NoKneeBledsoe wrote:I think we should trade the Morris Bros
Everyone thinks they are good (suns fans)
They are limited and definitely not starting material.
Morris Bros to Utah for Kanter
That's pretty bad for the Suns
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
NoKneeBledsoe wrote:I think we should trade the Morris Bros
Everyone thinks they are good (suns fans)
They are limited and definitely not starting material.
Morris Bros to Utah for Kanter
NoKneeBledsoe wrote:I think we should trade the Morris Bros
Everyone thinks they are good (suns fans)
They are limited and definitely not starting material.
Morris Bros to Utah for Kanter



NoKneeBledsoe wrote:Bayless actually has done more than Bledsoe lol
Not more productive but done more
NoKneeBledsoe wrote:I think we should trade the Morris Bros
Everyone thinks they are good (suns fans)
They are limited and definitely not starting material.
Morris Bros to Utah for Kanter


NoKneeBledsoe wrote:I think we should trade the Morris Bros
Everyone thinks they are good (suns fans)
They are limited and definitely not starting material.
Morris Bros to Utah for Kanter
NoKneeBledsoe wrote:If we get Bledsoe on max or close to max
Answer this for me!
What does it do for us? Are we contenders? Do we win more than 50 games?
How am I trolling when the truth is what it is
I'm a fan but unbiased and speak the truth
Bledsoe 4 year 44 million is the most I would pay for him and that's a lot

Kerrsed wrote:NoKneeBledsoe wrote:Bayless actually has done more than Bledsoe lol
Not more productive but done moreNoKneeBledsoe wrote:I think we should trade the Morris Bros
Everyone thinks they are good (suns fans)
They are limited and definitely not starting material.
Morris Bros to Utah for Kanter
Kerrsed wrote:NoKneeBledsoe wrote:Bayless actually has done more than Bledsoe lol
Not more productive but done moreNoKneeBledsoe wrote:I think we should trade the Morris Bros
Everyone thinks they are good (suns fans)
They are limited and definitely not starting material.
Morris Bros to Utah for Kanter

ginobiliflops wrote:NoKneeBledsoe wrote:If we get Bledsoe on max or close to max
Answer this for me!
What does it do for us? Are we contenders? Do we win more than 50 games?
How am I trolling when the truth is what it is
I'm a fan but unbiased and speak the truth
Bledsoe 4 year 44 million is the most I would pay for him and that's a lot
But somehow Kanter and Bayless would be the answer?![]()
You do know we were on pace for more than 50 wins when Bledsoe got hurt? I'll wait for deuce to reply that the strength of schedule/ moon tides were affecting that.

NoKneeBledsoe wrote:
Then I'll say u guys were right. If he goes and shoots 40% and gets 5 rebounds a game as a PF then I can say let's trade him!

ginobiliflops wrote:NoKneeBledsoe wrote:
Then I'll say u guys were right. If he goes and shoots 40% and gets 5 rebounds a game as a PF then I can say let's trade him!
Frye isn't here anymore...