bwgood77 wrote:
I like how their actual mock has us taking Jackson over Ball.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Kerrsed wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
I like how their actual mock has us taking Jackson over Ball.
Phnxsports wrote:I have never been a Lonzo Ball guy but this just makes it that much worse for whoever takes him. This is hilarious.
http://amp.usatoday.com/story/99126082/
kennydorglas wrote:Phnxsports wrote:I have never been a Lonzo Ball guy but this just makes it that much worse for whoever takes him. This is hilarious.
http://amp.usatoday.com/story/99126082/
Yep, no thanks for Lonzo and his brothers.
bwgood77 wrote:I think we wasted a high pick on Knight. Sure our highest pick we didn't got for Noel and instead went for Len. Of course we took Booker, when our apparent top choices, Kaminsky and WCS were off the board. There really wasn't anyone worth taking over Warren with that pick. But yeah, we did got with Bender over Murray last year.
Zelaznyrules wrote:kennydorglas wrote:Phnxsports wrote:I have never been a Lonzo Ball guy but this just makes it that much worse for whoever takes him. This is hilarious.
http://amp.usatoday.com/story/99126082/
Yep, no thanks for Lonzo and his brothers.
I'm really torn. I think there's a pretty good chance he'll be the best player in this class and IMO there's virtually no chance that he won't be better than Fultz or Jackson. But his dad? I don't want any part of him and if your interviews don't convince you that you can separate the son from The Mouth, I'd seriously consider passing too. And by pass I mean trade him to the Lakers for their number 3 pick this season and a future number 1 (two of them if they'll bite).
Zelaznyrules wrote:kennydorglas wrote:Phnxsports wrote:I have never been a Lonzo Ball guy but this just makes it that much worse for whoever takes him. This is hilarious.
http://amp.usatoday.com/story/99126082/
Yep, no thanks for Lonzo and his brothers.
I'm really torn. I think there's a pretty good chance he'll be the best player in this class and IMO there's virtually no chance that he won't be better than Fultz or Jackson. But his dad? I don't want any part of him and if your interviews don't convince you that you can separate the son from The Mouth, I'd seriously consider passing too. And by pass I mean trade him to the Lakers for their number 3 pick this season and a future number 1 (two of them if they'll bite).
Mulhollanddrive wrote:He flunked against Arizona, if you take away the narrative where he takes credit for all the wins and ignore the losses, he's not close to the best player this draft.
LaVar Ball has a price for his sons: $1 billion.
The father of UCLA guard Lonzo Ball and his brothers LiAngelo and LaMelo, high schoolers who are also committed to the Bruins, said he's looking for a packaged shoe deal involving his three sons that would be worth $1 billion.
"A billion dollars, it has to be there," Ball told USA Today in an article published Monday. "That's our number, a billion, straight out of the gate. And you don't even have to give it to me all up front. Give us $100 million a year."
LaVar said last month that if Lonzo didn't sign with Nike, Adidas or Under Armour when he left college for the NBA, he would sign with the Big Baller Brand.
LaVar filed for the trademark to the phrase last year, and was granted the trademark last week for use on athletic apparel. Ball is still waiting for the trademark to the actual logo, which features three "B's" for the sons and the motto "Built For This."
Villalobos wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/18901427/lavar-ball-seeks-combined-1-billion-shoe-deal-three-sonsLaVar Ball has a price for his sons: $1 billion.
The father of UCLA guard Lonzo Ball and his brothers LiAngelo and LaMelo, high schoolers who are also committed to the Bruins, said he's looking for a packaged shoe deal involving his three sons that would be worth $1 billion.
"A billion dollars, it has to be there," Ball told USA Today in an article published Monday. "That's our number, a billion, straight out of the gate. And you don't even have to give it to me all up front. Give us $100 million a year."
LaVar said last month that if Lonzo didn't sign with Nike, Adidas or Under Armour when he left college for the NBA, he would sign with the Big Baller Brand.
LaVar filed for the trademark to the phrase last year, and was granted the trademark last week for use on athletic apparel. Ball is still waiting for the trademark to the actual logo, which features three "B's" for the sons and the motto "Built For This."
Poor kids.
MrMiyagi wrote:Villalobos wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/18901427/lavar-ball-seeks-combined-1-billion-shoe-deal-three-sonsLaVar Ball has a price for his sons: $1 billion.
The father of UCLA guard Lonzo Ball and his brothers LiAngelo and LaMelo, high schoolers who are also committed to the Bruins, said he's looking for a packaged shoe deal involving his three sons that would be worth $1 billion.
"A billion dollars, it has to be there," Ball told USA Today in an article published Monday. "That's our number, a billion, straight out of the gate. And you don't even have to give it to me all up front. Give us $100 million a year."
LaVar said last month that if Lonzo didn't sign with Nike, Adidas or Under Armour when he left college for the NBA, he would sign with the Big Baller Brand.
LaVar filed for the trademark to the phrase last year, and was granted the trademark last week for use on athletic apparel. Ball is still waiting for the trademark to the actual logo, which features three "B's" for the sons and the motto "Built For This."
Poor kids.
See, this looks like the alienation won't be between Lonzo and whatever franchise gets him, but Lonzo and his Dad. Off court branding is the where LaVar is seeing green. Lonzo will probably be sick of him saying stupid **** like this, affecting potential deals with Nike, Under Armor, and Adidas which'll hurt LONZO's revenue. He'll be hearing guys talking sponsor money once he gets into the league, and he'll want in on that. I doubt "BBB" is very lucrative, and certainly not scaleable. Put "BBB" in front of Mark Cuban on Shark Tank, and I doubt he'd get anyone to partner with him. It's just a brand name. T-Shirts and hats are easy to order from a company to slap a logo on, but you can't do that with shoes, and it'll cost a lot of money to get into that game if you want to compete with the sneaker giants.
Franchises can only do so much given the CBA, there really is no trouble to cause there. Once Lonzo starts seeing how much money he's not getting, he'll start to re-evaluate his dad's business savvy and start to make decisions on his own.
jcsunsfan wrote:MrMiyagi wrote:Villalobos wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/18901427/lavar-ball-seeks-combined-1-billion-shoe-deal-three-sons
Poor kids.
See, this looks like the alienation won't be between Lonzo and whatever franchise gets him, but Lonzo and his Dad. Off court branding is the where LaVar is seeing green. Lonzo will probably be sick of him saying stupid **** like this, affecting potential deals with Nike, Under Armor, and Adidas which'll hurt LONZO's revenue. He'll be hearing guys talking sponsor money once he gets into the league, and he'll want in on that. I doubt "BBB" is very lucrative, and certainly not scaleable. Put "BBB" in front of Mark Cuban on Shark Tank, and I doubt he'd get anyone to partner with him. It's just a brand name. T-Shirts and hats are easy to order from a company to slap a logo on, but you can't do that with shoes, and it'll cost a lot of money to get into that game if you want to compete with the sneaker giants.
Franchises can only do so much given the CBA, there really is no trouble to cause there. Once Lonzo starts seeing how much money he's not getting, he'll start to re-evaluate his dad's business savvy and start to make decisions on his own.
This is Lonzo's money. It's his career. Where does a dad get off trying to cash in on his kid like this.
carey wrote:Do you have kids? Honest question. I don't like his attitude but half the reason this kid is in this position is the work his dad put in to get him there. Yes he is talented but the rest is work & a lot of that falls on the parents. I do think this goes beyond advocating for his sons but i don't see any difference in what he does and what another company does. Only where the money is going.