ImageImageImage

Draft Discussion Part 3

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Who would you rather have, Jackson or Tatum?

Jackson
44
80%
Tatum
11
20%
 
Total votes: 55

User avatar
RunSunRun
Veteran
Posts: 2,789
And1: 723
Joined: Apr 25, 2010
Location: PHX
       

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1321 » by RunSunRun » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:42 pm

ATTL wrote:Can't we get in on this trade for the first pick?


The worst part if Philly moves to #1, they'll probably use that Lakers unprotected pick to do so...the pick we traded them for Brandon **** Knight...ughhhhhh
User avatar
Sreister
Senior
Posts: 503
And1: 316
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Iowa
     

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1322 » by Sreister » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:42 pm

RunSunRun wrote:Man, I have a feeling something crazy is going to happen on draft day. Why does Philly want Fultz so badly...giving up on the Simmons PG experiment before it even begins? Boston, is it about assets, do they think Fultz isn't as good as advertised, or do they feel Jackson is #1 but feel he'll fall to #3?

Biggest question mark, if this trade happens, is what the Lakers end up doing.

Do they screw Boston and take Jackson at #2? Does Boston take Ball or go with Tatum/Isaac? Soooo many questions and scenarios.

Man, this draft is more exciting than the regular season, hahaha.

/insert heavy breathing cat picture here


My only thing with Philly is, the whole Simmons playing PG = Lebron type PG. They can have a PG and still use Simmons as a facilitator. They could really use Fultz. So can we..eh Boston? :D
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1323 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:42 pm

BobbieL wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
Spoiler:


Go away BW....Read this yesterday. Very good read that will cause more vacillation; especially the pic.....look at his arms. He looks good right there.


Well, we're just talking. I'm pretty sure it's between Isaac and Tatum for the FO, unless Jackson were to slip, which would really surprise me. The fact that Isaac won't work out with any teams after 4 and that they dined with him and worked him out twice. Then of course we worked out Tatum twice as well.

If Ball slips it might be interesting. I wonder if Ball slipped all the way to 5 if the Kings would still take Fox.


Do the Celtics need Ball?

So, Sixers go Fultz - which makes sense as they probably want to sign Lowry for PG

Jackson goes to the Lakers than - or do they take Ball

But if JJ goes to Lakers - do the Celtics need Ball ? I have no idea what the Celtics need but it might be a 4 - is that Tatum or Isaac to pair with Jaylen Brown?


I don't know. The Celtics may be really high on three prospects. They might like Ball, or perhaps a guy like Isaac. Or maybe they are working on a bigger deal for a star. They've been rumored to want Okafor in the past, so maybe Okafor is for the swap and then they just go who they think is BPA at 3.

They are actually the other team besides us that has worked out Isaac and could use a player like him. If McD is really high on him then there is a good chance Ainge is too.
User avatar
ATTL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,624
And1: 8,483
Joined: Aug 24, 2003
Location: Moms basement
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1324 » by ATTL » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:44 pm

How many picks would you pay to move up to number one?
#4
2017 Miami
2021 unprotected Miami
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1325 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:45 pm

JMac1 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
Spoiler:


Go away BW....Read this yesterday. Very good read that will cause more vacillation; especially the pic.....look at his arms. He looks good right there.


Well, we're just talking. I'm pretty sure it's between Isaac and Tatum for the FO, unless Jackson were to slip, which would really surprise me. The fact that Isaac won't work out with any teams after 4 and that they dined with him and worked him out twice. Then of course we worked out Tatum twice as well.

If Ball slips it might be interesting. I wonder if Ball slipped all the way to 5 if the Kings would still take Fox.


That's the draft story right there. Fultz, Ball, and Jackson will be gone, I believe that 100 percent. The only thing in doubt is who will be picking the player and who goes first between Ball and Jackson.

If Isaac can't play the 3, it has to be Tatum. I am 70 percent positive that is who we are drafting.


I think we will take Tatum if Boston flips with Philly and takes Isaac. Otherwise I would guess we slightly lean Isaac, since he didn't work out for any teams below us, and only worked out with Boston and us that I know of.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1326 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:45 pm

ATTL wrote:How many picks would you pay to move up to number one?
#4
2017 Miami
2021 unprotected Miami


I'd have to know who we are taking. I"d hate to give up much and take Ball or something.
User avatar
ATTL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,624
And1: 8,483
Joined: Aug 24, 2003
Location: Moms basement
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1327 » by ATTL » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:47 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
ATTL wrote:How many picks would you pay to move up to number one?
#4
2017 Miami
2021 unprotected Miami


I'd have to know who we are taking. I"d hate to give up much and take Ball or something.


We'd be taking Fultz then shipping bledsoe off somewhere.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1328 » by BobbieL » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:47 pm

ATTL wrote:How many picks would you pay to move up to number one?
#4
2017 Miami
2021 unprotected Miami


Not that much. Those picks are a valuable commodity. Especially the 2021 unprotected pick.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1329 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:48 pm

RunSunRun wrote:Man, I have a feeling something crazy is going to happen on draft day. Why does Philly want Fultz so badly...giving up on the Simmons PG experiment before it even begins? Boston, is it about assets, do they think Fultz isn't as good as advertised, or do they feel Jackson is #1 but feel he'll fall to #3?

