ImageImageImage

The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft)

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Which free agent(s) would you most like to go for? One or top two choices

Barnes at max
0
No votes
Bazemore $20 per for 4, maybe S&T Knight for
3
8%
Dudley at $13 per for 3
3
8%
Marvin Williams at $16 per for 3
2
5%
West $10 per for 2 (likely with player option on 2nd)
6
16%
Leuer $8 per for 2
10
27%
Wait out a few days and monitor who is left
8
22%
Don't go after anyone
5
14%
 
Total votes: 37

TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1281 » by TeamTragic » Fri Jul 1, 2016 3:52 am

NavLDO wrote:
GoranTragic wrote:
NavLDO wrote:
Yes, yes, you are, because you are freaking clueless.

You want to label Len a bust, who's had all of 93 games starting experience--just over a season--and 189 total games played--roughly 2 seasons and some change total game experience. He's a 7'1" 260 lb C/PF, who was coached up by a former Guard, and has little to no idea how to use him properly. Yet are ok with paying $13M per for a 34 YO C who has ZERO range on his shot (77% at the rim, 12.5% from 3-to-10ft, for a total of 90% of his shots taken from within 10 ft), yet Alex, who shot 66.7% (44.3% at Rim/ 22.4% from within 10 ft, yet the other nearly 34% coming from 10ft or greater, as opposed to Chandler's , played over a minute less per game than Chandler, yet scored almost 2 PPG more than Chandler, 1 TRB less/gm, yet had .1 more BLKS/gm than Chandler--so taking all that into consideration, you are ready to give up on our top 5 pick from 3 years ago, who, BTW, after Horny was fired, delivered 14 DBL-DBLs playing an avg 28.8 MPG, avg'd 12.1 PPG, 9.9 TRB,1.8 Asst/gm in 32 gms. Oh yeah, total bust.

And your superstar Chandler? Well, let's see how he started off his career compared to Len. I mean, Tyson was selected 2nd overall in 2001; Len was 5th overall in 2013.

Let's look at their first 3 seasons, shall we?

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=1&y1=2004&p1=chandty01&y2=2016&p2=lenal01&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=

Len started 93 games of 189 played; Chandler started 107 of 181 played. Funny how you mention 'downward trend' when he played in more games, and started more games than either of his 1st two seasons...oops...1st 'myth' debunked'. He scored more PPG and had more TRB/gm last season than he did in either of his 1st two seasons....oops...2nd 'myth' debunked. Yet Chandler had fewer PPG and games played from his 2nd to 3rd season, yet amazingly, he survived his downward trend quite well wouldn't you say?

Yet Tyson outpaced Len in FG%s in his 1st 3 seasons. Well, I should hope so, since as you see below, nearly 60% of his shots were from 3ft in, whereas Len had just over 38% of his FGA from 3ft in. Yet, when we look at FT Attempts, we see that Len had the clear advantage of shooting FTs with a 71.4% clip compared to Chander's 61.8% FT%.

FG Atempts (3ft in/Total):
1st Season -- Len: 37 of 78 vs Chandler's: 202 of 304
2nd Season -- Len: 192 of 353 vs Chandler's: 282 of 484
3rd Season -- Len: 276 of 623 vs Chandler's: 79 of 159
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total -- Len 405 of 1054 vs Chandler: 563 of 947
38.4% vs 59.5%

Then let's look at TRBs. Chandler, despite playing 297 total more minutes than Len during his 1st 3 seasons, ended up producing 20 total fewer TRBs than Len.

And how about per36 stats. Well, you'll see Len with .1 fewer Assts than Chandler, but again, outrebounding him 11.2 vs 10.1, but alas, with .2 total fewer pts per36, .4 fewer BLKS, though equal numbers of STLs and TOVs.
So, seeing that Len is actually IMPROVING, as opposed to this mythical 'downward trend' you speak of, and of which, includes Len's 14 Dbl-Dbls in his final 32 games of the season, and while yes, he has some work to do, and trails Chandler in many of the advanced stats, the fact that Len's had quite the surge in performance as soon as Watson took over for Hornacek. leads me to the assumption that he'll continue to improve, and thus, is FAR more likely to 'succeed' than to 'bust' as you are predicting him to.


GoranTragic wrote:Except we barely used Chandler properly. In fact most stats above are not that far apart. Of course Len will move quicker than Chandler. I will leave you with this:

Chandler won a championship. He wasn't a ring chaser. He was an integral part. Remove Chandler and the Mavericks would have NEVER won the championship against Miami.

