jredsaz wrote:Mozgov getting $60+ over 4? Lol! This is the best. Who McD got a deal with? You know it's someone we haven't heard had a connection to the organization.
Lakers aiming really high
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
jredsaz wrote:Mozgov getting $60+ over 4? Lol! This is the best. Who McD got a deal with? You know it's someone we haven't heard had a connection to the organization.

bwgood77 wrote:Wow, Parsons 4/96. I know I said he's better than Barnes, well he got the Barnes max that another team could offer.

GoranTragic wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Wow, Parsons 4/96. I know I said he's better than Barnes, well he got the Barnes max that another team could offer.
SUNS maxing out Barnes?![]()
![]()
dantley4prez wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:dantley4prez wrote:
Well, I know what guys who are worth $70M are like. Len hasn't proven to be that.
To me, there's definitely an element of "what have you shown," in addition to "how much more time do you need?"
I think it might be in our best interest to lock down a guy like Aldrich, who doesn't need the ball, and move on from a guy like Len.
I wouldn't mind holding on to him, but I would mind not listening to offers. We should explore it. That's all I'm saying.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see much of a market for him.
Can I Minus 1 this post? Most of your posts only make sense if your only goal is winning this season. They have no allocation for age, and seem to completely disregard future value. I am going to assume you are either super old or have a disease and therefore need to see us win now. Aldrich signing makes sense, but adding Aldrich to move on from Len doesn't. Not in the slightest.
This is the part where you get presumptuous?
I'm 24 years old, and unlike you, I believe in the roster we have right now.
Adding Aldrich to move on from Len makes a lot of sense.
Len: 20.4 Usg%, .482 TS%, 8.5 Ast%, 17.7 TRB%, 1 STL%, 2.8 BLK%, .035 WS/48, 107 DRtg
Aldrich: 18.4 Usg%, .626 TS%, 10.0 Ast%, 19.6 TRB%, 2.9 STL%, 6.7 BLK%, .209 WS/48, 94 DRtg
There couldn't be a bigger difference.
You see, being nearly the same age as Alex Len, I know that both he and I need more time. 23 really isn't that old. I believe in him, but few teams keep all of their drafted players.
I don't think Alex is a Rudy Gobert type. He seems to be someone whose value is predicated on scoring. He's not an efficient scorer, and it would slow down our pace to incorporate his style into our offense.
I like him, which I've said several times, but I don't know if he's worth the investment. He hasn't proven much yet. Of course I don't have a problem with us seeing how the season goes, but come extension time, my gut tells me that it will make more sense for us to move him. We have Bender, and it's not like we're not young enough. Our youth movement can succeed with Booker, Warren, Bender, Chriss and Ulis. I don't know how much we'll have to pay Len, but most likely, I think it'll be too much for a guy whose scoring we don't need. He won't have an opportunity with the ball in his hands, assuming everyone stays healthy, so I don't even know if he gets a chance to prove it.
Aldrich and Chandler, two of the best per minute big men in the league, for $20M a year? Please. We would have the best center combo, if not a top 5 combo, in the league for at least the next three years. Hard to pass up. Doubt that Len could give us more.
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Any chance Len accepts less than $16m now?
NavLDO wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:Kerrsed wrote:Word is the Raptors have to get rid of a big contract player if they want to re-sign both DeRozen & Biyombo, which reportedly they do. Their biggest contract has also been their biggest letdown of the season. DeMarre Carroll.
I wonder if they would give up on him that easy and if we could get him healthy and keep him healthy. He has 4 years remaining on his contract, which gives us 4 years to develop Bender or Chriss into our future starting SF.
In what way is Marquise Chriss ever going to be an NBA SF? Bender I can somewhat understand, but no freaking way on Chriss. Chriss is a PF through and through. He's closer to a future 5 than a 3. The NBA is trending positionless with guys playing up, not forcing bigs to play the 3.
I'd be okay with Carroll, so long as Tucker is moved. Move Chandler too. Carroll could bring Warren along and Bender and Chriss can man the 4 with some backup 5 minutes to Len.
So you can see the less athletic, 2.5" taller Rookie as a possibility at SF, but the guy who's proven to be able to shoot from outside (in games for long stretches), and by all accounts, is more athletic and if coached up properly, will be able to 'cover' the smaller, more agile 3s--that player you can't see as a 3?
LeBron James is nearly 6'9" and 250lbs. I don't know, but I'd feel better having the hyper-athletic, 6'10" 235lb guy covering LeBron more so than the average athletic, 7'.5" 216lb "bean pole" try to cover LeBron.
Chriss is closer in height and closer in athleticism than Bender, so I don't see how you can see Bender as being the better SF candidate.
GoranTragic wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Wow, Parsons 4/96. I know I said he's better than Barnes, well he got the Barnes max that another team could offer.
SUNS maxing out Barnes?![]()
![]()
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.

AtheJ415 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:rsavaj wrote:I'm still on the Knight for Rubio trade, or a Knight/Chandler for Rubio/Pekovic trade if Minny wants to dump Pekovic entirely and get some toughness up front.
That's a trade worth doing, but Rubio and Bledsoe both deserve to start, but I don't think I'd want to start them together. Booker certainly deserves to start but I don't want him starting at the 3.
I completely disagree here. Pekovic is awful, and while expiring, Tyson's deal is going to become normal in 5 hours once Noah inks that $18 mil and TJ his $10 mil. We ought to be able to, at worst, dump Tyson for nothing.
Knight has value. He's only 24, and while we all hate watching him, he's worth a pick or 2 today imo, and probably worth more in 5 hours when Tyler Johnson sets the market.
Rubio does everything well except shoot, but that shot is a mammoth, mammoth negative that makes him a barely above neutral player.
bwgood77 wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
That's a trade worth doing, but Rubio and Bledsoe both deserve to start, but I don't think I'd want to start them together. Booker certainly deserves to start but I don't want him starting at the 3.
I completely disagree here. Pekovic is awful, and while expiring, Tyson's deal is going to become normal in 5 hours once Noah inks that $18 mil and TJ his $10 mil. We ought to be able to, at worst, dump Tyson for nothing.
Knight has value. He's only 24, and while we all hate watching him, he's worth a pick or 2 today imo, and probably worth more in 5 hours when Tyler Johnson sets the market.
Rubio does everything well except shoot, but that shot is a mammoth, mammoth negative that makes him a barely above neutral player.
Rubio's shooting has improved a bit. While shooting around 33% from 3 isn't great, Knight's 34% isn't much better. Rubio is one of the best passers and pg defenders in the league. Better than Bledsoe at both. I wouldn't do the trade because we have Bledsoe, but if we didn't, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Rubio would make all our players and he obviously doesn't play hero ball or decide to take possessions off. While his defenders might sag, he gets the team REALLY going...Minnesota, with the 5th worst record in the league this year, actually outscored opponents when he was on the floor. He makes THAT big of a difference, particularly with young guys. For our team at this point, he would be great to get them going.

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Any chance Len accepts less than $16m now?


bwgood77 wrote:Mulhollanddrive wrote:Any chance Len accepts less than $16m now?
If people think this year is bad, next year will be worse. If he plays well at all, he will likely get that much.