RaisingArizona wrote:O'Neale is always bricking wide open 3s
Hoist ONeal = Chuck Chowder
1 hot shooting game out of 4
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
RaisingArizona wrote:O'Neale is always bricking wide open 3s
Frank Lee wrote:RaisingArizona wrote:O'Neale is always bricking wide open 3s
Hoist ONeal = Chuck Chowder
1 hot shooting game out of 4
sunsbg wrote:Only 3-4 wins behind 8th spot. Let's stay positive.
BobbieL wrote:sunsbg wrote:Only 3-4 wins behind 8th spot. Let's stay positive.
I am positive the best thing that can happen is: that the team misses the play-offs, Ishbia blows it up, fires James Jones, he can even fire Budenholzer, thats not my mon ey -- but hire a GM that will trade Booker and Durant and try to move Allen &/or O'Neal. Its time - get young players, get cap picks, get cap flexibility
sunsbg wrote:BobbieL wrote:sunsbg wrote:Only 3-4 wins behind 8th spot. Let's stay positive.
I am positive the best thing that can happen is: that the team misses the play-offs, Ishbia blows it up, fires James Jones, he can even fire Budenholzer, thats not my mon ey -- but hire a GM that will trade Booker and Durant and try to move Allen &/or O'Neal. Its time - get young players, get cap picks, get cap flexibility
I was just replacing Saber's positivity as he's not doing it anymore. Someone needs to keep the spirit high.
RaisingArizona wrote:So glad KD stayed so we can miss the playoffs without having any assets to improve moving forward.
bwgood77 wrote:I feel kind of sorry for the Mavs. I hope they do make the playoffs and can get healthy by then because I think with a frontcourt of AD, Lively and Gafford in addition to all the other guys they have, they could be very tough.
Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Things we kind of already knew. But what would the true logistics be for this?
I still say the package would be centered around Randle/ Reid/ Dillingham/ DET 25' 1st/ MIN 32' 1st. Trevor Lane discusses the above potential possibilities.
SunsRback4Good wrote:RaisingArizona wrote:So glad KD stayed so we can miss the playoffs without having any assets to improve moving forward.
We didn’t need Jimmy butler, besides he’s a better fit with the Dubs. Jimmy wants a fat contract it would have crippled our future and set us back. We just need to trade KD & Booker and get a nice haul for them rebuilding properly.
Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Things we kind of already knew. But what would the true logistics be for this?
I still say the package would be centered around Randle/ Reid/ Dillingham/ DET 25' 1st/ MIN 32' 1st. Trevor Lane discusses the above potential possibilities.
Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Things we kind of already knew. But what would the true logistics be for this?
I still say the package would be centered around Randle/ Reid/ Dillingham/ DET 25' 1st/ MIN 32' 1st. Trevor Lane discusses the above potential possibilities.
Saberestar wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Things we kind of already knew. But what would the true logistics be for this?
I still say the package would be centered around Randle/ Reid/ Dillingham/ DET 25' 1st/ MIN 32' 1st. Trevor Lane discusses the above potential possibilities.
I don't want Randle at all. I know he is a good player but he is too selfish and his defense is always meh.
If we decide to trade KD and the Wolves are serious about get him I would ask to get McDaniels for sure. I wouldn't entertain any Wolves offer if he is not on the package. Period.
McDaniels is 24 years old and improving yet and he is under contract until 2029.
Add to McDaniels the 2028 and 2032 unprotected FRPs. And then you can add some swaps and 2nds.
Then we can add Naz Reid and Dillingham to match salaries and have more upside on the roster.
BobbieL wrote:Saberestar wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:
Things we kind of already knew. But what would the true logistics be for this?
I still say the package would be centered around Randle/ Reid/ Dillingham/ DET 25' 1st/ MIN 32' 1st. Trevor Lane discusses the above potential possibilities.
I don't want Randle at all. I know he is a good player but he is too selfish and his defense is always meh.
If we decide to trade KD and the Wolves are serious about get him I would ask to get McDaniels for sure. I wouldn't entertain any Wolves offer if he is not on the package. Period.
McDaniels is 24 years old and improving yet and he is under contract until 2029.
Add to McDaniels the 2028 and 2032 unprotected FRPs. And then you can add some swaps and 2nds.
Then we can add Naz Reid and Dillingham to match salaries and have more upside on the roster.
I would take Randle to make the math work as long as McDaniels is part of the "math" - I hear what you are saying but in a Durant deal and probably a Booker deal - there might be a bad contract thrown in there. And looking at the "math" - for Durant, I think it would have to be Randle + McDaniels for Durant. Randle expires next year - so thats tolerable - at least for me if you get the other two draft picks you mention.
mkot wrote:bwgood77 wrote:I feel kind of sorry for the Mavs. I hope they do make the playoffs and can get healthy by then because I think with a frontcourt of AD, Lively and Gafford in addition to all the other guys they have, they could be very tough.
I'm rooting for them to fail until the team is sold to another owner.
The fans don't deserve this, the players certainly don't deserve this, the ownership and front office certainly do. It's fine you want to trade Luka, it's the way they handle the whole debacle, how they talk **** to Luka on his way out, the way they treat their fans and not making Luka available to 28 other teams. I can't root for Luka because of that jersey
Saberestar wrote:BobbieL wrote:Saberestar wrote:I don't want Randle at all. I know he is a good player but he is too selfish and his defense is always meh.
If we decide to trade KD and the Wolves are serious about get him I would ask to get McDaniels for sure. I wouldn't entertain any Wolves offer if he is not on the package. Period.
McDaniels is 24 years old and improving yet and he is under contract until 2029.
Add to McDaniels the 2028 and 2032 unprotected FRPs. And then you can add some swaps and 2nds.
Then we can add Naz Reid and Dillingham to match salaries and have more upside on the roster.
I would take Randle to make the math work as long as McDaniels is part of the "math" - I hear what you are saying but in a Durant deal and probably a Booker deal - there might be a bad contract thrown in there. And looking at the "math" - for Durant, I think it would have to be Randle + McDaniels for Durant. Randle expires next year - so thats tolerable - at least for me if you get the other two draft picks you mention.
Well, in that case I would ask for every swap and every 2nd available.