Len can barely stay on the court. -- What part of the veritable NON-DIFFERENCE in missed playing time between Len and Chandler in their 1st 3 years did you miss?? Apparently, all of it.


-- And Chandler could barely start with how many Centers on his team in his 1st 3 years in the league?--Bagaric and Curry. He wasn't a consistent starter on his team until his SIXTH season...on his SECOND team. You gonna give Len that much time to win his spot? Oh wait, he already has??

-- Kind of like how Chicago didn't miss Chandler...nor did the NOH...nor did CHA...nor did DAL...nor did NYK...



Ah, another crystal-baller...and apparently, you completely ignored most of the info I provided, so there's no point in arguing with you on this. You act like you know something, yet you know nothing. That's the difference between types like you and types like me; you try to make statements of certainty, knowing it will never catch up with you on a message forum, and the rest of us, make statements of reason. So you go ahead and act like your an NBA GM...run along back to your NBA2K16, or whatever they call those things.


Since apparently you are more knowledgeable how about a sig bet? I'm going to say that Len is going to get injured again this year at least twice and of course it will be his ankle/foot.

Followed by excuses from everyone on this board about his performance being "limited" due to his injuries. Sound good? :D
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,318
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1282 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jul 1, 2016 3:57 am

lilfishi22 wrote:
saintEscaton wrote:
dantley4prez wrote:
You guys pencil in his greatness because "he was a first option rookie." So?

Now you're comparing him to Kevin Durant? You don't think that's a little much?

O.J. Mayo had a pretty good rookie year, too. Perspective.

Knight is currently better than Booker. All I have to do is cite numbers in order to prove it.


Yeah you would think with the way he is being talked up as a surefire franchise player, Book was at least on par with rookie Kyrie/Tyreke both who were above replacement when baptized by fire with no one else to carry the load. But he wasn't and besides his 30 point bursts and aggregate scoring milestones wasn't all that more impressive than rookie Lavine,who is widely considered an inferior prospect due to his lack of BBIQ. "But he's 19 the sky is the limit, look at KD's early struggles he will have a similar career trajectory. Dat eyetest tho"

I loooove me some Booker but you and Dant are 100% correct. As good as Booker has been, his numbers are hardly historic. Is it special for his draft class? For sure. But let's not confuse the best rookie we've drafted since Amare with some of the best rookies post-Lebron.

Knight has his flaws but he's still a better player than Booker is right now. That may change as soon as the middle of next season but fact is, there is a lot about the NBA, the grind, the nuances and the competition that Booker still needs to experience, understand and fight through. These are aspects of the game that Knight has learn from by being around the game for the past 5 seasons.


Booker's #s didn't end up looking so good, and his defense obviously sucks, but honestly, when Knight came back from injury, Booker went into the tank. Knight does not make anyone better. He gets his numbers at the detriment of everyone else. If he has a great game or things are going well, he will start to share the wealth a little. If a close game is on the line, he will choke 9 times out of 10. I watched every game this season.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1283 » by JMac1 » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:04 am

saintEscaton wrote:
JMac1 wrote:Just for the board. Rhetorical. Why do you guys act as if you really have to be some defensive of god to play in the NBA? Anyone with half of a brain knows MOST defense is based off of reputation and favoritism. Curry and Klay reaches on every play. With them its good D, with Booker or other non-stars its a foul.

I swear most of the times Booker is like "what the hell do you want me to do?"

Not worried.


Excuses excuses. Booker has to earn his no calls. I'm more concerned about his off ball rotational awareness and hopefully he learns when to fight over the top or go under screens, taking the right angle so he isn't brushed squarely
Image



Busted... He just sucks. I thought I'd get away with saying that NBA defense is bull.... Oh well. You caught me making up things such as superstar calls :roll:
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1284 » by JMac1 » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:06 am

Every is saying Knight is better than Booker. lol. Well some people, lol. Knight is only 24 and if he is better than Booker it should be no problem trading him for a great haul, right?! Ooops....there's your answer.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1285 » by JMac1 » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:12 am

Man the Cubs relief pitching is **** horrible! :banghead: :evil:
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1286 » by TeamTragic » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:13 am

JMac1 wrote:Every is saying Knight is better than Booker. lol. Well some people, lol. Knight is only 24 and if he is better than Booker it should be no problem trading him for a great haul, right?! Ooops....there's your answer.