Biggest question mark, if this trade happens, is what the Lakers end up doing.

Do they screw Boston and take Jackson at #2? Does Boston take Ball or go with Tatum/Isaac? Soooo many questions and scenarios.

Man, this draft is more exciting than the regular season, hahaha.

/insert heavy breathing cat picture here


Fultz can play 1 or 2. The main good thing is that he can shoot. They need shooters. The fact that he can pass isn't a bad thing obviously.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1330 » by BobbieL » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:48 pm

ATTL wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
ATTL wrote:How many picks would you pay to move up to number one?
#4
2017 Miami
2021 unprotected Miami


I'd have to know who we are taking. I"d hate to give up much and take Ball or something.


We'd be taking Fultz then shipping bledsoe off somewhere.


Isn't Fultz redundant if you have Booker? Unless you think the Booker Fultz backcourt could be like Curry and Klay

I would do the 2018 Heat and maybe a Suns pick in 2019, protected
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,370
And1: 17,004
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1331 » by Saberestar » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:48 pm

ATTL wrote:How many picks would you pay to move up to number one?
#4
2017 Miami
2021 unprotected Miami

Absolutely yes for Fultz.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1332 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:50 pm

itlnsunsfan wrote:
Spoiler:
bwgood77 wrote:From the Magic board.....

Why Jonathan Isaac?


Right Time Frame - Magic are currently in player development mode. Cavs and Warriors will continue their run for the next 2-3 years at least. By that time Lebron will be 35 years old and there should be room for new powers to emerge in the East. This time will allow Isaac to mold his body and develop his game... and hopefully, he could be the budding star ready to lead the Magic's next run at the top.

Versatility, Rareness and Fit - Isaac's ability to play 3-5 makes him among the short list of players in the NBA who can do it (Lebron, Giannis, Draymond). Out of the gate he will fit best at SF/PF and that combination makes him the ideal fit next to Aaron Gordon. Isaac can be the shooter/slasher at SF and long help defender at PF while Gordon plays closer to the rim on offense and on the perimeter on defense. In terms of finding another player that will fit as well as Isaac next to Gordon, this opportunity might not ever arise again... and certainly not in the same age fitting. It's hard to pass on Isaac for a PG (no matter how good) because PGs come along every year. Meanwhile, if Elfrid is here Isaac helps spread the floor for Elf's drives in the lane and also gives Elf another fluid big man to throw lobs to.

New Age Center - The Magic have always established themselves around an elite Center to propel them to the Finals (Shaq/Dwight). The next time this happens, it could be around a new age center in the mold of Jonathan Isaac. The sky is the limit for Isaac. It's no secret the league is trending towards small ball, but smarter minds know that doesn't mean length is being ignored. Length definitely still matters. The only things restricting the league from full time small ball is the available talent and the precaution of wear and tear. Regular season basketball is long and arduous... and fast paced basketball will wear teams out. But come playoff time, teams utilize every advantage over that short span and small ball often takes center stage. Isaac's versatility at his size and skills would put the Magic ahead of the curve. Make no doubt, as Isaac grows into his man suit, he WILL play some Center in the NBA and in that line up, the team that has him will have a huge advantage in playoff basketball. They will still need traditional Centers who can eat up minutes at C during the regular season. I'm not advising Isaac as a full time C because too much time at C will result in too much wear and tear on his body. But when we need him there, he will give us a huge edge.

That elusive 2 way player - The Magic have been in desperate need of a star player who can pose as both an offensive and defensive threat. Isaac could easily bring that out-of-box and he's still a very raw player. Say what you want about Isaac's tendency for allowing his veteran teammates to take center stage, and doubting his alpha dog make up. Isaac has shown passionate outbursts and stretches where he carried a veteran FSU squad. He's more than a momentum changer. When all is said and done, Isaac could be the guy to legitimize Magic basketball once again.

Health & Intangibles - Isaac comes in with a clean medical record and rap sheet. Zero issues. Nuff said. A Bronx kid who played HS basketball in Florida. He'll be sure to have a built-in support system in Orlando.

His Competition - Even if I believed Fox would develop a consistent shot to his game, he's simply not a rare enough prospect. It's too foolish to believe that a good FT% is a reliable indicator that someone will become a good shooter. This belief was followed when the Hornets selected Michael Kidd-Gilchrist #2 overall. He held a .025 3PT%, but his .075 FT% made folks believe his shot would come around. Today, Fox sports a .025 3PT% and a .074 FT% and folks are saying the same thing. That his defense, intangibles and strong desire to win are enough... Let's not make the mistake that the Hornets made.

