 14 and a couple of future firsts. They have the luxury of being able to replace castle with the #2 pick, surely we should be able to leverage one of those two scenarios instead of vassle.
"Mannnnn I’m like the guy that pissed this whole board off saying literally all year no Mikal, no Mikal in the KD trade."
Slim Charless
RealGM
Posts: 11,527
And1: 7,267
Joined: May 10, 2019
   

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1234 » by Slim Charless » Sat Jun 7, 2025 7:57 pm

sunsbum wrote:If this is a suns/spurs trade exclusively I think the suns should be asking for sochan or castle as staring points. If they don’t want to give up castle they can give us the #2/sochan or sochan and this years 14 and a couple of future firsts. They have the luxury of being able to replace castle with the #2 pick, surely we should be able to leverage one of those two scenarios instead of vassle.


I'd be happy with either Castle or #2 plus filler. I don't think we can get much on top of that. I think if I'm them, I would rather trade #2 as Castle seems to fit next to Fox and is already there, but Harper has superstar potential.

That's gonna be a tough sell though. We need the Giannis thing to go in our favor. Badly.
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,526
And1: 9,748
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1235 » by King4Day » Sat Jun 7, 2025 8:01 pm

sunsbum wrote:If this is a suns/spurs trade exclusively I think the suns should be asking for sochan or castle as staring points. If they don’t want to give up castle they can give us the #2/sochan or sochan and this years 14 and a couple of future firsts. They have the luxury of being able to replace castle with the #2 pick, surely we should be able to leverage one of those two scenarios instead of vassle.


I don't see Castle or the #2 being in play.
I would be disappointed if the return was Vassel, Barnes, 14 and maybe another 1st. I think we should push for Sochan. For me, Sochan and 14 and I'd be fine with whatever else is done to make money work.
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 15,802
And1: 8,748
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1236 » by Ghost of Kleine » Sat Jun 7, 2025 8:09 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
User avatar
sunsbum
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,410
And1: 5,198
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Portland
     

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1237 » by sunsbum » Sat Jun 7, 2025 8:10 pm

King4Day wrote:
sunsbum wrote:If this is a suns/spurs trade exclusively I think the suns should be asking for sochan or castle as staring points. If they don’t want to give up castle they can give us the #2/sochan or sochan and this years 14 and a couple of future firsts. They have the luxury of being able to replace castle with the #2 pick, surely we should be able to leverage one of those two scenarios instead of vassle.


I don't see Castle or the #2 being in play.
I would be disappointed if the return was Vassel, Barnes, 14 and maybe another 1st. I think we should push for Sochan. For me, Sochan and 14 and I'd be fine with whatever else is done to make money work.
I agree, I would settle with sochan/barnes and a couple of picks. If they only want to trade vassel they can eat rocks and kick my shorts.
"Mannnnn I’m like the guy that pissed this whole board off saying literally all year no Mikal, no Mikal in the KD trade."
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 15,802
And1: 8,748
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1238 » by Ghost of Kleine » Sat Jun 7, 2025 8:16 pm

King4Day wrote:
sunsbum wrote:If this is a suns/spurs trade exclusively I think the suns should be asking for sochan or castle as staring points. If they don’t want to give up castle they can give us the #2/sochan or sochan and this years 14 and a couple of future firsts. They have the luxury of being able to replace castle with the #2 pick, surely we should be able to leverage one of those two scenarios instead of vassle.


I don't see Castle or the #2 being in play.
I would be disappointed if the return was Vassel, Barnes, 14 and maybe another 1st. I think we should push for Sochan. For me, Sochan and 14 and I'd be fine with whatever else is done to make money work.


The ideal KD package from the Spurs should be Vassell/ Barnes/ Sochan/ 14th pick/ 38th pick/ ATL 27' 1st.

And if Vassell isn't included in the trade, then the trade value needs to be replaced with more draft assets. And might become Barnes/ Johnson/ Sochan/ 14th pick/ 38th pick/ ATL 27' 1st/ 30' 1st swap via DAL (unprotected) or MIN ( Top 2 protected).

But Sochan should be a salary filler regardless. Castle just isn't happening and the # 2 isn't either. But we should at least ask.
Image
Blonde
Veteran
Posts: 2,897
And1: 3,876
Joined: Jun 16, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1239 » by Blonde » Sat Jun 7, 2025 8:19 pm

SAS don’t have a single thing I want besides Castle and picks (unless Fox is in play but why would he be). A whole lot of 5th-10th men on their roster that they would love to turn into KD. None of the guys we’re talking about (Sochan, Barnes, Vassell, Keldon) are in their future plans.
schnakenpopanz
General Manager
Posts: 8,838
And1: 3,106
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Location: Germany
Contact:
 

Re: The Official 2025 Offseason Thread Part 2 

Post#1240 » by schnakenpopanz » Sat Jun 7, 2025 8:20 pm

Ghost of Kleine wrote:
King4Day wrote:
sunsbum wrote:If this is a suns/spurs trade exclusively I think the suns should be asking for sochan or castle as staring points. If they don’t want to give up castle they can give us the #2/sochan or sochan and this years 14 and a couple of future firsts. They have the luxury of being able to replace castle with the #2 pick, surely we should be able to leverage one of those two scenarios instead of vassle.


I don't see Castle or the #2 being in play.
I would be disappointed if the return was Vassel, Barnes, 14 and maybe another 1st. I think we should push for Sochan. For me, Sochan and 14 and I'd be fine with whatever else is done to make money work.


The ideal KD package from the Spurs should be Vassell/ Barnes/ Sochan/ 14th pick/ 38th pick/ ATL 27' 1st.

And if Vassell isn't included in the trade, then the trade value needs to be replaced with more draft assets. And might become Barnes/ Johnson/ Sochan/ 14th pick/ 38th pick/ ATL 27' 1st/ 30' 1st swap via DAL (unprotected) or MIN ( Top 2 protected).

But Sochan should be a salary filler regardless. Castle just isn't happening and the # 2 isn't either. But we should at least ask.

I'd like to fancy myself with Scarlett Johansson. At least I can ask right? :D
Ishiba is a BUSINESS MAN!

Return to Phoenix Suns