1UPZ wrote:NBA is basically using band aids to contain laceration wounds.
The league is a business.. We all know that. But it's also sports. Where the best and the winners are objectively determined in most cases.... Journalist voting is a bit grey.
The West has most of the top players. East has been half as deep as the West for the last decade. LeBron walks into a finals almost every year because there is maybe 1 legit competitor out East every year and Cavs are a tier above them.
Players and agents wanting big market teams, good players and stars teaming up with other top tier players after colluding off court which is illegal but the dirt is brushed under the carpet by the league.
Competitive sports is being manipulated to cater more for business needs as well as players forming super teams to try to monopolize the contendership.
Had the league become more spread out in regards to success... More fans will be brought in and integrity improves.
But it won't happen... Too many connections and off court agendas to keep it as is.
Captains??? What is this, playground kickball? All it's missing is the big, red, bouncy ball.
I agree. This should be all execs/ownership (25%), all coaches (25%), all players (25%), public (25%), all equally weighted picking the top East and West. I understand that there is imbalance, but you don't fix it on the back of the All-Star game. This is like changing the band-aid out from a 'My Little Pony' one to a 'Transformers' one. It looks a little cooler, but doesn't really affect any change. There should be a large money pool for winning the ASG as well. Lets watch the top guys compete for real.
This is all symptomatic of the false market that the NBA has become. I think if there is a hard cap teams should have all the flexibility in the world underneath it to sign people all the way up to the cap. If you want a min salary fine, but no max except the cap. Also, explore letting all eligible players be FA's instead of drafting. The draft with its artificially low salaries for stars and artificially high salaries for non-contributors is a bit of a farce. Make only half of every contract be guaranteed, with the rest going into a winners pool for games, playoff and league championship wins. That magically puts more money in the hands of winning teams no matter how small the market, encourages competition, discourages tanking, discourages super-teams in some ways, rewards winning, and allows stars more of their due. Until they take care of those root problems (whether by my solution or some other) it will all be band-aids, and weird setups that don't make any sense.