Every Tatum fan wants to point to the FSU/Duke game where Tatum supposedly outplayed Isaac. Looking at the stat board, you would assume that. Unless you dove deeper and realized that Isaac picked up a couple of ticky tack fouls early on and was benched. When Isaac did enter the game, he gave Tatum nightmares. Tatum's old man athleticism was no match for the longer and more dynamic Isaac.

I've been high on DSJ for a long time and I'm still a huge fan. I see a Baron Davis, Steve Francis mix and I know he'll be a success in the league. I believe in him fully. So it really is splitting hairs for me when it comes to Isaac vs Smith. In the end, Isaac's upside and rarity is so high that it gives me a bad feeling that if we pass on him that Minnesota will be there to swipe him up. I'm much more fond of the available talent for PG at #25 (or in future drafts), than I am of the comparable options to Isaac at #25 (or in the future).

Our Competition - Speaking of the Wolves, they will be among the new young teams that we will be battling with in the future if health and fortune permit. The Bucks, Sixers, Knicks, Lakers, Suns, and Kings are all stockpiling youth and the Magic need to hit this pick right because there is enough talent in this draft for those teams to be making big additions this summer as well.

No need to overthink this.

Image


The numbers are incorrectly written. For example, a .025 3pt% indicates 25 makes out of 100,000 attempts. Remove the % symbol, and it is still a shortfall, indicating .025 makes out of 1, or 2.5%. The proper numbers would be either .25 3pt shooting, or 25% 3pt shooting percentage. Otherwise, nice piece.


I know....he means 25%. Still bad.
Jarlaxle0204
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,969
And1: 2,103
Joined: Jan 06, 2012
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1333 » by Jarlaxle0204 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:50 pm

This sucks. I had Boston with Fultz, LA with Ball and the possibility of Philly passing on JJ for someone like Monk. If they switch picks, I don't see Boston passing on JJ at 3.

Tatum it is. I hope he and Booker can form a deadly duo.
Villalobos
Pro Prospect
Posts: 995
And1: 1,266
Joined: Apr 27, 2016

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1334 » by Villalobos » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:56 pm

Celtics taking another dude who can't shoot. Smart. You could almost say it's... Marcus smart.

...

:nonono:

Also, if you want a good SF, why not just use that pick to trade for PG or Butler, proven stars, over the dude who shot in the 50s with FTs since high school?
User avatar
Sunsss
Analyst
Posts: 3,342
And1: 1,074
Joined: Apr 04, 2010
     

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1335 » by Sunsss » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:58 pm

McD to Ainge right now:

McD: You're gonna take my guy at #3, right?
Ainge: Maybe.
McD: Ok, what do you want?
itlnsunsfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 831
And1: 877
Joined: Jul 13, 2015
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1336 » by itlnsunsfan » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:00 pm

Villalobos wrote:Celtics taking another dude who can't shoot. Smart. You could almost say it's... Marcus smart.


Bahaha well done sir.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1337 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:00 pm

Villalobos wrote:Celtics taking another dude who can't shoot. Smart. You could almost say it's... Marcus smart.

...

:nonono:

Also, if you want a good SF, why not just use that pick to trade for PG or Butler, proven stars, over the dude who shot in the 50s with FTs since high school?


They wouldn't trade down if they wanted Jackson. LA is rumored to be really high on him. That's risky. They have to be high on someone else, and guards don't make complete sense for them as many as they have.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1338 » by BobbieL » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:05 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Villalobos wrote:Celtics taking another dude who can't shoot. Smart. You could almost say it's... Marcus smart.

...

:nonono:

Also, if you want a good SF, why not just use that pick to trade for PG or Butler, proven stars, over the dude who shot in the 50s with FTs since high school?


They wouldn't trade down if they wanted Jackson. LA is rumored to be really high on him. That's risky. They have to be high on someone else, and guards don't make complete sense for them as many as they have.


Sixers go Fultz
Lakers go Jackson
Celtics go Tatum or Isaac
Suns take Ball , trade Bledsoe and fix a luxury suite for Papa Ball with some proud glass and a one way door that doesn't allow him near the court
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1339 » by bwgood77 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:08 pm

BobbieL wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Villalobos wrote:Celtics taking another dude who can't shoot. Smart. You could almost say it's... Marcus smart.

...

:nonono:

Also, if you want a good SF, why not just use that pick to trade for PG or Butler, proven stars, over the dude who shot in the 50s with FTs since high school?


They wouldn't trade down if they wanted Jackson. LA is rumored to be really high on him. That's risky. They have to be high on someone else, and guards don't make complete sense for them as many as they have.


Sixers go Fultz
Lakers go Jackson
Celtics go Tatum or Isaac
Suns take Ball , trade Bledsoe and fix a luxury suite for Papa Ball with some proud glass and a one way door that doesn't allow him near the court


If Celtics were to go Isaac there I'm not sure who I'd want between Tatum and Ball. Probably Ball.
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,370
And1: 17,004
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: 2017 Draft Discussion Part 3 [New Poll] 

Post#1340 » by Saberestar » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:09 pm

Read on Twitter

Return to Phoenix Suns