Puff wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Puff wrote:Why did we fire Monty Williams again? He has the 3rd best winning percentage in franchise history. For that matter why did Kerr try to force Thibodeau on my favorite coach Mike D'Antonni. Westphal has the best record in history. what happened to him.
Found this in the Arizona Republic. Coach, Years coached and win loss record. I added in the winning percentage
Where will Ott place on this list?
How many years does he get?
Mike Budenholzer 2024-2025 36-46 0.439
Frank Vogel 2023-2024 49-33 0.597
Monty Williams 2019-2023 194-115 0.627
Igor Kokoskov 2018-2019 19-63 0.232
Jay Triano 2017-2018 21-58 0.266
Earl Watson 2016-2017 33-85 0.28
Jeff Honacek 2013-2016 101-112 0.478
Lindsey Hunter 2013 12-29 0.293
Alvin Gentry 2009-2013 158-144 0.523
Terry Porter 2008-2009 28-23 0.549
Mike D'Antoni 2003-2009 253-136 0.65
Frank Johnson 2002-2003 63-71 0.47
Scott Skiles 1999-2002 116-79 0.595
Danny Ainge 1996-1999 136-90 0.601
Paul Westphal 1992-1996 191-88 0.684
John Wetzel 1987-1988 28-54 0.341
Dick Van Arsdale 1987 14-12 0.538
John MacLeod 1973-1987 579-543 0.516
Butch Van Breda Koff 1973 3-4 0.429
C Fitzsimmons Various 341-208 0.621
Jerry Colangelo 1970,72-73 59-60 0.496
Johnny Kerr 1968-1969 31-89 0.258
You know what I think has a lot to do with those winning %s? The players they have. I think Fitzsimmons was our best coach. He had no Barkley, Nash, CP3, Book, etc.
He did have a 2nd year KJ (and his next few years...basically like a rookie contract), Chambers and a lot of good players like Hornacek and Majerle, and they played so great as a team. They didn't really have any big time past all stars on that team when he took it over. Chambers had made one all star team. They get to the WCF in his first two years with a 2nd and 3rd year PG. Knock out the defending champion Lakers and MVP Magic in 5 in the semis in his second year.
I doubt that there is any coach in history that did not win a championship due to having great players and rosters. The possibly greatest coach in history had either Michael and Scottie or Kobie and Shaq. He won without a big three. Red Aurbach always had the best roster in the league. You have to give it up to Popovich and the Spurs. They won when Pop had the best roster but hung on to him in the good and bad times.
I think often times Carlisle has not had the best roster and has done a lot more than expected. Start with the 2011 Mavs. They were underdog in every series after beating the Blazers with Aldridge, Roy, Batum, a good Wesley Mathews and Andre Miller. They had Dirk (obviously a superstar), but an aging Marion, aging Kidd (37), Jason Terry, their top 5 players ove 0 and went up against the defending champion and 2 our of last 3 champion Lakers (Kobe, Pau, Odom, Bynum, Metta World Piece, etc), then they knocked out the Thunder with KD, Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka and Perkins, before beating the Lebron/Wade/Bosh Heat in the finals.
He also built that 2003 Pistons teams out of no names, getting them to play right... he put together a bunch of players who, at the time, had done nothing, Billups, Hamilton, Prince, and Ben Wallace and got the to the ECF. For whatever reason, they fired him, and brought in Larry Brown, and then a team gifted them Rasheed Wallace, giving them their best player, and they shock the Lakers in 2004. Carllisle basically built that team.
Then he went to the Pacers to build a team to challenge that Pistons team, and did, and built a team that likely would have beat them, with Artest, Jermaine O'Neal, Stephen Jackson, and older Reggie Miller, etc, and of course the Malice in the Palace happens and all the suspensions, paving the way for the Pistons to make the finals again and lose to the Spurs.
Now he has the Pacers playing as well as they can, but they are vastly overmatched. He's always seemed to be a coach that got more than the sum of the parts...make great TEAMS....didn't need a ton of superstars.