Knight will never be anywhere near Booker's promise and talent. Anyone that says different needs to go watch that Knight blooper reel.
gaspar
Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
Posts: 6,761
And1: 5,479
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1287 » by gaspar » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:16 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/748730797440446464[/tweet]
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1288 » by TeamTragic » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:16 am

gaspar wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/748730797440446464[/tweet]


Get ready guys! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1289 » by letsgosuns » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:19 am

Bazemore for 20 million a year? Wow. That is ludicrous.
Gorilla Warfare
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,795
And1: 2,330
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1290 » by Gorilla Warfare » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:21 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/nbasteinline/status/748729274534727681[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/sportswhispers/status/748725615138791424[/tweet]

Woof. It has begun.
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1291 » by letsgosuns » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:23 am

Gorilla Warfare wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/nbasteinline/status/748729274534727681[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/sportswhispers/status/748725615138791424[/tweet]

Woof. It has begun.


Pretty sure that Stein account is fake.
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1292 » by TeamTragic » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:24 am

letsgosuns wrote:
Gorilla Warfare wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/nbasteinline/status/748729274534727681[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/sportswhispers/status/748725615138791424[/tweet]

Woof. It has begun.


Pretty sure that is a fake account.


Definitely fake :lol:
SideSwipe
Analyst
Posts: 3,719
And1: 688
Joined: Aug 20, 2007

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1293 » by SideSwipe » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:27 am

Bradley Beal just scored 128 million ($25.6 average). I dare someone to say that Knights deal is bad now......

Edit: Same for Chandler with Noah at $17.5 per.
Gorilla Warfare
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,795
And1: 2,330
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1294 » by Gorilla Warfare » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:28 am

Gotta love NBA free agency! Marc Spears even retweeted it...
Gorilla Warfare
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,795
And1: 2,330
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1295 » by Gorilla Warfare » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:30 am

Brian Windhorst is obese.
MVSteve
Ballboy
Posts: 49
And1: 33
Joined: Jan 07, 2016
     

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1296 » by MVSteve » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:38 am

bwgood77 wrote:
MVSteve wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:The only reason Booker is "ahead" of Warren in his development is that Booker's gotten more time and more touches. If Warren had not gotten injured, we'd be putting Warren and Booker in the same category, IMO.

It'll be interesting to see what happens at the forward spots going forward. Between Chriss, Bender and Warren, someone's going to have to come off the bench, even as all of them are nearing their peaks.


I've thought about that some as well - don't you think it's possible that one of Chriss or Bender can eventually play the 5 though? I know right know we're looking at them both as 3/4, but they're both so young and have lots of room to develop physically, so I don't see why we couldn't play Warren/Bender/Chriss at 3/4/5 eventually.


I'm as optimistic as anyone, and I loved both of these guys in the draft and love Warren, but if they are all good enough to definitely deserve to start, I'll be very happy. I'm guessing one will likely be a solid rotation player at best. Even if they are all studs, one can easily come off the bench and I'm sure if we develop a great team environment it won't be a huge deal. But as things are going small ball, I think if Bender adds some muscle, he can easily play the 5. Maybe even Chriss in small ball. I'm more concerned with them learning how to rebound better and not foul. One step at a time.


Yea, that's a good point. I'm all about managing expectations with these guys, especially early. I'm really interested to see if Chriss can improve on the defensive boards, as I know that was a big criticism of his. If I remember correctly he hasn't been playing basketball very long, so it could be one of those things where he is still learning to use his body effectively and read missed shots to get position.
Gorilla Warfare
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,795
And1: 2,330
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1297 » by Gorilla Warfare » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:39 am

Gonna go to bed. Calling it now, Suns don't do anything until July 4th. That always seems like the day we do something.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1298 » by JMac1 » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:45 am

26 million a year for Whiteside and Beal


Image
jredsaz
General Manager
Posts: 8,916
And1: 3,157
Joined: May 25, 2012
         

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1299 » by jredsaz » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:50 am

Mozgov getting $60+ over 4? Lol! This is the best. Who McD got a deal with? You know it's someone we haven't heard had a connection to the organization.
OGBAH
Senior
Posts: 551
And1: 312
Joined: May 25, 2016
   

Re: The 2016 Offseason Thread (Post Draft) 

Post#1300 » by OGBAH » Fri Jul 1, 2016 4:50 am

When do the owners lock the players out again

Return to Phoenix Suns